Saturday, August 18, 2007

As Billboards, Public Phones Always Work

By JO CRAVEN McGINTY; Published: August 17, 2007

They stand on corners from Brighton Beach to the Bronx, all but mocking New Yorkers: Pay phones that may or may not work, which you can’t even check for a dial tone without worrying about germs.

But they remain rooted in the pavement of New York, blocking pedestrian traffic, looking a bit like museum pieces in an age of cellphones, BlackBerrys and Bluetooth headsets.

There is a reason for their survival: Public telephones are one of the stranger cash cows in city finance. Not because of the coins that are fed into them, but rather because of the millions upon millions that companies are willing to pay to put ads on them.

The phone kiosks generate $62 million in advertising revenue annually — and last year the city got $13.7 million of the take, triple what it pulled in from calls.

Over all, the number of pay phones in New York is falling, as it is throughout the country. But in a phenomenon unique to New York, the phones are more valuable than ever, thanks to the intense competition among advertisers for attention in a city of eight million.

Phone companies say the pay phones are still necessary, noting that during 9/11 and the 2003 blackout, people lined up to use them. But it is the phone kiosks’ desirability to advertisers, who love them because they are inexpensive and plentiful, that appears to be driving pressure on the city for permission to install new phones in choice locations.

Since 2003, every new phone the city has authorized has been put at the curb, the only spot where city regulations permit advertising. It has approved moving 465 pay phones from alongside buildings to the curb.

The phones are a source of frustration to some neighborhood and community groups, who say the city is giving precious sidewalk space over to what New York needs least: more messages from Madison Avenue. They are urging the city to put limits on pay phones and their advertising.

“The phone booths are unkempt. They are dirty. The advertising is overwhelming,” said Vanessa Gruen, director of special projects for the Municipal Art Society, which has objected to the phones. “The sidewalks of New York are our biggest public space, and somebody should be watching over them, and they should not be for sale for the city to make money out of them.”

The Department of Information Technology and Telecommunications, which regulates the phones, declined to discuss their pay phone policies. Press aides to Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg did not respond to an e-mail message.

New York transformed the pay phone business in 1999 when it signed franchise agreements with all pay phone companies operating in the city and required them to use media representatives specializing in outdoor marketing to sell their ad space. Previously, only New York Telephone was licensed to provide pay phones in the city, though other companies did so anyway. Now, 39 pay phone companies have agreements.

Within two years, the city’s pay phone ad revenue had outstripped its earnings from calls. The city collects 26 percent of the ad money, while it gets 10 percent of the revenue from local calls and 50 percent from long-distance calls.

The gap between the income sources has continued to widen.

“One of the top buys in New York right now, and it has been for the last couple of years, is phone kiosks,” said Keith Stewart, vice president of Generation Outdoor, which places outdoor advertising. “We’re able to spend a fraction of what we would for other outdoor formats. With kiosks, I can blanket the city.”

Although the number of phones in the city is shrinking — there are now about 22,700 — , 80 percent of the decline has been from phones alongside buildings, rather than at the curb, according to the Department of Information Technology and Telecommunications. Those are the phones that do not permit advertising.

“It’s so clearly for advertising,” said David G. Liston, chairman of Manhattan Community Board Eight.

Mr. Liston would rather have trees than pay phones sprouting from city curbs. “Sometimes, you’ll see two and three pay phones together as if it’s an airport,” he said. “It’s almost as if they are putting out more phones for bigger ad spaces.”

Some restrictions have been put in place. Advertising on curbside kiosks on purely residential streets is not allowed. And no ads are permitted on any new pay phones approved since December 2004 in Manhattan neighborhoods south of Harlem.

Pay phone companies say they sympathize with neighborhood residents. But they warn that New York would be worse off with fewer public phones, and ads help the companies survive.

“It’s keeping the public pay phones alive,” said Les Shafran, executive director of the Independent Payphone Association of New York.

While the agreements vary, generally, the phone companies receive up to a third of the revenue, while media representatives who market the space take in roughly 50 percent.

“Pay phone providers in other parts of the county are seeing ad revenue, but not like New York,” said Tracey Timpanaro, editor and publisher of Perspectives on Public Communication magazine, a publication of the American Public Communications Council. “It’s the foot traffic. No other place is going to have that level of foot traffic.”

Mr. Stewart agrees: “It’s definitely a New York niche phenomenon. Once you get to New York, you’re batting with everything. You have taxi tops, transit shelters and urban panels. You have bus sides, bus interiors, subway interiors and subway platform posters. And then you have traditional bulletins — the billboards — and, in some cases, walls.”

Even in such a saturated market, Richard Schaps, the chairman and chief executive of Van Wagner, the media representative that controls advertising on 3,000 of the city’s phone kiosks, says there is room for growth.

Van Wagner has spent at least $129,000 since 2000 to lobby the city for pay phone advertising and the installation of phones on city streets. And it has asked the Traffic Audit Bureau, which monitors the reach of billboards and other outdoor media, to devise a method to measure pay phone kiosks as well — a first for the bureau.

Posted by M at 04:56:53 | Permalink | No Comments »

Sunday, April 15, 2007

Map software pinpoints environment hotspots

Services utilize convergence of tools like Google Earth, EPA data

Benjamin Pimentel, Chronicle Staff Writer; Sunday, April 15, 2007

Web connoisseurs have grown accustomed to going online and getting an aerial view of their neighborhoods, or even their houses, using software like Google Earth.

Now they can look at the same world and get a subterranean view.

A sophisticated new breed of mapping software on the Web is allowing users to pinpoint toxic hot spots and hazardous sites beneath the ground using a wealth of new information and mashed-up existing technology. Those developments have opened up business opportunities for consulting firms and new ways for government and advocacy organizations to inform the public about hazardous, environmentally dangerous sites.

Take Locus Technologies in Mountain View, which, using Google Earth’s satellite imagery, has created an online program that pinpoints problem sites throughout the country, including the infamous Superfund sites designated as super-toxic by the Environmental Protection Agency.

Type in a ZIP code, and yellow stars indicate the Superfund sites on or near the designated area. A version of the Locus software available to corporate subscribers offers a detailed look at each site, including the types of toxic materials and contamination levels under the ground.

“This is the kind of information engineers and geologists need to know: What’s going on at this refinery,” said Todd Pierce, a senior database developer with Locus.

“This is going down beneath your site 10 feet, 20 feet below,” he added. “We’ve got some that go 200 to 300 feet. It’s seeing what’s underneath your site.”

The interest in environmental mapping increased even more in January when the EPA began making available online huge amounts of digital data. The emergence of the so-called software-as-a-service business model, in which businesses can pay for computing services they use and not have to spend a bundle building an in-house data center, has also made environmental mapping affordable to more companies.

“Google has given you the platform,” said Pat Garvey, a system manager with the EPA.

“EPA is giving you the data. It’s a convergence of software and of source data. The software is there. The Internet is there. Now the data is available.”

Government environmental data, from the EPA and state agencies, have been available to the public for decades.

In California, for example, the State Water Resources Control Board has made water contamination data available through GeoTracker. The agency plans to make even more data in geospatial format available this year, said Nancy Miller, the board’s deputy director of information technology.

Corporations use the information to comply with government regulations related to cleaning up and monitoring hazardous-waste sites.

Because of stricter accounting rules as a result of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, companies now also must report more-detailed financial liabilities stemming from their properties with environmental problems.

Erroneous reporting or disclosure of such liabilities could lead to penalties for CEOs or chief financial officers, Locus CEO Neno Duplancic said.

Then there are the growing concerns over global warming and other environmental problems, which have led more companies to focus on so-called green issues.

But plowing through huge amounts of technical data became a problem for a host of companies. Many of them have turned to environmental consulting firms to analyze and present the information in forms that can be easily understood.

“We have witnessed over the years how the information overload grew like a cancer,” Duplancic said. “Everything was landing on spreadsheets and large databases. Clients found themselves with piles of data and nobody knew what to do with it.”

Getting access to publicly available environmental information was even tougher for community and advocacy organizations, said Gina Solomon, senior scientist with the Natural Resources Defense Council.

“It’s a critical problem if you are a community group trying to figure out what a factory near you is putting out and the information is in an EPA cabinet hundreds of miles away,” she said.

Advances in mapping software, known as geographic information systems, or GIS, also made it possible to present the data visually. But Garvey said that, while the EPA had volumes of data available, it was not easily accessible.

That changed in January, when the agency unveiled the EPA Geospatial Data Project. The download service offer detailed information on environmental conditions by location.

Environmental consulting firms, such as Locus, immediately pounced on the opportunity to expand their services by using the EPA data.

Another company, Enviro-score, also has accessed the EPA data to offer site assessment services.

The Baton Rouge, La., startup produces environmental reports that include ratings of specific sites based on the presence of toxic or hazardous sites.

“This data being released like this allows for many businesses and us to accomplish more with less time,” Enviroscore CEO Diane Baum said. “Just five years ago, this business wasn’t possible. GIS and mapping software was costly and government data was not available to merge into a businesses’ system.

“Now, mapping software and GIS has become cheaper and everybody is using mapping to some extent in their businesses,” she added.

Andres Ferrate, CEO of Terra Internet Mapping Solutions, a Portland, Ore., startup that offers services to help businesses integrate Internet maps into their operations, echoed this view, saying Google has revolutionized online mapping services.

“I’m just amazed by what Google has done,” he said. “They have essentially made a multimillion-dollar GIS application available for free.”

The Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, a research lab operated by the university for the U.S. Department of Energy, uses Locus’ services to keep track of groundwater contamination on its site.

Susan Witebsky, an assistant department head there, said that in the past the lab had to rely on Microsoft Excel spreadsheets to manage data and created maps by hand. That work got done faster with Locus, which charges businesses and organizations a few hundred dollars to a few thousands dollars a month depending on the size and the number of databases a customer wants to access.

Solomon of the Natural Resources Defense Council said nonprofit and community groups will benefit “from this democratization of information.”

But she also lamented that these organizations probably will not be able to afford the more-sophisticated services offered by many environmental consulting firms.

Still, the public may eventually get easier access to more-detailed — and free — environmental data.

The EPA’s Garvey said the agency, inspired by the growth of such sites as YouTube and eBay, hopes an “environmental channel” on the Internet will emerge.

“We think there is an awful lot of public appetite for environmental information from a geospatial view,” he said. “We certainly think that if we make the data readily available, we’re going to see an environmental channel just grow.”

Added William Rukeyser, the California water board’s public affairs director: “This is the democratization of data. We’re making sure that it is available easily and speedily and it is no longer the province of specialized knowledge.”

E-mail Benjamin Pimentel at bpimentel@sfchronicle.com.

Posted by M at 22:15:27 | Permalink | No Comments »

Map software pinpoints environment hotspots

Services utilize convergence of tools like Google Earth, EPA data

Benjamin Pimentel, Chronicle Staff Writer; Sunday, April 15, 2007

Web connoisseurs have grown accustomed to going online and getting an aerial view of their neighborhoods, or even their houses, using software like Google Earth.

Now they can look at the same world and get a subterranean view.

A sophisticated new breed of mapping software on the Web is allowing users to pinpoint toxic hot spots and hazardous sites beneath the ground using a wealth of new information and mashed-up existing technology. Those developments have opened up business opportunities for consulting firms and new ways for government and advocacy organizations to inform the public about hazardous, environmentally dangerous sites.

Take Locus Technologies in Mountain View, which, using Google Earth’s satellite imagery, has created an online program that pinpoints problem sites throughout the country, including the infamous Superfund sites designated as super-toxic by the Environmental Protection Agency.

Type in a ZIP code, and yellow stars indicate the Superfund sites on or near the designated area. A version of the Locus software available to corporate subscribers offers a detailed look at each site, including the types of toxic materials and contamination levels under the ground.

“This is the kind of information engineers and geologists need to know: What’s going on at this refinery,” said Todd Pierce, a senior database developer with Locus.

“This is going down beneath your site 10 feet, 20 feet below,” he added. “We’ve got some that go 200 to 300 feet. It’s seeing what’s underneath your site.”

The interest in environmental mapping increased even more in January when the EPA began making available online huge amounts of digital data. The emergence of the so-called software-as-a-service business model, in which businesses can pay for computing services they use and not have to spend a bundle building an in-house data center, has also made environmental mapping affordable to more companies.

“Google has given you the platform,” said Pat Garvey, a system manager with the EPA.

“EPA is giving you the data. It’s a convergence of software and of source data. The software is there. The Internet is there. Now the data is available.”

Government environmental data, from the EPA and state agencies, have been available to the public for decades.

In California, for example, the State Water Resources Control Board has made water contamination data available through GeoTracker. The agency plans to make even more data in geospatial format available this year, said Nancy Miller, the board’s deputy director of information technology.

Corporations use the information to comply with government regulations related to cleaning up and monitoring hazardous-waste sites.

Because of stricter accounting rules as a result of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, companies now also must report more-detailed financial liabilities stemming from their properties with environmental problems.

Erroneous reporting or disclosure of such liabilities could lead to penalties for CEOs or chief financial officers, Locus CEO Neno Duplancic said.

Then there are the growing concerns over global warming and other environmental problems, which have led more companies to focus on so-called green issues.

But plowing through huge amounts of technical data became a problem for a host of companies. Many of them have turned to environmental consulting firms to analyze and present the information in forms that can be easily understood.

“We have witnessed over the years how the information overload grew like a cancer,” Duplancic said. “Everything was landing on spreadsheets and large databases. Clients found themselves with piles of data and nobody knew what to do with it.”

Getting access to publicly available environmental information was even tougher for community and advocacy organizations, said Gina Solomon, senior scientist with the Natural Resources Defense Council.

“It’s a critical problem if you are a community group trying to figure out what a factory near you is putting out and the information is in an EPA cabinet hundreds of miles away,” she said.

Advances in mapping software, known as geographic information systems, or GIS, also made it possible to present the data visually. But Garvey said that, while the EPA had volumes of data available, it was not easily accessible.

That changed in January, when the agency unveiled the EPA Geospatial Data Project. The download service offer detailed information on environmental conditions by location.

Environmental consulting firms, such as Locus, immediately pounced on the opportunity to expand their services by using the EPA data.

Another company, Enviro-score, also has accessed the EPA data to offer site assessment services.

The Baton Rouge, La., startup produces environmental reports that include ratings of specific sites based on the presence of toxic or hazardous sites.

“This data being released like this allows for many businesses and us to accomplish more with less time,” Enviroscore CEO Diane Baum said. “Just five years ago, this business wasn’t possible. GIS and mapping software was costly and government data was not available to merge into a businesses’ system.

“Now, mapping software and GIS has become cheaper and everybody is using mapping to some extent in their businesses,” she added.

Andres Ferrate, CEO of Terra Internet Mapping Solutions, a Portland, Ore., startup that offers services to help businesses integrate Internet maps into their operations, echoed this view, saying Google has revolutionized online mapping services.

“I’m just amazed by what Google has done,” he said. “They have essentially made a multimillion-dollar GIS application available for free.”

The Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, a research lab operated by the university for the U.S. Department of Energy, uses Locus’ services to keep track of groundwater contamination on its site.

Susan Witebsky, an assistant department head there, said that in the past the lab had to rely on Microsoft Excel spreadsheets to manage data and created maps by hand. That work got done faster with Locus, which charges businesses and organizations a few hundred dollars to a few thousands dollars a month depending on the size and the number of databases a customer wants to access.

Solomon of the Natural Resources Defense Council said nonprofit and community groups will benefit “from this democratization of information.”

But she also lamented that these organizations probably will not be able to afford the more-sophisticated services offered by many environmental consulting firms.

Still, the public may eventually get easier access to more-detailed — and free — environmental data.

The EPA’s Garvey said the agency, inspired by the growth of such sites as YouTube and eBay, hopes an “environmental channel” on the Internet will emerge.

“We think there is an awful lot of public appetite for environmental information from a geospatial view,” he said. “We certainly think that if we make the data readily available, we’re going to see an environmental channel just grow.”

Added William Rukeyser, the California water board’s public affairs director: “This is the democratization of data. We’re making sure that it is available easily and speedily and it is no longer the province of specialized knowledge.”

E-mail Benjamin Pimentel at bpimentel@sfchronicle.com.

http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/chronicle/archive/2007/04/15/BUGM1P8APK1.DTL

This article appeared on page D - 1 of the San Francisco Chronicle

Posted by M at 18:34:29 | Permalink | No Comments »

Monday, February 5, 2007

Wireless Internet for All, Without the Towers

By RANDALL STROSS; Published: February 4, 2007

 

THESE still are early days for the Internet, globally speaking. One billion people online; five billion to go.

The next billion to be connected are living in homes that are physically close to an Internet gateway. They await a solution to the famous “last mile” problem: extending affordable broadband service to each person’s doorstep.

Here in the United States, 27 percent of the population lacks access to the Internet, according to a study completed last year by the Pew Internet and American Life Project. Among those who do have access, about 30 percent still rely on slow dial-up connections. The last mile for households with no or slow connections may be provided by radio signals sent out by transmitters perched atop street lights, as hundreds of cities have rolled out municipal Wi-Fi networks, or are in the process of doing so.

The impulse behind these projects is noble. It’s a shame, however, that lots of street lamps and lots of dollars — a typical deployment in an urban setting will run $75,000 to $125,000 a square mile, just to install the equipment — do not really solve the last-mile problem.

If you’re sitting with your laptop at an outside cafe, you’ll be happy with the service. But if you happen to be at home, you realize that service to the doorstep is not enough: you still need to buy equipment to bolster the signal and solve the “last mile plus 10 more yards” problem — that is, getting coverage indoors.

Wi-Fi signals do not bend, and you usually can’t get much of a useful bounce from them, either. Because Wi-Fi uses unlicensed bands of the radio spectrum, by law it must rely on low-power transmitters, which reduce its ability to penetrate walls. Travel-round-the-world shortwave, this ain’t.

Trying to cover a broad area with Wi-Fi radio transmitters set atop street lights brings to mind a fad of the 1880s: attempts to light an entire town with a handful of arc lights on high towers. But overeager city boosters around the country soon discovered that shadows obscured large portions of their cities, and the lighting was not as useful as had been expected. Municipal Wi-Fi on streetlamps, another experiment with top-down delivery, may run a similarly short-lived — and needlessly expensive — course.

WiMax, which will be a high-power version of the tower approach, comes in two flavors: mobile, which has not yet been certified, and fixed, which is theoretically well suited for residential deployment. Unfortunately, it’s pricey. Peter Bell, a research analyst at TeleGeography Research in Washington, said fixed WiMax would not be able to compete against cable and DSL service: “It makes more economic sense in semirural areas that have no broadband coverage.”

An intriguingly inexpensive alternative has appeared: a Wi-Fi network that is not top-down but rather ground-level, peer-to-peer. It relies not on $3,500 radio transmitters perched on street lamps by professional installers but instead on $50 boxes that serve, depending upon population density, more than one household and can be installed by anyone with the ease of plugging in a toaster.

Meraki Networks, a 15-employee start-up in Mountain View, Calif., has been field-testing Wi-Fi boxes that offer the prospect of providing an extremely inexpensive solution to the “last 10 yards” problem. It does so with a radical inversion: rather than starting from outside the house and trying to send signals in, Meraki starts from the inside and sends signals out, to the neighbors.

Some of those neighbors will also have Meraki boxes that serve as repeaters, relaying the signal still farther to more neighbors. The company equips its boxes with software that maintains a “mesh network,” which dynamically reroutes signals as boxes are added or unplugged, and as environmental conditions that affect network performance fluctuate moment to moment.

At this time last year, two of Meraki’s co-founders — Sanjit Biswas and John Bicket — were still Ph.D. students at M.I.T., pursuing academic research on wireless mesh networks in the course of building Roofnet, an experimental network that covered about one-third of Cambridge, Mass., and offered residents free service.

Last year, Google invited Mr. Biswas to give a presentation about his experience providing wireless Internet service to low-income communities. At the time, Google was testing its first municipal Wi-Fi network in its hometown, Mountain View, Calif., using transmitters attached to street lamps.

After Mr. Biswas’s talk, a Google engineer told him that people using Google’s network said they could get online at home only by holding their laptops against a window. Mr. Biswas said he was not surprised. Using municipal Wi-Fi for residential coverage, he said, was “the equivalent of expecting street lamps to light everyone’s homes.”

Mr. Biswas and Mr. Bicket realized that their mesh-network gear designed for residential use could avoid that problem, and hasten the extension of Internet access worldwide. They founded Meraki, took a leave of absence from M.I.T. and, along with a third co-founder, Hans Robertson, moved to Silicon Valley. In short order, Google and then Sequoia Capital, one of Google’s original venture capital backers, invested in Meraki.

Moore’s Law, with its regular doubling of transistors on a single silicon chip, makes possible the miracle of a Meraki “mini,” as the company calls its basic product for the home. It contains a Wi-Fi router-on-a-chip, combined with the same microprocessor and same memory that formed the heart of a Silicon Graphics workstation 10 years ago. These components are now cheap enough today to be included in a box that sells for $49.

The fact that 200 million Wi-Fi chips will be manufactured this year leads to economies of scale that will drive down the price of extremely intelligent network equipment. Meraki’s products are still being tested, but word-of-mouth has attracted 15,000 users in 25 countries.

One early adopter was Michael Burmeister-Brown, a director of NetEquality, a nonprofit in Portland, Ore., that provides free Internet access to low-income neighborhoods. He had not been impressed by Portland’s municipal Wi-Fi service. Because the Wi-Fi transmitter has to be both close and within unobstructed view, the limitations brought to Mr. Burmeister-Brown’s mind the sign on the back of 18-wheel trucks: “If you can’t see my mirror, I can’t see you.”

In Portland, the access points were installed only at every other intersection in residential areas — creating an “I can’t see you” problem. MetroFi, the service provider, advises residents who are not close to a transmitter to buy additional equipment to pull in the signal, with a starting price of $119 — and that is without the “professional installation” option.

For NetEquality, Mr. Burmeister-Brown decided to try out the Meraki equipment in several neighborhoods. In the largest, consisting of about 400 apartments, five DSL lines were used to feed 100 Meraki boxes, which cover the complex with a ratio of one box to every four apartments. Each box both receives the signal and passes it along, albeit at diminished strength. For an initial investment of about $5,000, or $13 a household, the complex can offer Internet access whose operating costs work out to about $1 a household a month.

The bandwidth can match DSL service, but here it is throttled down a bit to deter bandwidth-hogging downloads. Nonetheless, Mr. Burmeister-Brown says everyone is able to enjoy Web browsing with what he describes as “really snappy response.” The sharing of signals among neighbors does not compromise privacy if standard Wi-Fi security protocols are switched on.

Meraki’s products are not yet for sale, and its networks have not been tested with extensive deployment across a large city. Nonetheless, the intrinsic advantages of its grass-roots approach, with next-to-nothing expenditures for both equipment and operations, are impossible to ignore.

MR. BISWAS says there are about 800 million personal computers in the world, but only 280 million are connected. The rest are “stuck in the 1980s” — close to being connected, but not quite.

Meraki does not wish to go into the Internet service provider business itself, but it aspires to equip any interested nontechnical person to become a “micro” service provider for his or her local community. If the provider wishes to use advertising to cover costs rather than charge an access fee, little would be needed in order to cover the minimal outlays for equipment and operations.

This low-cost network model offers the prospect of broadband service reaching inside many more households. One billion and one. One billion and two. One billion and three … .

Randall Stross is an author based in Silicon Valley and a professor of business at San Jose State University. E-mail: stross@nytimes.com.

Posted by M at 00:48:18 | Permalink | No Comments »

Sunday, February 4, 2007

What MapQuest and G.P.S. Don’t Tell You Can Get You Lost

By MARCIA BIEDERMAN
Published: February 4, 2007

GETTING driving directions is an easy process these days with computer software, mapping Web sites and G.P.S. systems. They will indeed get you from Point A to Point B, but they often do it in standard English, bland as a news anchor’s accent. Whether you’re headed for a Brooklyn brownstone or an Indiana office park, the route will be described as a series of intersections and turns.

For the vernacular version, inquire at a gas station. In New Jersey, you could be told to pass a jughandle. In Detroit, you could be advised to take a Michigan left. Texans could tell you to splash through a ford or take a frontage road. People in Kirkland, Wash., will warn you to watch for a pedestrian flag crossing; the city actually provides orange flags to carry in crosswalks to help drivers see walkers.

“We’re familiar with jughandles and Michigan lefts, but a lot of people aren’t,” said Christian Dwyer, director of operations for MapQuest. Regionalisms “would not be part of the MapQuest narrative.”

But they remain part of the drive in many places in the country. While these regionalisms can make directions confusing, drivers coming upon these turns and loops can become frustrated and disoriented. It may not be hard to understand what’s going on when a pedestrian waves a flag in a crosswalk, but a first encounter with a Michigan left or a jughandle can be daunting.

So some advanced knowledge would be helpful. For the perplexed, here is a field guide.

Jughandles

Craig Randall of Boise, Idaho, was certainly confused. On a business trip to New Jersey, he decided to unwind at a movie theater he could see while driving on Route 10 near Whippany. But the theater was as elusive as a mirage. He got to the intersection, but was unable to turn left from Route 10 to get to the theater.

Mr. Randall was about to discover the jughandle. It is a one-way road that loops vehicles from the right lane of a main road to a cross street where the left can be made without having to cross traffic on the main road. A jughandle is almost like an exit ramp off a highway. (An animation of this and other unconventional intersection junctions are at attap.umd.edu/UAID.php, a Web site developed by the Maryland State Highway Administration and the University of Maryland.)

So Mr. Randall, a business consultant, needed to find the jughandle for that intersection, make a right into it, then loop around to the left to get to his movie. He said the Google map he had consulted didn’t show the jughandle.

“It has a blob next to Highway 10,” he said.

Dan Stessel, a spokesman for the New Jersey Department of Transportation, said jughandles were first built in New Jersey in the late 1950s. Jughandles reduce traffic congestion and backups, he said.

“They’re well accepted in New Jersey and still relevant today,” he said.

Low-Water Crossings

If you ignore road barricades in San Antonio after a heavy rain, your car might float away. Creeks and streams in many areas of Texas are often topped with a concrete slab, rather than a bridge, where the water can rise quickly after a downpour. So if you come upon one during a strong storm, it may be best to find an alternative route.

Mitchell Welch, a corporate trainer and lifelong San Antonio resident, said he avoided the concrete crossings whenever they had water on them. “They will take your car off the road,” he said. “I don’t go near them, but some people do.”

The crossings, also called fords, are still being built in some places, including Kentucky, because they are cheaper than bridges.

The Michigan Left

“After a year, maybe I’ll stop complaining about it or just get used to it,” said Craig Gross, who moved last April from Southern California to Grand Rapids, Mich., where he is still experiencing culture shock over the median U-turn crossover. It’s often called the Michigan left because of its widespread use in that state.

Like the jughandle, the Michigan left is designed to block left turns at intersections. Drivers wishing to turn left onto a cross street from a main road must first drive past the cross street. An opening through the median is farther down the road, usually with its own turn lane. Drivers then make a U-turn at the opening, often assisted by a traffic light that stops oncoming traffic, and double back to the cross street. A Michigan left, in essence, is a legal U-turn. The theory is that the U-turn is less disruptive to traffic flow then a left-hand turn.

Mr. Gross, the pastor of an online anti-pornography ministry, XXXchurch.com, said the Michigan left had caused him to overshoot his own house and even led him to break the law.

“I end up making more illegal turns,” he said.

The Michigan left has its admirers. In North Carolina, it has been adapted into the Superstreet plan being built along Route 17 south of Wilmington. The Superstreet uses median U-turn crossovers to restrict turns from cross streets rather than the main road, “but it’s the same idea,” said Kevin Lacy, a state traffic engineer, adding that not all North Carolinians have welcomed the new design.

“It’s different, and everyone is a little concerned about different,” he said.

Frontage Roads

Another Texas tradition is the service, or frontage, road built next to a highway — thousands of miles of asphalt Mini-Me’s that offer easy access to the stores, restaurants and office parks.

So if drivers want to stop at a diner off the highway, they exit, then use the parallel frontage road to get to the restaurant.

In an effort to cut costs, the Texas Department of Transportation in 2003 proposed limiting the construction of new frontage roads. However, “the public outcry was pretty loud,” said Mark Cross, a spokesman for the transportation department, and the proposal was withdrawn.

“Texans are used to frontage roads,” Mr. Cross said. “They just did not see them going away.”

Pedestrian Flags

In more than a dozen states, including Utah, Virginia and Washington, pedestrians can carry brightly colored government-supplied flags in crosswalks to be more conspicuous.

Outsiders wonder what’s going on, but they brake. “If you’re driving and you see a person waving a flag at you, and they’re in a crosswalk, you kind of get the idea,” said David Godfrey, the transportation engineering manager of Kirkland, Wash.

He said his city’s pedestrian flag program began in the mid-1990s. At 50 locations in the city, pedestrians are encouraged to take flags from holders placed near crosswalks, hold them aloft while crossing the street, then return them to receptacles on the other side.

Some communities, including Berkeley, Calif., have abandoned their flags because few people used them and many flags were stolen. Mr. Godfrey said pedestrians in Kirkland would sometimes whirl the flags playfully while crossing, perhaps because “they’d feel foolish carrying them in a safety kind of way.”

Some of these regional oddities are finding a place in online maps. Microsoft’s Live Search maps (maps.live.com) includes a pushpin option that allows users to write pop-up captions on directions, like “Take the jughandle here to make your left.”

And MapQuest said it would also offer a way to add commentary to its maps when the company comes out with a personalizing feature later this year.

“Consumers could say,” said Mr. Dwyer of MapQuest, “ ‘This is what MapQuest tells you, but let me tell it to you another way.” ’

Posted by M at 19:41:05 | Permalink | No Comments »

Thursday, January 4, 2007

Shape of things to come

Technology is revolutionizing how furniture is made — and what pieces are headed for our living rooms. The look of the future? It’s fluid.

By David A. Keeps, Times Staff Writer
January 4, 2007

Innovations
New wave
Plain and fancy

AS piles of sawdust collect on top of a sheet of plywood in a basement workshop, Brendan Sowersby and Will Rollins of the downtown L.A. design firm 100xbetter watch an enormous Shop Sabre 4896 cut and engrave the pieces of their DB chair. The Bauhaus-influenced seat used to take a full day to make by hand. Now their $40,000 machine can cut two chairs in an hour.

“We can be at the computer designing something else or have lunch while our robot works,” says Sowersby, 36. “It’s soothing to watch it and know we’re getting exactly what we want.”

In the world of contemporary furnishings, digital technology is radically transforming not only how pieces are made, but what kind of designs will land in our homes in the years ahead. Just as the first machine lathes of the early 19th century made it possible to carve uniform curves in wood and metal, the latest generation of routers, lasers and water-jet cutters can slice and dice wood, acrylic, even solid steel into delicate filigrees and Rococo curlicues. This new technology — called computer numerical control, or CNC — is bridging the gap between the handmade and the manufactured.


“Technology is having a huge impact on how furniture is made and marketed,” says Brooke Hodge, curator of architecture and design at the Museum of Contemporary Art in Los Angeles. “And people have become more comfortable with digitally designed items made from industrial materials like plastic and resin in their homes.”

Labor-intensive designs that had been sold as expensive one-offs now can be produced en masse, with more eye-catching decorative detail — and lower prices.

“Each iteration of Tord Boontje’s folk art designs gets less expensive,” Hodge says, “but the real future of this technology is that you could customize furniture like you would a car. Instead of just picking out fabric, you could change the shape of a sofa.”

Technology, Rollins says, is redefining the art of furniture design. “Machines open the door to continue to make things that are intricate and beautiful,” he says, “in a fraction of the time.”

FIRST developed after World War II to fabricate metal components, CNC systems now work in concert with the kind of computer-assisted drawing programs that architects have used for decades. Whereas 20th century Modernists such as Isamu Noguchi and Verner Panton sketched flowing curves and amorphic forms on paper, the current generation of designers draws three-dimensional objects on their laptops.

In the 2005 book “Blobjects & Beyond: The New Fluidity in Design,” authors Steven Skov Holt and Mara Holt Skov propose that these sometimes-goofy forms are the direct result of digital design and manufacturing, leading to “new creative possibilities for the look of even the most ordinary object.”

As the London-based Future Systems proves, a bench need not be a rectangle on legs. The firm’s Drift is a rounded, lacquered wood sculpture, reminiscent of a Nike swoosh or the work of artist Henry Moore.

In the case of Fold by English designer Alex Taylor, a single piece of computer-cut metal can be bent into a lamp and its shade.

Stefan Lawrence, whose Los Angeles showroom Twentieth represents Future Systems and Taylor, believes that these early explorations in digital manufacturing will become collectibles. (The Fold lamp, in fact, was just added to the Museum of Modern Art’s international contemporary design collection.) Lawrence likens the new generation of computer-generated shapes to the emergence of Cubism in the early 20th century.

“Computers are able to design curves and shapes that look like Frank Gehry and Zaha Hadid buildings,” Lawrence says. “There really are no limits as to what designers can create and customize now that they have this technology.”

In the not-too-distant future, a computer will be able to carve a Louis XIV chair from a block of plywood, or use a blast of water to cut it out of solid steel. Here’s how: The computer will scan an image — say, a photograph of a chair from an auction catalog, or perhaps a period etching of one — and translate it into a three-dimensional model. With the aid of a human programmer, the computer code will then choreograph machinery to whittle away material into the chair’s final shape.

At the moment, there is just one hitch: No machines can cut the underside of a solid block of material. A process called stereo lithography, however, can build small-scale three-dimensional objects from the ground up out of resin or wax, which can then be used to create molds for manufacturing.

For Jason Miller, the Brooklyn-based designer of I Was Here, a table made of plastic, faux wood planks carved with CNC graffiti, these new technologies have some potential drawbacks.

“Saying that it can equal a wood carver or graffiti artist is dangerous,” he says. “Using technology to replicate an existing craft misses the point.”

Though he will use a computer to execute a piece, Miller does not design online.

“The blobists of recent fame always try to equate their shapes to nature or ergonomics when really they are making the most unnatural shapes possible,” he says. “They are just making easy-to-render digital shapes.”

DESPITE its inherent creative potential, digital design is most often used for inexpensive plastic products made through decades-old molding processes. Similarly, CNC machinery is more frequently employed to speed the production of low-cost items such as IKEA cabinets or the lacy silhouettes that Tord Boontje recently created for Target’s holiday decor.

In Los Angeles, however, a growing number of independent furniture makers are beginning to employ CNC machinery to become miniature factories, producing original designs in quantities that were impossible to achieve in years past.

“It’s all about CNC,” says Venice designer Ilan Dei. For the Ilan Dei Studio’s Namibia collection, he uses a computer-driven router on fine hardwood tables. The results, inspired by a visit to Africa, are tabletops whose sculpted patterns resemble topographical dunes and rippled water.

“It allows a designer so much freedom of expression,” Dei says of the technique. “In the past, if I wanted to do a sculptural, sensual, nature-oriented form, it was next to impossible to reproduce without a master carver.”

For 100xbetter, the technology allows accuracy and, says designer Rollins, “repeatability.” Chairs, shelves and pendant lights are made with interlocking pieces of precision-cut, half-inch plywood sheets that can be shipped flat in a box and assembled without nails or glue. “It’s empowering to be able to make the parts for a lamp and know that it’s going to fit together, no question marks,” he says.

The machine is also capable of imprinting assembly instructions directly into the surface of the furniture components or carving intricate relief work, such as a stand of bamboo engraved into a sheet of plywood.

“That’s something I would never have attempted by hand,” Rollins says.

If Rollins and Sowersby take a form-follows-function approach to computer furniture design, the Highland Park consortium known as MachineHistories follows a more theatrical path. Jason Pilarski, a professor of industrial and environmental design at the Art Center College of Design in Pasadena, and his colleagues Patrick Dachtler, Steven Joyner and Clancy Pearson gained acclaim at the international Milan furniture fair last April by exhibiting an intricate, computer-carved bed made from the countertop material Corian. “CNC technology is really prevalent in manufacturing, but not in furniture design,” Pilarski says. “People have learned how to make a buck, but they haven’t learned the aesthetics of the technology and what the machines can do.”

Joyner learned firsthand when he converted a loft on the floor above MachineHistories’ industrial shop. Using computer programs, he created a living space with a built-in DJ console and a clothing closet concealed behind a wall-sized door used as a screen for a projection TV. The apartment is also filled with experiments and prototypes, including a long, undulating dining table made from laminated sheet rock.

Downstairs in the laboratory, the designers of MachineHistories are shaggy-haired mad scientists, all in their 30s, speaking jargon and using computers to create 3-D collages that superimpose imagery such as flying birds with pixel patterns. On a recent afternoon, the team used a CNC router to gouge one design into Corian, then heated the slabs and bent them around a pipe to create lighting pendants that glowed like an alabaster relief.

The group also has produced elaborately carved mirrors that took two days to design on the computer and an hour for the CNC machine to cut out.

“It would take a year to do that kind of work by hand,” Pearson says, “and you could never get such clean lines and crisp edges.”

PERFECTION is not MachineHistories’ most important product. Oftentimes, the designers will throw a tweak into a CNC program just to see what the machine will do.

“When people talk about crafts, they talk about being able to sense the hand of the artist who makes things,” Pilarski says. “This allows them to see the hand of the machine.”

Jason Miller also uses computer tools to provoke new ways of thinking about digital design. For a piece called Scotch Magic, he laminates computer-cut pieces of frosted glass onto a solid mirror. The finished piece looks as if it has been shattered and taped back together — and serves as a reminder that perfection can lie in imperfection.

“Designers need to think of CNC technology as a craft unto itself,” he says. “It has peculiarities, both good and bad, that are uniquely its own. Ideally these will be exploited on their own merits, resulting in something entirely new and honest.”

Rollins of 100xbetter agrees.

“We didn’t buy a CNC machine to see how much time we could make and money we could save,” he says.

Then why did they buy it?

Says Rollins: “We thought, ‘That’s a crazy tool that will inspire us.’ “


david.keeps@latimes.com
Posted by M at 14:05:15 | Permalink | No Comments »

Monday, December 25, 2006

The world just about fits in this little music box

IPods can lead you on tours, give directions to restaurants, navigate the subway, plus provide that old standard: tunes.

By Logan Kugler, Special to The Times
December 24, 2006

MORE than 60 million iPods have been sold since the first model of Apple’s portable music player made its debut in 2001, giving rise to a generation hooked to — and on — its earbuds. For travelers, though, the iPod can be more than a passive plaything that keeps the world at bay.

Depending on the model, your iPod can find restaurants, juggle reservations, track down tours and attractions, help you navigate subway systems and, of course, keep you entertained.

To make it work for you while on the road, you’ll need to download listings and other information from the Internet before you leave home.


Here’s how to get more out of your iPod than the latest Snow Patrol CD. (Note: The iPod Shuffle, which has no screen, is not usable for these services):

*

Find tours and attractions

Wouldn’t it be great to have a complete guide to your destination in the palm of your hand? With programs such as AudioSteps, BlueBrolly and PodGuides, you can.

AudioSteps (www.audiosteps.com) offers digital audio walking tours of New Orleans, Philadelphia, Sacramento, San Francisco and Washington, D.C. For those traveling to London, BlueBrolly (www.bluebrolly.com ) has a great selection of audio walks for areas including Westminster, Soho, Chinatown, Greenwich, Covent Garden, St Paul’s and more.

PodGuides, at http://www.podguides.net , puts a spin on things by offering a digital map and some small pictures, along with the audio tracks explaining what you’re seeing as you walk along. It’s a new idea, so only a few guides are available on PodGuides, but the ones currently available, such as Brussels and the Opal Coast in France, are quite good. It’s like having your own tour guide.

*

Find your way around

Getting places can get confusing. So, download iSubwayMaps’ maps (www.isubwaymaps.com) before you go. Showing the underground systems for Tokyo, Chicago, San Francisco and more, they definitely come in handy and are easy to read with the video iPod’s 2 1/2 -inch screen.

Also available for download is iPod + Yahoo! (www.ipod-directions.com) Yahoo Directions, which is similar to MapQuest.

Not only do you get pictures, but you also get text describing exactly how to go. That way, you can impress your friends with your almost uncanny ability to know how to get exactly where they want to go.

They’ll think you’re a genius.

*

Getting hungry?

If your hotel doesn’t have a concierge, finding a nice local restaurant can be a challenge. You might decide to cruise the area looking for a suitable place to dine, but for those of us who aren’t as adventurous, head back up to your room and grab your iPod.

With it and Restaurant Spy (www.restaurantspy.com), you can browse hundreds of restaurant listings for almost anywhere your travels take you. But because Restaurant Spy doesn’t cover every area of the world, you can also run a search on Google for keyword “CITY NAME restaurant iPod,” which will often turn up a list of local restaurants that you can download to your iPod.

*

Keep track of reservations

Planning a big trip means handling numerous reservations. Your iPod can help. It can synchronize with your scheduling program — whether you use Microsoft Outlook on a Windows PC, or iCal on a Mac.

It’s a fairly straightforward process. Input your reservation dates and times for your trip, then sync with your iPod. When the day arrives for dinner at your favorite multi-star restaurant, your iPod will alert you. And that’s a good thing, especially when the restaurant requires a credit card to hold the reservation, as many now do.

*

That’s entertainment

Airline travel means you often have spare time on your hands where you’re doing nothing more than waiting in line at Starbucks or sitting in a cramped seat at 35,000 feet.

Having an iPod close by can help pass those in-between times. Check out features such as viewing photos, watching movies, playing games and, of course, listening to your favorite tunes. Learn more at: http://www.apple.com/support/ipod/howto/ .

Of course, don’t forget the main reason you bought your iPod in the first place. More and more chains are offering docking stations so you can listen to the music on speakers in your hotel room.

For example, Hilton is building the docks into alarm clocks being installed throughout the chain. Other chains adopting the technology include Hyatt and Marriott.

Individual hotels are also offering the service, including the Crescent in Beverly Hills and the Tribeca Grand Hotel in New York.

Posted by M at 02:19:46 | Permalink | No Comments »