Tuesday, July 24, 2007

New Orleans Recovery Is Slowed by Closed Hospitals

Fred R. Conrad/The New York Times

The emergency room at Charity Hospital was by far the busiest in New Orleans before floodwaters from Hurricane Katrina forced the evacuation of hundreds of patients and staff members. Almost two years later, the building appears almost abandoned.

By LESLIE EATON Published: July 24, 2007

NEW ORLEANS — At the tip of Bayou St. John in the Mid-City neighborhood here, the brown and white bulk of Lindy Boggs Medical Center looms behind a chain-link fence. Nineteen people died at the medical center after Hurricane Katrina, and now the hospital itself is dead, sold to developers who plan to replace it with a shopping mall.

On the surrounding streets — Bienville and Canal and Jefferson Davis — lies the wreckage of a once-bustling medical corridor. Doctors’ offices sit empty behind five-foot-high water marks, and nearby clinics wait to be demolished. In back of one medical building, a gaping refrigerator still holds jars of mayonnaise and Mt. Olive Dill Relish.

Harder to see, but just as tangible, people here say, are the other ripple effects of the flood and the closed hospital: workers displaced, houses for sale and, of course, patients forced to seek health care many miles away. If they have returned to New Orleans at all, that is, given the grave wounds to the health care system.

 

“I’ve been telling people, don’t bring your parents back if they are sick,” said Dr. David A. Myers, an internist who lived and worked in Mid-City before the flood and has moved his home and practice to the suburbs.

Of all the factors blocking the economic revival of New Orleans, the shattered health care system may be the most important — and perhaps the most intractable.

Except for tourism and retailing, health care was the city’s biggest private employer, and it paid much higher wages than hotels or stores. But there are now 16,800 fewer medical jobs than before the storm, down 27 percent, in part because nurses and other workers are in short supply.

Only one of the city’s seven general hospitals is operating at its pre-hurricane level; two more are partially open, and four remain closed. The number of hospital beds in New Orleans has dropped by two-thirds. In the suburbs, half a dozen hospitals in adjacent Jefferson Parish are open — but are packed.

Fixing the city’s health care system “is critical both for the short and the long term,” said Andy Kopplin, executive director of the Louisiana Recovery Authority. “Short-term, having confidence that the health care residents need will be available and accessible is vital for folks who are returning,” Mr. Kopplin said. “Long-term, it’s important for employers — and health care is a huge business in New Orleans.”

Studies suggest that hundreds of doctors never returned. And some of those who did, especially specialists and young physicians, are leaving, said Dr. Ricardo Febry, president of the Orleans Parish Medical Society, which has lost more than 200 of its 650 members. The exodus has “been a steady trickle,” Dr. Febry said.

The city’s mortality rate appears to have risen sharply in 2006, although state and local officials disagree about the level and persistence of the increase.

With the stress of life in the flood-ravaged city, the limited health care and insurance, the lingering mold and the discomfort of living in trailers, doctors report that the patients they see are often far sicker than those they treated before the storm. And even residents with health insurance can have a difficult time finding someone to treat them.

Government officials and civic leaders are floating plans for the future of the city’s medical system, for a state-of-the-art hospital, for a cutting-edge system to cover the uninsured, even for a “bio-innovation center” that would be an engine for economic growth. The question is what will happen in the meantime, which is likely to be many years long.

“We have to find a way to survive to that point, to provide care, or our city will collapse,” said John J. Finn, president of the Metropolitan Hospital Council of New Orleans.

Waiting for Care

The problems with health care hit hardest on the poor and the newly uninsured, but they also affect doctors and patients, politicians and entrepreneurs, the displaced and the returned — and everyone at any level who has the misfortune to turn up in a jam-packed emergency room.

Consider the case of Bernadine R. Fields, 50, who learned firsthand how far people have to go for major medical care. A supervisor of city 911 dispatchers, Ms. Fields was among the many laid off after the storm.

The money she had saved for her retirement went for repairs to her house in New Orleans East. By last July, she could no longer afford the $367 a month it cost to continue her health insurance, or all the medicines she needed to treat her high blood pressure, or the $250 it would cost to see a doctor.

So she kept ending up in one of the few open emergency rooms, waiting for hours. After one of these episodes in April, she was told she needed transfusions to treat anemia — but there was not a bed available in New Orleans for an uninsured patient.

Ms. Fields finally got the treatment she needed — but only after an ambulance took her to the state-run hospital in Baton Rouge, 80 miles from her home and family. She stayed there four days.

“I devoted 15 years of my life to serving the public,” she said, “and when I need to be served, there is no one to count on.”

Ms. Fields’s neighborhood in the eastern section of the city, like other stretches of town, cannot recover unless medical care becomes available there, officials say, and neither can large sections of the economy. Doctors and hospitals, though, are reluctant to return unless the population does.

“I’m just hoping and praying nobody dies,” said Frederick C. Young Jr., president of the Methodist Health System Foundation, which is working with the city to try to reopen a hospital there.

The sharp contraction in the health care industry has economic effects, too, for coffee shops and florists and medical-supply companies. Marshall F. Gerson, whose family has owned the Ellgee Uniform Shop downtown for almost 70 years, said sales of scrubs and other medical uniforms had fallen to about half their pre-storm level.

“At this time of day when times were good, it was bustle-bustle here,” said Mr. Gerson, 63, standing in his shop late one recent afternoon. Now, “the foot traffic is almost nil.”

By working harder and selling more industrial and restaurant uniforms, Mr. Gerson has kept his business going but, he said, “I’m not a happy person when I get home.”

An Era’s End

The future of Mr. Gerson’s shop — and in many ways the future of health care in New Orleans — is bound up in the thorny question of what if anything will replace the hospital known as Big Charity.

Since it opened in 1939, Charity Hospital’s imposing building downtown has provided basically all the medical care — emergency, acute and basic — for the city’s poor, and served as a training ground for generations of doctors.

Despite some community protests, Louisiana State University, which ran the hospital, closed it permanently after the storm, saying it was too damaged by basement flooding. The state plans to replace it with a $1.2 billion complex that officials believe will attract insured patients as well as the poor, will also care for veterans and will serve as an economic catalyst for the city. But the hospital’s future is now the subject of a debate about the best use of federal health care dollars, even after the state agreed to pay $300 million to get the project off the ground.

The federal government would prefer that the state build a small hospital and use its federal dollars to buy private insurance for the poor. Dr. Frederick P. Cerise, the secretary of Louisiana’s Department of Health and Hospitals, said that plan would help less than half of the uninsured.

On a positive note, the city’s trauma center, which treats gunshot wounds and other serious emergencies, reopened in February at University Hospital downtown, which like Charity is part of the Medical Center of Louisiana at New Orleans. But the number of beds at University remains limited, and the building is so outdated that it will eventually have to be replaced, said Dr. Cathi Fontenot, the medical director.

In the meantime, the sick have to go somewhere. Often, that somewhere is Ochsner Medical Center, a huge private hospital complex in the western suburb of Metairie that looks like a mall, with a computerized grand piano that entertains patrons in a sunny atrium.

Before Hurricane Katrina, patients waited just 20 minutes to be seen, said Dr. Joseph Guarisco, chairman of emergency services at Ochsner, and surveys found that 99 percent were satisfied with their care.

After the storm, the number of people coming to the emergency room jumped, on some days reaching nearly twice the pre-hurricane volume. The number of psychiatric patients soared.

The uninsured, who had made up a small percentage of emergency patients at Ochsner, began accounting for more than a quarter of emergency room patients. Waiting times routinely topped an hour. The patient satisfaction rate fell to 34 percent.

This year, Dr. Guarisco reorganized the emergency room and cut the waiting time back to about 20 minutes.

But the other problems remain. “The hospital, post-Katrina, struggled financially,” Dr. Guarisco said, “and it still struggles to this day.”

Bad Time for a Fracture

No one thinks that emergency rooms are a good way to provide basic everyday health care, but government efforts to attract doctors and to open more neighborhood clinics have gotten off to a slow start.

Volunteers and nonprofit groups are trying to fill the breach, treating thousands of patients a month in more than a dozen low-cost clinics in the city. In many ways, the clinics have been a success for their patients, as they are elsewhere in the country, but they represent just a drop in the city’s ocean of medical need, health officials say.

Some were open before the storm but have expanded; others are new, like the Common Ground Health Clinic, which provides free medical care four days a week in an old corner store in the Algiers neighborhood, across the Mississippi from the French Quarter. People wait outside in the heat for the clinic to open, and it is always jammed.

One recent Tuesday, the patients included a city employee with a neck problem, a college student with uncontrolled menstrual bleeding, a bartender with high blood pressure and glaucoma, and Nellie M. Lindsey, 54, a scrap hauler who was suffering from what she called “cancer stones.”

Before the storm, Ms. Lindsey said, she would have sought treatment at Charity, but she is so happy with the Common Ground clinic — despite the long waits — that she took her adult sons and daughter there for checkups.

Most of the people who come to the clinic hold at least one job, and many are working two, said Anne Mulle, a family nurse practitioner who came from California after the storm to help and ended up staying.

In addition to longstanding problems like hypertension, diabetes and heart disease, most patients have anxiety, depression and stress, which are even harder to treat, the clinic staff says.

“We can take the health piece off your worry list,” said Dr. Ravi Vadlamudi, a Tulane University doctor who serves as the clinic’s volunteer medical director. “But we can’t get you a better job market or housing market; we can’t do anything about the schools; we can’t do much with police problems. I can’t do anything about most of what bothers you.”

For patients who need more complicated care, including mammograms, stress tests and vision treatments, the clinic can make referrals to St. Thomas Community Health Center, which Dr. Donald T. Erwin founded in 1987. The fact that clinics are now collaborating — and recently qualified for federal financing — is a new and welcome development in what can seem like a bleak medical landscape, Dr. Erwin said.

Another change he has seen, he said, is that even people with insurance are having a hard time finding doctors, getting tests and continuing prescriptions, so are turning up at his clinic, where they now make up about a quarter of the patients.

“Before the storm?” Dr. Erwin continued, and held a thumb and forefinger together to make a zero.

Counseling and mental health treatment are notoriously hard to find in New Orleans these days, and doctors say this is an especially bad time to break a leg, given the shortage of orthopedists.

Even patients with the means to pay and doctors who have returned can face long waits for treatment. Dr. Myers, the internist who used to practice in Mid-City, said recently that a new patient would probably have to wait two months for an appointment, though he would find a way to get existing patients in sooner. He estimates that 80 percent of those patients have returned.

Dr. Myers said he had been trying for months to lure another doctor to the area to join his practice.

“This is a great opportunity for people who have courage,” he said.

So far, he has found no takers.

Posted by M at 17:07:17 | Permalink | No Comments »

Conflict grows over Griffith recovery plan

The fire-ravaged park is sprouting new plant life. Differing ideas on how to protect that growth are dividing Los Angeles officials and activists.
By Ashraf Khalil, Times Staff Writer’ July 24, 2007

Hiking through Griffith Park burn areaGriffith Park makes a comeback

Griffith Park looks like it can’t wait to come back.

Fresh clumps of red-fringed chaparral, sustained on the moisture from dew and fog, already dot the park’s ash-covered hillsides. Bursts of new growth resembling unkempt beards can be seen on trees that were left bare by the May 8 wildfires.

As the park’s plant life returns, city officials are working out the next formal stage of the Griffith Park recovery.


City Councilman Tom LaBonge, whose 4th District includes the park, is among those who oppose the Department of Recreation and Parks keeping many hiking trails closed through the fall.

LaBonge has lobbied parks department General Manager Jon Mukri to open up more trails, particularly the routes to Mt. Hollywood and Bee Rock.

Parks Planning Director Michael Shull said his department was determined not to move too quickly — especially since many of the trails that might soon be reopened would have to be closed in September when rehabilitation work is to begin.

“I don’t think we want to move forward until we have a complete plan in place,” Shull said.

A formal proposal is expected to come before the City Council in the next few weeks.

Erosion control tops the list of short-term priorities — workers must shore up weakened hillsides to prevent mudslides during the rainy season.

Shull’s department is preparing to open bids in August for companies to perform hydro-mulching on selected Griffith Park hillsides. The process involves spraying a mixture of wood pulp and polymers from tanker trucks or helicopters. The liquid hardens into a shell “like a pie crust,” Shull said.

“It’s a proven slope-protection measure,” he said. “It should take us through the rainy season and plant life can still grow through it.”

Other key elements of the plan include installing so-called K-rails, concrete barriers that will divert water and mud; and adding “debris fences,” which will allow water to pass but stop solid objects.

Funding for the coming implementation phase would come from $2 million the city allocated shortly after the fires. Shull said those funds should cover the immediate plans. But funding for the later stages — estimated to cost up to $50 million and continue through 2010 — has yet to be formalized.

Several city officials stressed in interviews that they were only planning hydro-mulching, not hydro-seeding — a similar process that contains plant seeds in the spray mixture. If officials considered reseeding, it could bring protests from neighborhood activists and park enthusiasts who favor allowing the park’s plant life to recover at its own pace.

The city’s recovery plans are being closely monitored by a coalition of community activists.

A volunteer team known as the Griffith Park Master Plan Working Group is finalizing a proposed strategy for the park’s long-term future. The plan, which group members said would be presented in the fall, is expected to promote a purist vision of Griffith Park as an unspoiled “Urban Wilderness Area” with minimal development and a ban on the planting of nonnative plant life.

The group’s desires probably will conflict with competing visions for the park. After the fire, City Councilman Ed Reyes said officials should consider making the park more accessible, suggesting a bike trail leading directly into the park.

In 2005, a city plan that was quickly shelved in the face of community opposition proposed adding baseball fields and parking garages at the edges of the park along with two air tram lines — one to the Griffith Observatory; the other to Toyon Vista.

One potentially controversial aspect of the working group’s proposal: a ban on any sort of independent planting or gardening outside of tightly defined areas. A grandfather clause in the group’s proposal calls for three iconic sites — Amir’s Garden, Dante’s View and Captain’s Roost — to be permitted planting areas.

“These areas are not consistent with the park’s Urban Wilderness Identity, but are tolerated because of the folk nature of each area,” the proposal states. “Any park management must ensure that no further nonnative gardens of this type are developed in the park.”

But the patchwork aspect of Griffith Park is, for many, a key element of its personality. Current fixtures such as Dante’s View began as unauthorized gardens where residents planted and maintained their own trees or plants — including species alien to Southern California.

Working group member Gerry Hans, who helped write the clause on nonnative gardens, said he believed the introduction of alien plants could be harmful to Griffith Park.

LaBonge, meanwhile, remains a proponent of the air tram from the Greek Theatre to the Griffith Observatory, one of several stances that already have brought him into conflict with the working group. The councilman concedes ongoing tensions with certain group members but declares himself “in sync with 90% to 95%” of the working group’s positions.

He emphasized that any plan for Griffith Park should take into account the needs of all city residents because it accounts for more than a quarter of the city’s parkland.

“Some of the activists may not have a full appreciation of the diversity of the population of Los Angeles,” and the different ways they use and appreciate the park,” LaBonge said.

Posted by M at 16:47:45 | Permalink | No Comments »

Sea wall stops, yet makes, waves

Long Beach council is to vote on whether to study tearing down the breakwater.
By Tami Abdollah, Times Staff Writer July 24, 2007


Protective barrierCalling cardBefore the breakwater

Decades ago, Long Beach was something of a surfing mecca, with wave-pounding beaches where legends like Duke Kahanamoku held the first national surf contest in 1938.

About nine miles of solid rock changed that.


The breakwater, a 50-foot-high wall of rock built by the Army Corps of Engineers in the 1940s, stopped the waves. And by creating a protective barrier, the wall allowed the Port of Long Beach and surrounding marinas to expand and thrive.

For generations, surfers and environmentalists have sought to “break the breakwater” and bring waves back to the Long Beach coast.

That’s still a distant dream. But the City Council is expected to decide whether to fund a study on reconfiguring the roughly two-mile peninsula area breakwater, which lies at the east end of the city away from the huge port complex.

The study, which could cost up to $100,000, will look at the feasibility of removing a portion of the rock wall and the effect that would have on the pricey homes along the Long Beach peninsula, where residents have long seen the breakwater as protection against storms and flooding.

Environmentalists argue the breakwater bottles up urban pollution from the Los Angeles and San Gabriel rivers, creating some of the worst beach water quality in Southern California.

“Most people go to Long Beach, see what it is and go to Huntington Beach or someplace else,” said Seamus Innes, 38, a coastal engineer and member of the Surfrider Foundation. Innes has been surfing for more than 25 years, but he rarely tries to do so in Long Beach. “I was able to see some waves in April, but I was at lunch from work.”

Opposition is already forming from residents of Belmont Shore, Naples and the peninsula, who worry their homes would be flooded by heavy storms if left without the breakwater’s protection. Even with the breakwater, some residents of the peninsula say their homes experience a heavy bashing when it rains.

“I experienced the problems when we’ve had heavy wave action, and I watched the alleys and streets get flooded in my district,” said Frank Colonna, a former council member and resident of the city’s peninsula area. Colonna was also the lone vote against approving the study two years ago.

Colonna said he was skeptical about the environmental benefits of reworking the breakwater. Though such a move might increase water circulation, it could also serve to circulate and dilute existing pollution.

“You have to be careful of what you are wishing for,” Colonna said, “because the outcome could be significantly different from what you expect.”

Through the 1930s, the coast of Long Beach was fully exposed to the ocean’s wrath — and that became a calling card. Hotels, ornate apartment towers and the Pike amusement park were built around the beaches, making the city a top tourist spot and location for surf competitions.

But slowly, the rock wall about 2 1/2 miles off the coast began going up to protect against storms and safely house the Navy’s Pacific Fleet, which anchored within the breakwater until the mid-1990s.

The breakwater, which took about 50 years to complete, is composed of three segments. About two miles of it lie in front of the Long Beach peninsula, and the rock itself was brought over from Santa Catalina Island, said Long Beach port spokesman Art Wong.

The Long Beach port is tucked behind the wall of rock — 200 feet wide at its base and 20 feet wide at its top.

The breakwater “provides a safe harbor for ships here, and without it I don’t know if they could have built this complex,” Wong said. “It allowed them to build this land out in the water, and it protects the ships so they’re not being jostled around” while they unload. The Harbor Commission has not taken a position on the issue, he said.

Surfers launched their “Sink the Breakwater” campaign more than a decade ago, pointing out that many big surfing competitions take place only a few miles south in Huntington Beach, labeling itself “Surf City.”

“I think it’s time for the city to take a step forward and get the answers,” said Councilwoman Rae Gabelich, who is helping push the measure. “Is it possible for us to do this? Will it damage any of the homes? … Is it a mistake or will it be advantageous to the city of Long Beach to be the draw we said we wanted to be for the tourist industry?”

Two years ago, the council approved a study, by an 8-1 vote, to look at the breakwater’s role and the ramifications of removing it. But the study stalled because of a lack of funding.

This time, council members and activists blame Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R-Huntington Beach) for being unwilling to secure federal funding for the study. But Rohrabacher, whose district includes Long Beach, said he told the council to reorder its priorities for federal funding and place the breakwater at the top of its list.

“I’ve never opposed it,” Rohrabacher said. “Everybody supports asking to get something for nothing…. They have to set the priorities.”

Even if the funding for the initial study by the corps is approved tonight, nearly everyone agrees that the process would take years to complete.

“I still have another 40 years of surfing in me,” Innes said. “So I think it could be done in my lifetime. But it might not be standing-up surfing, I might be boogying.”

Posted by M at 16:46:12 | Permalink | No Comments »

An L.A. big enough for tiny apartments

Planners propose units as small as 250 square feet. After all, New York and Paris have them.
By Sharon Bernstein, Times Staff Writer; July 24, 2007

Mine is a tiny place, not somewhere you would want to entertain or bring people.

Martin Eng, who rents a 300-square-foot studio in San Francisco’s swanky Nob Hill

Is Los Angeles ready for the 250-square-foot apartment?

That’s what city planning officials have in mind with a series of sweeping new zoning proposals that would allow developers to build smaller condos and apartments than ever before.

The tiny units — studios that officials hope would be as small as 250 square feet — are part of a package of proposed zoning changes aimed at significantly increasing density in downtown L.A. The rules would apply to the roughly five miles around downtown but could eventually be extended elsewhere in the city.

The idea is to encourage developers to continue to build high-rises downtown even as the market appears poised to slow down — while also spurring them to build units that are more affordable. Supporters — who include the city’s top planning officials, some developers and Councilwoman Jan Perry, whose district includes downtown — say the rules will encourage the construction of housing at a time when the city desperately needs it.

“This is a landmark event,” said Dan Rosenfeld, a principal in the development firm Urban Partners, which is behind several downtown projects. “The people who care about downtown L.A. have been waiting for these ordinances for a long time.”

But the proposal — slated to come before the City Council next week — is already drawing criticism from those who see it as another effort to boost development in a region that is already in a high-rise building boom stretching from downtown through Koreatown and into Century City, Westwood and Marina del Rey.

Some land-use experts question whether there is much of a market for tiny apartments in downtown L.A., which, despite its recent resurgence, still lacks the cachet of Manhattan, central London or Paris. Others fear overcrowding and slum conditions if the market goes sour and the units are too densely packed.

“I see it as creating a neighborhood where parking is horrendous and families are squeezing themselves into these units which are very small because they are affordable,” said Noreen McClendon, a developer of affordable housing. “It’s just a tenement.”

The tiny apartment is a fairly new concept in Southern California, which has a long history of suburban sprawl and larger spaces.

But in New York, Boston, San Francisco and many European and Asian cities, residents have squeezed into tiny apartments for decades, usually because the lure of the downtown area is so great — and the prices for larger places so high.

Gretchen Broussard, who co-owns Tiny Living, a Manhattan store that sells furnishings for small spaces, lived in a 200-square-foot apartment in that New York borough until five years ago.

“I couldn’t even turn around in the space,” Broussard said. “I maxed out every inch of the wall space, mounted everything to get it off the floor … “

In San Francisco, Martin Eng rents a 300-square-foot studio in the swanky Nob Hill neighborhood, across from the Ritz-Carlton hotel. Though Eng has several other homes around the state, the apartment is his primary residence — and he said it’s livable only because it has a good view and plenty of light.

With a rent-controlled cost of $400 a month — below the market rate — the studio is a convenient city crash pad for Eng, 53, who works in investment.

“Mine is a tiny place, not somewhere you would want to entertain or bring people,” Eng said. “It’s like a poor man penthouse — you can’t really be proud of it.”

Although the new L.A. ordinance does not directly address the size of the apartments that could be built, it would remove all restrictions on the number of units that developers could put in a single building, a move that planners hope will result in residences as small as 250 square feet — about the size of a hotel room or a modest living room.

The ordinance would also let developers willing to reserve some apartments for low- and moderate-income families to make their buildings 35% bigger than zoning rules normally allow and to opt out of providing half the open space typically required. Those who build units for those with very low incomes would not have to offer parking spaces for those residences.

Perry said the proposed rules would concentrate new housing downtown while preserving single-family homes elsewhere.

The smallest units, Perry said, might be attractive to young professionals who want to buy a condo but can’t afford anything larger, or to service workers who couldn’t otherwise afford to buy or rent near their downtown jobs.

Burbank architect Mark Gangi, who also teaches at USC, said the rules could help mold downtown into a lively metropolitan center.

The new apartments might be used by those who need an affordable place to live, he said, but they might also become pieds-à-terre for professionals and others who want a modest place where they can stay overnight if they are working or seeing a show or ballgame.

But others are more skeptical about how tiny units would fare in Los Angeles.

Raphael Bostic, associate director of the Lusk Center for Real Estate at USC, said developers might take advantage of the city’s offer to let them build affordable units without parking spaces, because the cost of such parking can be prohibitive. “Only the most adventurous would do the very small units,” he said.

Jeff Lee, a developer active in the downtown area, said he was doubtful there’d be a market for 250-square-foot apartments or condos. “That wouldn’t be much more than a bathroom and 10-by-10 bedroom,” said Lee, who built the Market Lofts downtown.

Jane Blumenfeld, L.A.’s principal city planner, said that in cities like New York and San Francisco, people live happily in tiny apartments and condos.

But Joel Kotkin, an urban affairs expert, questioned whether such units would help the city’s goal of creating a feeling of community downtown.

“You’re creating tiny spaces that people live in for short periods of time,” Kotkin said.

L.A.’s downtown is still not desirable enough to entice well-heeled purchasers to buy or rent a studio when they can live in a larger place elsewhere, Kotkin said.

“They say that in New York and San Francisco people live [in small apartments] a long time. Well, downtown L.A., you’re not New York and you’re not San Francisco.”

Posted by M at 16:24:35 | Permalink | No Comments »