Friday, May 25, 2007

A wrecking ball for Beijing’s history

As property prices spiral upward in Beijing, some tenants in the city’s 600-year-old hutong alleyways are rushing to cash in on their neighborhoods’ destruction.

On the latest of Beijing’s ancient lanes to be scheduled for demolition, a tale of two cities is unfolding. Their diverging stories have probably sealed the leafy alleyway’s fate.

At No. 21, Li Xiaoling cannot wait for the bulldozers to roll up. After 17 years living with her daughter in a decrepit one-room rental shack thrown up in the middle of an old courtyard “this is a good chance for us to improve our living conditions,” she says.

A few doors down, Xia Jie is determined to defend the traditional “four-walled yard” house that she inherited from her grandfather. “It is Beijing’s cultural heritage,” she says defiantly, “and it’s my private property.”

 

The conflicting interests of renters crammed into slumlike corners of the old yards on one hand, and owner-occupiers seeking to protect their patrimony on the other, makes a common front unlikely among the 90 families facing eviction from Dongsi Batiao street.

But if recent experience in Beijing’s 600-year-old hutongs is any guide, neither side can expect much satisfaction from the developer who wants to raze their homes.

To the dismay of conservationists, the historic hutongs – serried ranks of grey-brick, single-story courtyard homes with elegantly curving tiled eaves – are shrinking fast. Where more than 3,000 such lanes stood at the time of the 1949 revolution, only 1,559 had survived by 2003, according to the capital’s urban planning committee. Several hundred more have been destroyed in recent years.

City ordinances drafted to protect the capital’s historic heritage have been brushed aside by developers who are in league with local officials in search of profits, experts complain.

“There has been some enforcement of rules protecting preservation zones, but not always,” says Hou Zhaonian, deputy director of the Beijing Ancient Architecture Research Institute, a branch of the city government. “There are a lot of ‘interesting’ relationships between the authorities and property developers.”

On Dongsi Batiao Ms. Xia, whose vocal defense of her house has attracted widespread attention from Chinese journalists and bloggers, says she found evidence of such collusion when the developer seeking to evict her called her on her private cellphone number.

Investigating this breach of her privacy, she says, she found that the local government heating bureau had provided the company with details of all residents on the street.

Tenants fight for more compensation

The latest threat to a hutong has sparked protest because Dongsi Batiao runs along the edge of a preservation zone full of similar lanes. The property developer had announced that it plans to build a European-style residential and commercial complex on the site. That would violate laws that limit construction in controlled “buffer zones” near preservation areas.

In an interview this week, Bai Hua, vice president of the Zhong Bao Jia Ye development company, said his firm’s design had changed. It now includes nine replica courtyard houses along the lane, backed by two six-story buildings containing apartments and offices “in Chinese traditional style … colors and materials,” he claimed.

Those plans appear to be within the law, conservation experts say. But Mr. Bai was unable to provide architects’ drawings or an artist’s impression of the scheme, saying his company “is still adjusting the design.”

Xia does not find such vagueness reassuring. “Lots of things have changed since 1999,” she says, when the developer first earmarked the site for construction and then knocked down all the hutong buildings in the lane immediately to the north of Dongsi Batiao, including a Ming dynasty temple.

The fate of the area’s heritage, however, is of secondary importance to most local residents. Not only do the shoddily built and overcrowded lean-to’s and extensions where most of them live conceal the courtyards’ original elegance; they are miserable to live in, with no toilets or bathrooms.

Unsurprisingly they are delighted by Bai’s promise that his firm will pay them enough compensation “to buy a comfortable space to live, a much better place.”

That is not what they say they have been offered, however. “Ninety percent of the people here agree with the demolition,” says a resident who identified himself only as Huang. “But the compensation is too little to buy anywhere else” given Beijing’s rocketing real estate prices.

With the 8,090 RMB ($1,057) per square meter that the lane’s occupants say the developer proposed, “I couldn’t afford to buy anything, except maybe in Inner Mongolia,” scoffed one resident.

While renters prepare to bargain with the developer, none of the seven homeowners facing eviction is ready to budge, says Xia, the only one among them willing to talk in public.

She hired a lawyer this week, and plans to go to court to challenge the eviction order that was posted on a wall last month. “Everything about this is so illegal,” she argues. “I feel like I’m dealing with criminals.”

Even if she loses her appeal at the district level, she says, she will go on fighting the developer. “There is a whole legal procedure,” she points out. “All this takes time.”

The developer’s original deadline for residents to move out – set in the eviction poster for Saturday, six weeks after it first appeared – has slipped, Bai says. “Because of negative reports in some media, our timetable has been affected,” he explains. “Now it depends on the development of the whole situation.”

A wrench in developers’ gears

Xia admits that she doubts she will be able to prevent the destruction of her house for ever, but takes grim consolation in her feeling that “even if I have to lose, this is a no-win game for the developers. Either they lose their money or they lose their image,” she says.

In the end, say activists, delaying a demolition order or saving an individual courtyard here or there is all that they generally succeed in doing, as the pressures of city development mount.

“What we do is like throwing eggs at a rock,” acknowledges Zhang Wei, founder of the “Old Beijing” website, which defends hutongs against developers. “We cannot win, but we can make things messy for them.”

Meanwhile, on Dongsi Batiao, the renters hope that the developer’s offer of compensation is just a bargaining position. “They are just saying that,” says Mrs. Li, collapsing on the bed she shares with her daughter after a fruitless afternoon apartment hunting. “They will have to give us more than that if they want us to leave.”

If they don’t, and the bulldozers arrive anyway, it would not be the first time hutong dwellers have been forcibly evicted in Beijing. “If I am brave they won’t be able to do anything, and if I’m not, they will tear it all down,” jokes Mr. Huang, bitterly. “But all most of us can do is cry.”

Posted by M at 21:54:37 | Permalink | No Comments »

D.C. in Talks to Bring Nordstrom to Georgetown

Mall Deal Could Open Other Shops

By Nikita Stewart; Washington Post Staff Writer; Friday, May 25, 2007; D04

Nordstrom and a prominent local developer are negotiating to bring the high-end department store chain to a shopping mall in Georgetown, and the District could contribute at least $20 million to the deal, D.C. officials said yesterday.

The new store would be part of a major remodeling planned for the Shops at Georgetown Park, at M Street and Wisconsin Avenue NW, the officials said. The mall houses an H&M clothing store, Victoria’s Secret, the upscale Dean & Deluca, a number of other stores and a branch of the Department of Motor Vehicles.

Council members Jack Evans (D-Ward 2) and Kwame R. Brown (D-At Large) said they discussed the plan at a meeting this week with representatives of Seattle-based Nordstrom and Western Development Corp., which took control of the mall in March. It would be the first Nordstrom in the District, though the chain has six stores in the capital region.

The meeting took place in Las Vegas during the convention of the International Council of Shopping Centers, an annual conference that attracts city officials and developers. Mayor Adrian M. Fenty (D), Evans, Brown and other council members attended.

Evans, discussing the deal, said Georgetown Park has struggled recently and could benefit from Nordstrom’s entry. “It needs an anchor,” he said.

Western Development is reported to be planning major changes to upgrade the mall, which was built in the 1980s. A Western spokesman confirmed the negotiations but said Herbert S. Miller, a company official, could not be reached for further comment.

Michael Boyd, a spokesman for Nordstrom, said the chain does not discuss negotiations until a letter of intent has been signed. But generally speaking, “when we are looking at a location, we’re looking for strong competition,” he said. “We look for a location . . . that already has entertainment and restaurants that draw customers.”

The description fits Georgetown, a major tourist attraction in the District known for its restaurants and nightlife.

The possible redevelopment of Georgetown Park could also include new shops, as well as new restaurants along the Chesapeake & Ohio Canal on the southern boundary of the mall, Evans said.

Brown said discussions about the project had focused on a design that would be in character with Georgetown, a community of brick sidewalks, townhouses and mansions.

Meanwhile, D.C. officials discussed financial support to help the project. “We’re looking at different kinds of subsidy,” Evans said.

Officials compared the case with the construction of Gallery Place — the successful Chinatown development of condominiums, restaurants, a movie theater and bowling alley — built with the help of $73.6 million in bonds sold through the tax increment financing (TIF) program.

D.C. officials discussed a possible TIF for the Georgetown project as one of a number of other developments around the city, including Fort Totten and Shaw.

The program allows the D.C. government to sell bonds, which are later repaid by the development’s taxes. A potential problem with the new development involves an ongoing conflict with Western Development. Miller sued the District last year for $40 million after D.C. officials abandoned his plan to develop a mix of condominiums and shops above parking garages at the new baseball stadium for the Washington Nationals along the Anacostia River.

Nordstrom opened its first store in the Washington region at Tysons Corner in 1988 and most recently opened a store at Dulles Town Center in 2002, Boyd said. Other local stores are in Pentagon City, Montgomery Mall in Bethesda, Annapolis and Columbia.

The chain, which has 155 stores in 27 states, reported $8.6 billion in sales in the 2006 fiscal year, and profit of $1.1 billion.

“We generally locate in suburban areas, but were are in some downtowns,” Boyd said, including Seattle, San Francisco and Portland, Ore.

Posted by M at 19:56:03 | Permalink | No Comments »

In Market, Hopes for Health and Urban Renewal

Mike Mergen for The New York Times

Alexander Faynberg says he expects his food vending business will improve as Progress Plaza is renovated.

By ERIK ECKHOLM; Published: May 25, 2007

PHILADELPHIA — It seems that anyone you talk to in the streets around Progress Plaza, a tattered shopping center in a mainly black, poor part of North Philadelphia, is excited.

Mike Mergen for The New York Times
Carol Smith says she looks forward to having fresh food closer than the 12 blocks she now has to walk.

There has not been a supermarket nearby since the last one in the plaza suddenly shut down in 1999, part of a nationwide flight from blighted urban areas by many large chains.

But soon a large Fresh Grocer supermarket is set to open here.

 

“Everybody will be so happy to see a new store,” said Anna Keller, a retired nurse’s aide, as she took home a large bag of items from Popeyes, the fast-food chicken restaurant, in the plaza. In the last seven years, Ms. Keller said, she has driven miles away to shop “because the food around here isn’t worth buying.” But that also means that she has shopped less frequently and often relied on takeout.

“I know I’ll eat better,” she said, talking about the ready access to aisles of fresh produce and meats. “I know this greasy food is killing me.”

Carol Smith, 50, who sat on the stoop of her apartment in a rundown row house, minding her five grandchildren, said she felt the same way. Like many of her neighbors, Ms. Smith does not drive, and she has been walking the 12 blocks to the nearest grocery store, then paying a livery car to drive her back. “It’s hard to keep real fresh things around,” she said.

Depopulation and the loss of industrial jobs in recent decades have taken an especially harsh toll in this neighborhood. They left row houses abandoned or in disrepair, and vacant lots strewn with trash, broken whiskey pints and hypodermic needles. Progress Plaza, which was founded with great hopes in the 1960s by an association of black residents, fell on hard times. Even mom-and-pop stores are rare.

Subsidized development is starting to bring in new houses and families, a longtime development of black-owned homes has survived to the east of the plaza, and nearby Temple University is expanding. But still, within a half-mile radius of the plaza, 39 percent of people live below the poverty line, more than twice the rate for Philadelphia over all.

Whether easy access to the bounties of a supermarket will actually transform eating habits remains to be seen, but the fight against obesity has become a major rationale, along with lower prices and the promotion of wider retail development, for efforts to bring supermarkets to what have been called the food deserts of poor urban areas.

The National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences has sponsored a before-and-after study of eating habits around the future supermarket here, looking especially to see if consumption of fresh fruits and vegetables, rather than chips and soda, will rise.

The new grocery store is part of a broader renovation of the plaza, aided by millions in public and private loans. The store was lured here by the Fresh Food Financing Initiative, which has subsidized development of two dozen supermarkets in deprived urban and rural areas of Pennsylvania and is considered a national model. The Legislature put up seed money and joined forces with the Food Trust, a private group that promotes healthy diets, and the Reinvestment Fund, which marshals money for community development. The initiative provides cash grants of up to $250,000 and, sometimes, millions of dollars in loans to prospective supermarket developers.

In the case of Progress Plaza, inducements were needed in part because the lot of the former store, at 18,000 square feet, was far too small for today’s supermarket model, said Pat Burns, who owns other stores in the city and will operate the new one here. Most of the plaza is being rebuilt to make room for a flashy 46,000-square-foot market with rooftop parking.

More generally, supermarket operators say, moving into a blighted neighborhood brings special costs and risks that can be partly overcome through subsidies and advice from groups like the Food Trust.

Jeff Brown said he was encouraged to build a ShopRite in another part of Philadelphia by a $250,000 grant from the Food Initiative, which he used to train local workers, many of whom had never held real jobs.

Store operators in poor areas say they have substantially higher security costs and, in contrast to suburban chains that carry essentially the same inventories in all stores, they must stock a variety of lower-volume items geared to multiethnic tastes. Because many customers are poor, a new store must be in a heavily populated area with convenient public transportation if it is to be profitable, they said.

On Broad Street, the supermarket and plaza will have 24-hour lighting, and “that will do a lot for the sense of safety and community in the neighborhood,” said Wendell R. Whitlock, chairman of the association that owns Progress Plaza and has received loans for the overhaul. “This is going to be a happening,” Mr. Whitlock said of the new store, and should give a boost to the area’s renewal.

When Pathmark opened the first supermarket in decades in East Harlem, in 1999, many local store owners were fearful. But by drawing in more shoppers, the entire neighborhood was uplifted, local residents and economists say.

Around Progress Plaza, no one admits to being worried.

Taufiiq Colbert, who just opened a barbershop west of Broad Street, said he expected the increased foot traffic to help his own struggling business.

Even Alexander Faynberg, who has for years sold a small sampling of fruits, nuts and eggs from a truck next to Progress Plaza, said he welcomed a new store. “It will bring in a lot of people,” Mr. Faynberg said. “It will be good for me.”

Posted by M at 19:41:22 | Permalink | No Comments »

Cemeteries Seek Breathing Clientele

R.J. Mickelson for The New York Times

Oakwood Cemetery in Troy, N.Y., held a daffodil brunch in one of its chapels recently as a way to raise money for reconstruction and upkeep. More Photos>

By PATRICIA LEIGH BROWN; Published: May 25, 2007

PHILADELPHIA — The dinner was first-class, with butlers serving hors d’oeuvres and the strains of “Blue Danube” tastefully muffling the festive din. This nine-course re-creation of the last supper aboard an ill-fated ocean liner was the culmination of Titanic Day at Laurel Hill Cemetery, one of a growing number of historic cemeteries to rebrand themselves as destination necropolises for weekend tourists.

 

Graveyard Travels
Andrew Councill for The New York Times
At a festival at the Congressional Cemetery in Washington last weekend, there was a parade for dogs dressed in historical costumes.
R.J. Mickelson for The New York Times
In addition to brunch, Oakwood will stage a Renaissance fair this summer, complete with jousting matches.

 

Historic cemeteries, desperate for money to pay for badly needed restorations, are reaching out to the public in ever more unusual ways, with dog parades, bird-watching lectures, Sunday jazz concerts, brunches with star chefs, Halloween parties in the crematory and even a nudie calendar.

Laurel Hill, the resting place of six Titanic victims, promotes itself as an “underground museum.” The sold-out Titanic dinner, including a tour of mausoleums, joined the “Dead White Republicans” tour (“the city’s power brokers, in all their glory and in all their shame”), the “Birding Among the Buried” tour, and “Sinners, Scandals and Suicides,” including a visit to the grave of “a South Philly gangster who got whacked when he tried to infiltrate the Schuylkill County numbers racket.”

As Americans choose cremation in record numbers, Victorian cemeteries like Laurel Hill and Green-Wood in Brooklyn are repositioning themselves for the afterlife: their own. Repositories of architectural and sculptural treasures, like Tiffany windows and weeping marble maidens atop tombs, the cemeteries face dwindling endowments, years of vandalism and neglect, shrinking space for new arrivals and a society that, until recently, collectively distanced itself from their meandering byways.

Although their individual circumstances vary — Green-Wood in Brooklyn, a newly crowned National Historic Landmark, has space for two more years of in-ground burial, while Laurel Hill is virtually full — what they share is a daunting number of tombs in need of repair. Woodlawn, in the Bronx, the final home of Whitneys, a Woolworth, Jay Gould and jazz greats like Duke Ellington and Lionel Hampton, has 95,000 grave sites.

Only 9,000 have endowments, said Susan Olsen, the executive director of the Friends of Woodlawn. “You’re a conservator,” Ms. Olsen said. “You can’t have someone up there with a bottle of Windex cleaning a Tiffany window.”

The new cemetery tourism — a subterranean version of the History Channel — is also a means of developing brand loyalty in the wake of what Joseph Dispenza, president of the historic Forest Lawn in Buffalo, calls a “diminishing customer base.”

Chapel of the Chimes in Oakland, Calif., a columbarium designed by Julia Morgan, architect of San Simeon, recently started “Jazz at the Chimes” concerts to reach culture enthusiasts who might be potential customers.

Some cemeteries are betting on infotainment. At Heritage Day last weekend at the 200-year-old Congressional Cemetery in Washington, a 70-piece marching band serenaded the grave of John Philip Sousa, and dog owners held a parade for dogs dressed as historical cemetery personages, including a Union soldier.

A decade ago, prostitutes and packs of wild dogs populated the city’s oldest burial ground, which has monuments designed by Benjamin Henry Latrobe, designer of the Capitol. Then the preservation association began courting dog owners. Today, the 33-acre cemetery serves as a historical dog park where dogs run in Elysian fields, free to commune with the headstones. Owners pay $125 a year for the privilege, plus $40 a dog — bringing in $80,000 so far. In many ways, it is a throwback to the days of old, when then-rural cemeteries like Green-Wood and Mount Auburn in Cambridge, Mass. (1831), rivaled Niagara Falls as romantic tourist destinations. These “gardens of graves” were settings for Sunday picnics and a precursor to Central Park and other great public spaces.

Like many vintage cemeteries, Laurel Hill languished for years in a struggling urban neighborhood, as potential customers drifted to the suburbs. Though the cemetery has a $17 million endowment, most of that is earmarked for specific family tombs and falls woefully short of what is needed for maintenance. “After 170 years, people lose track” of their loved ones, said Ross L. Mitchell, the executive director.

And with only 1 percent of its 78 acres available for new burial, cemetery officials are trying to think of creative ways to mine its distinctive personality. The Titanic tour was the brainchild of J. Joseph Edgette, a professor at nearby Widener University who is tracking the graves of Titanic victims and plans to document all 2,200. “We’re rebranding ourselves as a heritage tourism destination,” Mr. Mitchell said.

For Jason Crabtree, a 33-year-old software writer, and his wife, Melissa, 29, this storied rural resting place, established in 1836, offered “a cross-section of humanity you don’t usually see,” said Mr. Crabtree, explaining the couple’s predilection for weekend cemetery visits.

At a daffodil brunch in April at the Oakwood Cemetery in Troy, N.Y., omelet chefs whisked eggs amid Siena marble walls and soaring Tiffany windows, in the Gardner Earl Memorial Chapel and Crematorium. The 1848 cemetery has burial space for the next 200 years and an annual operating deficit of more than $100,000, according to Theresa Page, president of the board of trustees.

Its preservation issues are dire: volunteers have been clearing brush that made about 10,000 graves invisible. The grave site of Samuel Wilson, the man behind “Uncle Sam,” America’s national symbol, has been inaccessible for years, since 125-year-old water pipes burst beneath the roads. The cemetery has asked Congress for $1.7 million for reconstruction.

To raise its profile and money, Oakwood will stage a Renaissance fair this summer, with jousting matches among knights in shining armor. It was inspired by a medieval-style wedding there, for which the groom made his own armor.

“We want them to think, ‘Wow, I think I’d like to spend my eternity here,’ ” Ms. Page said of efforts to lure visitors. “It’s a way of saying, ‘We would love you to stay with us permanently.’ “

Certain cemeteries, like Père-Lachaise in Paris, Arlington National Cemetery in Washington and St. Louis Cemetery No. 1 in New Orleans, have always had celebrity cachet. But the past decade has seen a deliberate marketing of cultural status. At the 175-year-old Mount Auburn, it has meant lectures on the warbler migration by the Massachusetts Audubon Society; at Spring Grove in Cincinnati, tourists in electric trams ride past the grave of Salmon P. Chase, the founder of the Internal Revenue Service (they usually boo).

Forest Lawn in Buffalo spent $1.2 million to erect the Blue Sky mausoleum, a spare design by Frank Lloyd Wright, with 24 crypts from $125,000 to $300,000. Each crypt-owner will receive a Steuben glass sculpture of their eternal home-in-waiting. “It’s about exclusivity,” Mr. Dispenza of Forest Lawn said. “It’s about being one of the 24.”

Gary Laderman, a professor of religion at Emory University and the author of “Rest in Peace: A Cultural History of Death and the Funeral Home in the 20th Century” (Oxford University Press, 2003), says there is “a sense in which, like sex, death sells.” But he also sees cemetery tourism as a chance for civic engagement. The mobility of society and the growth of the death care industry have served to isolate these historically significant places from the mainstream, Mr. Laderman said.

That attitude may be shifting. Laurel Hill, for example, was awarded a $97,000 grant to provide grief counseling for inner-city children grappling with the effects of gun violence.

Of course, some think that cemeteries are sacred spaces, and that Halloween flashlight tours and historical re-enactors jumping out from behind tombs crosses the line in taste.

A 2005 fund-raising calendar for Oakwood Cemetery in Troy — inspired by the movie “Calendar Girls” and featuring socialites who appeared to be naked — was a tad too risqué to repeat, some thought. After objections, Green-Wood scuttled plans to show horror films.

“The cemetery doesn’t have an obligation to entertain,” said Thomas Lynch, a funeral director and writer in Michigan.

Preservationists say desperate times require desperate measures. And “Birding Among the Buried” brings people in, if only for a look.

“The people who built Laurel Hill wanted these monuments to be seen,” said Mr. Mitchell of Laurel Hill. “If we do nothing, isn’t that the ultimate disrespect?”

Posted by M at 19:38:52 | Permalink | No Comments »