Wednesday, May 23, 2007

Egyptian dream takes shape in alien suburbs

Idealized housing rises on the sand, an escape from crowded Cairo.

By Ashraf Khalil, Times Staff Writer; May 22, 2007

The 'burbs in Cairo

CAIRO — It’s sandstorm season in Cairo, one of those humbling days when the desert wind known as the khamsin seems determined to reclaim the city.

A hot, mustard-colored haze engulfs the capital. Residents seal up their windows, and those who venture outside don surgical masks or clutch tissues to their faces against the tide of sand, flying garbage and urban grit.

The same sandstorm blows outside Tarek Atia’s suburban dream home. But here, about 25 miles east of Cairo, the wind, even the light, feels different.


“The air is cleaner, isn’t it?” Atia says, stepping out of the unfinished villa in a gated community called Katameya Residence. “It’s not mixing with the car fumes and other stuff.”

Atia is one of the pioneers of a new suburbia cropping up on the edges of Egypt’s gridlocked and deteriorating capital. Their dream: a little peace, fresh air and a yard to call their own.

With luxury developments sporting names like Golden Heights, Swan Lake and Royal Meadows, Cairo’s new suburbs promise an idealized vision of an appealingly alien lifestyle.

“It has to have a Western feel,” says architect Hisham Bahgat, who helped design several of the developments, including Katameya Residence.

“They’re selling an image of a life.”

They’re also, at times, pushing the boundaries of aesthetics, and provoking a debate over whether these ersatz and elite fringe cities will destroy Cairo’s appeal.

Homes in some of the new communities combine red Mediterranean tile roofs, splashes of pastel colors, Roman columns and sheets of shimmering glass, like grafts taken from random pages of Architectural Digest.

Future University, one of dozens of new private schools dotting the suburbs, looks like a spaceship meshed with a half-scale model of Rome’s Colosseum.

Bahgat’s architectural firm partner, Ahmed Fahim, describes the aesthetic using an Egyptian colloquialism: “Fish, milk and tamarind.” A huge mess.

After a fitful start, suburban construction is progressing nonstop, as is the debate over whether these new communities will help Cairo or finish it off. Critics argue that the building boom sets the stage for unprecedented social divisions.

“You can live in these areas and be totally detached from Egypt,” said Manar Shorbagy, former director of the American Studies Center at American University in Cairo. “It’s going to work like it did in the U.S. — wealthy suburbs and deprived and abandoned inner cities.”

But even American University, which educates the children of Egypt’s richest and most powerful, is about to move to the suburbs.

Egypt has always been a place of rigid class divisions, but until now the wealthy often lived in or near the same neighborhoods where they grew up, sometimes turning modest apartments of their youth into lavish palaces.

“We have never seen this kind of division,” Shorbagy said.

“It’s the Americanization of Egypt.”

Dozens of suburban housing developments east and southwest of the city are up and running; the complex where Atia lives is a boomtown.

But most look like Lakeview: one section lushly landscaped and most of the rest a cluster of unfinished villas and acres of raw desert, surrounded by an ornate wall. Visitors to Lakeview step through gates flanked by artificial waterfalls into a mini-utopia, complete with man-made lake, walking trails, romantic waterside gazebo and Roman-style amphitheater.

The first tenants, according to the sales staff, should be moving in later this year. The first three phases sold out, and homes in Phase 4 start at $740,000.

Cairo’s shift toward suburbia has been in the works for decades.

Former President Anwar Sadat launched a plan in the 1970s to create autonomous satellite cities and draw people away from crowded Cairo.

Many of the developments never became more than factory towns. The only one regarded as a success is October 6 City, about 25 miles southwest of the capital and home to more than 200,000 people.

The government changed strategy in the mid-’90s, turning over suburban development to the private sector and selling vast tracts of state-owned land to investors at sweetheart rates.

“The idea was to help empty out Cairo,” Fahim said. “But now the picture’s been turned upside down.”

Luxury communities with names like Beverly Hills and Greenland popped up around October 6 City, but that boom stalled in the late 1990s, a victim of economic stagnation and the reluctance of naturally tightknit Egyptians to forsake family bonds in the city.

In 2003 a new construction push started, this time centered on a patch of desert known as New Cairo, east of the capital.

“The first people went and proved it could be done, and then people started imitating and it reached a tipping point,” Atia said.

The Atias (Tarek, wife Inas and sons Omar, 8, and Ali, 6) moved to New Cairo in 2003, in part to help Ali’s chronic asthma. Home for the last four years has been a rented two-story home in a complex called Rehab.

“We joked that we were going into rehab from all the pollution and problems of Cairo,” said Atia, a former journalist now working as a media development specialist.

“We didn’t mind the extra drive in exchange for the peace of mind,” said Atia, who still marvels that his home is surrounded by “an actual white picket fence!”

Rehab has gone from ghost town to self-contained suburb, with restaurants, shops, a pool, six mosques and a church, plus housing that ranges from apartment blocks to villas.

As one of the original residents, Atia has watched as newcomers have occasionally struggled to adjust to suburban life. At one point, several neighbors complained about a resident who was raising chickens and goats.

This year, Atia decided to invest. He bought a 3,000-square-foot home in nearby Katameya Residence for about $176,000, from a real estate speculator who paid about $70,000.

“People who bought early have made a killing,” he said. “I should have taken the plunge four years ago.”

Atia sees a bright future for the suburbs: acres of office parks, shopping, culture and a commuter railroad to Cairo. His goal is to help create community newsletters and local radio stations. Having been raised in the suburbs of Washington, D.C., he sees parallels all around.

“I think New Cairo is going to look like Tysons Corner and the area around it,” Atia said. “Over there is going to be McLean, with all the high-end villas.”

Atia has no fear that suburban development may hurt the fortunes of Cairo.

“Cairo would survive if half the people left. It would be better,” he said.

Others aren’t so sure.

Older suburbs like October 6 City, which was state-planned, resulted in a settlement of mixed incomes. But New Cairo is an almost exclusively private-sector creation.

“If it was your money, would you build housing for the poor?” asked Bahgat, the architect. “You’re going to build a compound full of villas.”

While experts debate the sociological implications of Cairo’s exodus, there’s little doubting the idyllic appeal of life outside the city.

After dinner at home in Rehab, with his kids hustled off to bed, Atia led a visitor outside.

The day’s sandstorm had subsided, a haze lingering only around the ornate streetlights. There were no traffic sounds, no crowds and no exhaust fumes, just the unmistakable smell of freshly cut grass.


ashraf.khalil@latimes.com

*

(INFOBOX BELOW)

What you get for the price

A comparison of models in a suburban Cairo home development called Lakeview, above, and those in a development called Bougainvillea at Portola Springs in Irvine:

  Cairo Irvine
Starting price $740,000 $711,990
Min. square feet 6,754 1,670
No. of models 4 3
Bedrooms 4-5 2-4
Bathrooms 5-6 2.5-3.5
Extras Nanny room,staff/driver room Gourmet kitchen, optional loft
Community features 5-star hotel, health spa, clubhouse Parks, retail, tennis, community center

Sources: KB Home, United Company for Touristic & Real Estate Development (Cairo)

Posted by M at 05:22:30 | Permalink | No Comments »

Executive on a Mission: Saving the Planet

Jessica McGowan for The New York Times
Gone Green Ray Anderson at his plant in West Point, Ga.
By CORNELIA DEAN; Published: May 22, 2007

VININGS, Ga. — What Ray Anderson calls his “conversion experience” occurred in the summer of 1994, when he was asked to give the sales force at Interface, the carpet tile company he founded, some talking points about the company’s approach to the environment.

Jessica McGowan for The New York Times
At a plant in LaGrange, carpet scraps are collected for reuse.

“That’s simple,” Mr. Anderson recalls thinking. “We comply with the law.”

 

But as a sales tool, “compliance” lacked inspirational verve. So he started reading about environmental issues, and thinking about them, until pretty soon it hit him: “I was running a company that was plundering the earth,” he realized. “I thought, ‘Damn, some day people like me will be put in jail!’ “

“It was a spear in the chest.”

So instead of environmental regulation, he devoted his speech to his newfound vision of polluted air, overflowing landfills, depleted aquifers and used-up resources. Only one institution was powerful enough and pervasive enough to turn these problems around, he told his colleagues, and it was the institution that was causing them in the first place: “Business. Industry. People like us. Us!”

He challenged his colleagues to set a deadline for Interface to become a “restorative enterprise,” a sustainable operation that takes nothing out of the earth that cannot be recycled or quickly regenerated, and that does no harm to the biosphere.

The deadline they ultimately set is 2020, and the idea has taken hold throughout the company. In a recent interview in his office here overlooking downtown Atlanta, Mr. Anderson said that through waste reduction, recycling, energy efficiency and other steps, Interface was “about 45 percent from where we were to where we want to be.”

Use of fossil fuels is down 45 percent (and net greenhouse gas production, by weight, is down 60 percent), he said, while sales are up 49 percent. Globally, the company’s carpet-making uses one-third the water it used to. The company’s worldwide contribution to landfills has been cut by 80 percent.

“He bet his entire company,” said Bob Fox, an architect who specializes in “green” buildings and who, like Mr. Anderson, is a member of the advisory board of the Harvard Center for Health and the Global Environment. “It worked out probably better even than he hoped. He has set the mark for every other corporation in this country.”

And in the process, Mr. Anderson has turned into perhaps the leading corporate evangelist for sustainability. He had a head start, he acknowledges, because he ran his company and controlled its voting stock. But he can make the case effectively, he said, because his Interface experience teaches that sustainability “doesn’t cost, it pays” — in customer loyalty, employee spirit and hard cash. He says Interface sustainability efforts have saved the company more than $336 million since 1995.

In fact, sustainability has been such a successful strategy that Interface established a consulting arm last year, to market its methods to other companies.

As befits an evangelist, Mr. Anderson, a trim 72-year-old, has taken his message on the road, preaching the sermon of sustainability in at least 115 speeches around the world last year alone.

Since last year, when he turned operating responsibilities over to Dan Hendrix, his successor as chief executive, selling sustainability has been “pretty much my full-time job,” Mr. Anderson said, and several people on the company payroll work more or less full time on it too, handling his schedule and fielding inquiries. “I think he was a typical corporate executive: the bottom line was everything,” said Eric Chivian, director of the Harvard Center. “He really did not think about the impact of his work.”

But today, Dr. Chivian said, Mr. Anderson is “a model of creative thinking about sustainable business practices.”

When Mr. Anderson began his crusade, there were those who thought it was quixotic, and some in the company worried that he was a bit too intense about it. Others thought carpet tiles — squares of nylon pile glued ubiquitously underfoot in offices, classrooms, hospitals, airports and elsewhere — were an unlikely focus for an effort to change the way business does business.

“Well, he won us all over,” said Jo Ann Bachman, one of Mr. Anderson’s assistants.

And for him, carpet tiles were an inspired choice.

For one thing, he is a carpet tile enthusiast. After a short stint at Procter & Gamble, Mr. Anderson, a Georgia native and 1956 graduate of Georgia Tech, was working in the carpet division of Callaway Mills when he discovered carpet tiles on a trip to England that he also describes in his book “Mid-Course Correction” (Chelsea Green, 1998).

It was the early 1970s, he said, and “the office of the future was just then emerging,” with more and more electronic equipment fed by more and more wires running under the floors, as walls gave way to cubicles. Carpet tile allowed businesses to move equipment at will, and the tiles could be replaced individually as they wore out. “It just made so much sense,” he said.

So he put together the necessary financing and started Interface in 1973. Today, the company says it has about $1.1 billion in annual sales and 38 percent of the global market for carpet tiles.

But when it comes to the environment, he eventually realized, carpet “is a pretty abusive industry.”

Carpet makers use lots of petroleum and petroleum derivatives, both as components of synthetic carpet and to power its production. Dyeing carpet is water- and energy-intensive. And when people are finished with the carpet, “it goes into landfills where it lasts probably 20,000 years,” Mr. Anderson said. “Abusive.”

So he challenged his employees to find ways to turn all of that around. And he forestalled objections from his own stockholders, he said, by making the elimination of waste the first target. “We saved money from Day 1,” he said.

He acknowledges that some of the advances the company has made so far are relatively obvious and easy, and that some of its claimed progress relies on steps, like carbon credits, that are far from ideal. For example, the company pays to plant trees that, in theory, take up enough carbon to compensate for the greenhouse gas generated by airplane flights on company business.

“All you are really doing is inventorying the carbon for 200 years,” Mr. Anderson said of the company’s tree-planting efforts, which it subcontracts to a company in the carbon credit business. “It’s better than nothing, but it’s temporary.”

In the future, he said, progress will come “in a lot of little steps and a few very big ones.”

Developing recyclable nylon — “that’s a big step,” he said. (Whoever does it will get all his company’s business, he has said.) Substituting “carbohydrates” — using corn dextrose instead of petroleum — would be even bigger. Renewable energy at a reasonable price would be another big step. Transportation remains “a huge issue,” in spite of the carbon credits.

Even so, customers responded to the campaign, he said, noting that it was questions from customers that prompted the sales force to ask for his environmental views in the first place. “In the aggregate, our products are not costing any more,” he said, and customers do not seem to resist those that are more expensive. “Our profit margins are up, not down,” he said.

One key to the effort’s success, he said, was its comprehensive, across-the-board approach to the entire company. “If you begin with a company and say, ‘We are going to green this company by bolting on these green programs,’ you are going to end up with costs up, not down,” Mr. Anderson said. “We stepped back and said, Let’s look at the whole system.’ “

The audiences for his speeches are changing, too, he said. In the beginning, he often found himself preaching to the choir, he said, but in the last five years, his audiences have more often been business groups.

“I always make the business case for sustainability,” he said. “It’s so compelling. Our costs are down, not up. Our products are the best they have ever been. Our people are motivated by a shared higher purpose — esprit de corps to die for. And the goodwill in the marketplace — it’s just been astonishing.”

Mr. Anderson, who has two grown daughters from a first marriage, commutes to his office in a Toyota Prius. He and his second wife, Pat, also have a home on 86 acres in the mountains near Highlands, N.C. It is off the grid, its landscaping designed to minimize environmental disruption.

And after an argument with the landlord, Interface’s office space here is now illuminated with low-energy, long-life light bulbs.

Mr. Anderson is also proud to say that as a member of an advisory council at Georgia Tech, he persuaded the institution to modify its mission statement to proclaim the goal of “working for a sustainable society.”

But there is a lot that even business cannot accomplish on its own, he said.

For example, he said, the tax code is “perverse,” in that it puts heavy taxes on good things, like income and capital, and leaves a lot of bad things, like energy use, relatively unscathed. And economists typically underestimate the true cost of doing business because they exclude “externalities,” like environmental damage from pollution.

If it were up to him, he said, he would reduce income taxes and raise the gasoline tax (with subsidies for the poor). But he conceded that the Clinton administration, which he served as co-chairman of the Council on Sustainable Development, could not get an energy tax through Congress.

“The country wasn’t ready for it,” Mr. Anderson said, adding that when the sustainability council had a cocktail party for members of Congress, only a handful of members showed up, some of them possibly drawn more by drinks than doctrine.

But since then, he said, environmental groups have been spreading the message. He gives them credit for the success of Al Gore’s global warming documentary, “An Inconvenient Truth.”

“Their work created a supersaturated solution,” he said in the language of chemistry. “Gore drops his crystal in it, and the whole thing precipitates.”

The movie was “fabulous,” he added. And would he support Mr. Gore for president? “Oh, in a heartbeat!”

Mr. Anderson’s schedule is only getting more hectic. He is on track to easily surpass last year’s speech-giving pace, he said, “and I don’t have to send an invitation, they just keep finding me.”

But the effort is worth it, he said, not just for the opportunities he has to spread his message, but for its business-building effect. His favorite audiences are “rich in potential customers,” he said, and among them the sustainability effort “has done more to lift the company’s image than all the advertising we have ever done.”

All of which makes him smile when he looks back on that sales meeting of 1994.

After the speech, he said, “I heard the whispers, ‘Has he gone round the bend?’ ” Mr. Anderson recalls proudly how he confessed at once that he had. “That’s my job,” he said. “To see what’s around the bend.”

Posted by M at 05:20:56 | Permalink | No Comments »