Thursday, March 1, 2007

Purple Line, Two Other Transit Projects Delayed

Study That Underestimated Ridership Could Cost Md. Federal Funds, Officials Say

By Ovetta Wiggins; Washington Post Staff Writer; Thursday, March 1, 2007; Page B01

Maryland officials said yesterday that three major transit projects, two of them aimed at using light rail or express buses to ease traffic in the Washington suburbs, will likely be delayed about a year because of a flawed study that underestimated the number of riders.

State Transportation Secretary John D. Porcari said Metro’s proposed Purple Line between Bethesda and New Carrollton, a transit link between Shady Grove and Clarksburg and the Red Line in Baltimore have been shelved while Maryland and its consultants work on new projections.

Porcari said that the state had planned to hold public hearings on draft environmental studies of the projects this spring but that they will likely be pushed to 2008. “Ridership numbers were wrong, and people were reluctant to face up to that,” Porcari said. “I am not at all happy about this.”

No money has yet been designated to build any of the projects. With $30 million allocated to study the Purple Line and $10 million for the Shady Grove project, known as the Corridor Cities Transitway, officials had hoped to start construction in 2010 or 2011.

Porcari, who became transportation secretary in January, said Maryland Transit Administration staff members have “known since last June that they were running behind schedule.”

He said he only recently became aware of the projections in the study, which could affect the amount of federal money the projects received.

Simon Taylor, director of planning for the Maryland Transit Administration, said the state is trying to leverage as much as it can from the federal government.

“It’s not about wrong information; it’s ensuring that we have the best information,” said Taylor, who also served under then-Gov. Robert L. Ehrlich Jr. (R). “We know that we can make this a better model and a more competitive model.”

Taylor said other metropolitan areas, including Charlotte and Las Vegas, are refining the data for their transit projects. Activists said they were not surprised to hear about the delay.

“The process was already slowing down; the Ehrlich administration was dragging its feet,” said Hans Riemer, president of Montgomery County’s Action Committee for Transit.

Del. William A. Bronrott (D-Montgomery) said that it was disheartening to know the two local projects are being delayed but that he’s hopeful the additional time will work to their advantage.

“If it means we will get more accurate figures on these two important projects, which may help us to leverage more federal transit dollars, than maybe it’s something we can live with,” Bronrott said.

The Purple Line, a light rail or express bus line, would run 14 miles between Bethesda and New Carrollton, with stops in Silver Spring and College Park. The Corridor Cities Transitway would add light rail or rapid bus services along Interstate 270 between the Shady Grove Metro station and just south of Clarksburg.

“While I’m disappointed, I want them to get it right,” said Montgomery County Council President Marilyn Praisner (D-Eastern County). “We want to compete [for the federal dollars]. . . . We’ve got to make sure that when we go forward . . . there are no glitches.”

Posted by M at 19:14:46 | Permalink | No Comments »

L.A. hopes past will be prologue

City says Olympic experience offers edge over Chicago

By Philip Hersh, Tribune Olympics reporter
Published March 1, 2007, 11:29 PM CST

LOS ANGELES — The committee trying to bring the 2016 Olympic Games to Los Angeles gave the U.S. Olympic Committee commission evaluating their chances a virtual tour of the proposed Olympic Village on the UCLA campus Thursday.

Sophisticated urban simulation software developed by UCLA professor Bill Jepson made the tour possible and reflected one of Los Angeles’ major talking points for its bid: That the creative community centered in Hollywood will be available for the first time to promote the Olympics.

But the virtual part wasn’t necessary because the USOC visitors later walked through the real buildings that would house about 75 percent of the 16,000 athletes and officials on the campus if the Games were in Los Angeles for a third time. UCLA is building new housing that would accommodate the rest.

While Chicago’s 2016 Olympic bid extols the attractiveness of a $1.1 billion development on Lake Shore Drive that would make its debut as an Olympic Village and provide the comforts of apartment-style living, that housing exists only on drawing boards.

And although Chicago’s village would be much closer to most of the sports venues than the UCLA dorms are to the Los Angeles venues, the USOC will leave Southern California with the comfort of having seen actual bricks and mortar as it decides April 14 which city would be the better candidate for the 2016 bid.

“This city is ready and willing to host these Olympics,” Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa said in a public greeting to the 18-member USOC group, decked out in black jackets with “United States Olympic Committee 2016 evaluation commission” embroidered on the chest.

The same group will be in Chicago on Monday through Wednesday. The USOC will not comment about the L.A. evaluation until Friday, after it has been feted at the Getty Museum on Thursday night.

Banners reading “LA 2016″ hung along the stretch of Sunset Boulevard adjacent to the UCLA campus. A Disney-produced film, “Why LA?,” had its premiere for USOC and media audiences. Frequent expressions of Los Angeles as the chosen place, hubris be darned, hung in the sunny atmosphere of a perfect late-winter day.

“We have the beaches, the palm trees, the glitz and the glamor,” Villaraigosa said as he introduced the 31/2-minute film emphasizing all those things, including Los Angeles being home to more Olympians than any other city in the world.

“This is where stars are born and where dreams are made. No city inspires dreams quite like the city of Los Angeles,” he said.

Reality sometimes is less inspiring.

Nearly one-fifth of the residents in a UCLA Olympic Village would have to use a common shower and bathroom down the hall. Many others would have one bathroom and shower for five or six people.

Chicago hopes its apartment-style village will look better by comparison, even if it is only on paper.

“When we said ‘college-type room’ 20 years ago or 30 years ago, we had rooms and toilets and a common shower at the end of a hall. Of course, that we don’t want,” Gilbert Felli, the International Olympic Committee’s executive director for the Olympic Games, said in a Tribune interview.

“If you have as we do now on [many] campuses, rooms where you have your own shower, sometimes even a little kitchen, everybody will say it is fantastic.”

The UCLA village, undergraduate housing on the northwest side of campus, has the feel of a community with eight dining halls and recreation facilities such as pools and tennis courts. It is next to the track and sports medicine centers.

The Chicago village would have similar facilities—plus an exclusive lakefront beach—because the IOC requires them, according to Chicago 2016 spokesman Mike Kontos.

Because only one Olympic venue is planned at UCLA—Pauley Pavilion, for volleyball preliminaries—travel times to other venues are an issue in a city where overtaxed freeways are constantly congested.

Olympic gold medal swimmer Janet Evans needed 2½ hours Thursday to cover the 66 miles from her home in Orange County to UCLA, where she introduced the civic and campus leaders who presented the L.A. bid to the USOC commission. It took a reporter 45 minutes from her home in Long Beach, where 16 sports would be played.

A day before the USOC tours the venues, Villaraigosa played down travel concerns, citing new rail service and traffic management as solutions.

“In 1984 (the last L.A. Olympics), people talked about doomsday and Armageddon, yet traffic flowed because leadership decisions were made,” he said.

phersh@tribune.com

Posted by M at 17:12:39 | Permalink | No Comments »

Let the games for the Games begin

Starting this week, L.A. and Chicago pull out all the stops to sell themselves

By Michael Martinez, Tribune national correspondent
Published March 1, 2007

LOS ANGELES — The battle between Chicago and Los Angeles for the 2016 Olympics is now fully raging as the U.S. Olympic Committee begins a final inspection visit to the City of Angels this week–and then tours the Windy City next week.

Los Angeles will make its last pitch to an evaluation team on Thursday and Friday, and it must convince the committee that after hosting the Olympics in 1932 and 1984, it should represent the United States for a third time, while Chicago is eager and willing for a first chance.

This is a pivotal week in the selection process, and the inspections will highlight the strengths and weaknesses of two great American cities.

For example, Los Angeles will promote its experience and existing facilities, but it will also have to address its shortcomings in traffic, sprawl, an aging Coliseum as the Olympic marquee, and a potential been-there-done-that fatigue at the international level, analysts said.

The committee will choose between the two on April 14, with the winner advancing as the U.S. candidate to the international competition for the 2016 Summer Games.

“Chicago is extremely formidable, but L.A. is extremely strong,” said David Carter, executive director of the University of Southern California’s Sports Business Institute. “But Chicago, with its sports will and political will, is a ready-for-prime-time challenger.”

Mark Dolley, the spokesman for San Francisco’s Olympic bid until that city dropped out last year, said Los Angeles needs “to demonstrate how they could make a third Olympic Games a little bit different and a little special, bearing in mind that it’s been only 23 years since the last one.”

David Simon, president of the Southern California Committee for the Olympic Games, responded: “Some say that the fact we’ve had the Olympics twice is our challenge. We happen to think that is one of our chief strengths.”

Analysts also noted that another Los Angeles Olympics would have to compete with the city’s long slate of entertainment events.

In sizing up the final two cities, analysts spoke of Chicago’s civic engagement, promoted in part by its centralized politics and its powerful mayor, Richard Daley, who has also made more high-profile visits to Olympic sites overseas than Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa.

In proposing an all-important stadium for opening and closing ceremonies, both cities have advanced temporary structures or improvements. Los Angeles would spend $112 million on temporary additions, largely endorsed by preservationists, to the historic Coliseum, which opened in 1923. Chicago has proposed a $366 million facility in the South Side’s Washington Park, which would later be converted into a 5,000-seat amphitheater.

In the crucial visits, a 12-member USOC evaluation commission, joined by five support staff members, will analyze each city’s bid in a process that’s part kicking the tires on the proposals and part ensuring either city is qualified to be the U.S. nominee, analysts said.

Both cities will be largely confined to addressing certain themes such as transportation, security, media operations and a financial plan.

Ultimately, the USOC officials will be evaluating which city can win the international race for the 2016 Summer Games, competing against world capitals such as Rome, Tokyo, Madrid and New Delhi, analysts said.

“We’re looking for the city that has the best chance to be competitive in what we know will be a very challenging international race,” said Darryl Seibel, spokesman for the U.S. Olympic Committee.

The Olympic evaluation team is scheduled to spend Thursday hearing from Southern California officials and viewing the debut of a short film by Disney, “Why L.A.?”

The evaluators will tour the UCLA campus, the proposed site for the Olympic village and some event venues. On Friday, they will visit the Home Depot Center in Carson, venues in Long Beach and then the Staples Center downtown.

“It’s part dog-and-pony show too,” said Toronto sports consultant Rob Livingstone, who assisted Toronto’s bid for the 2008 Games that ultimately went to Beijing. “In a way that’s kind of important. If they can’t put on a good show on the domestic level, they can’t do it on an international level.”

Right now, Los Angeles seems to be ahead of Chicago in the competition, according to two Chicago-based observers.

“My handicapping of it is very close to even. L.A. is still in the lead but that lead has shrunk significantly over the last few months,” said Marc Ganis, president of Sportscorp Ltd., a consulting firm with no ties to the Olympics.

He noted that the Olympic community eyes Chicago with “curiosity” and “intrigue.”

Ganis favors Chicago for the 2016 Games, but not Allen Sanderson, a University of Chicago economist who was born in Southern California and has lived in Chicago for 22 years.

“I hope L.A. gets it. These things tend to be very expensive parties and Los Angeles would be the least expensive drain,” Sanderson said. “Chicago will be very expensive if they get it.”

Those costs will be negotiated by the winning city with the USOC.

“Just know that the evaluation–I can tell you because I know these guys pretty well–is `What’s in it for the U.S. Olympic Committee?’ and `What are the financial splits?’” said A.D. Frazier, chief operating officer for the 1996 Atlanta Games. “It will be a negotiation between Chicago and Los Angeles as to who’s more willing to meet my demands. Absolutely. You can take that to the bank.”

———-

mjmartinez@tribune.com

Posted by M at 17:08:16 | Permalink | No Comments »

Mega-cities, mega-problems

Billions in the developing world are shifting from rural to urban areas, bringing poverty to dangerous new levels.
By Nicolas P. Retsinas,
NICOLAS P. RETSINAS is the director of the Joint Center for Housing Studies at Harvard University and chairman of the board of directors for Habitat for Humanity International.
February 28, 2007

THE WORLD HAS reached a point of hyper-urbanization: 2007 marks the first year when more than half the global population is “urban,” not “rural.” Indeed, this is the era of the “mega-city” — metropolises of 10 million-plus. In 1950, only Tokyo and New York met that threshold. Today there are 20 mega-cities, including Mexico City, Karachi, Manila, Dhaka, Lagos, Jakarta and Chongqing.


This type of drastic population shift isn’t without precedent. During the Industrial Revolution, concentrations of people in U.S. and European cities were part and parcel of a factory economy. But that economic and technological progress came with a price — decades of fetid slums, horrific child mortality, raging epidemic disease. This time around, with cities 10 times bigger and demand for workers uncertain, the costs could be exponentially larger.

In general, an optimist might cheer urbanization as a sign of modernization; Residents of developed countries are much more likely to live in cities than their counterparts in still-developing nations (74% vs. 43%). The city, after all, is the hub of culture, a magnet that draws artists, writers, musicians — the place where creative spirits create. Great cities have ballet troupes, opera companies, orchestras. The city is, likewise, the hub of industry, generating the bulk of most countries’ gross domestic product. Most important, the city is the hub of ideas. The mingling of people spurs the intellectual innovation that fuels thriving societies, at least in the developed world.

But urbanization historically also has spawned an impoverished underclass of the marginally employed, or unemployed, living in a cruel despair. Think of Charles Dickens’ London: Scrooge wanted to diminish the “surplus population.” Or remember Karl Marx’s ruminations on the “lumpen proletariat,” doomed to subsistence.

Cholera, typhoid, influenza — all cut a swath through 19th and early 20th century urban populations. Yet in time those horrors abated as infrastructure — clean water, enclosed sewers, labor laws, public education, medical advances — was created. In time, the 19th century cities morphed into exciting places. Today, Dickens or Marx could contentedly sip cappuccino in Florence, take in the opera at London’s Covent Garden or peruse the museums of Paris.

Cities in the United States and Europe still have dense clusters of the poor, to be sure. They live in cramped housing with few amenities, but they no longer starve or die from cholera. Immigrants, in particular, who crowd — legally and not — into these developed cities believe that however desperate their straits, their children will fare better.

The newly ascendant mega-cities in the developing world, though, can dishearten even the most persistent optimist. They are relentless agglomerations of people, drawn not so much by the promise of prosperity as by the hope of survival.

It is internal migrant populations that are pouring into most of these exploding urban areas. In China, for instance, 150 million people have left their rural homes in the last 10 years, leaving a dearth of workers in the agricultural sector. Political and war refugees, too, flow in steadily. A fortunate few may realize a steady income, maybe even own property, but most live in slums whose filthy water, political chaos and nonexistent municipal infrastructure would startle Dickens and Marx.

The United Nations estimates that, today, 2.8 billion people live on less than $2 a day. And it is this huge, desperate underclass that is filling these mega-cities. Children are more likely to roam in gangs than attend school. Cholera and typhoid — diseases listed as “rare” in Western textbooks — are endemic. Often there is no geographic core, just as there is no governmental core to oversee the chaos. Parts of these cities are modern, with the familiar skyscrapers, highways and BlackBerry-toting workers. Yet they are surrounded by rings of shocking poverty where millions live in paper-covered hovels.

Without some concerted action from nations and international institutions, these mega-cities will grow larger and more desperate. Philanthropy helps, but these developing countries need public policies that promote property ownership, increase access to credit and enhance government transparency.

There is no quick panacea to improving the lot of billions of people; it took more than 50 years to address the slums of the 19th century. But there is an urgency to today’s task. The slum dwellers of Lagos and Manila and Karachi are part of the global economy, bound to the rest of the world. Their misery will spill beyond their borders, and if that happens, our urban age risks becoming a global nightmare.

Posted by M at 05:13:57 | Permalink | No Comments »

Telegraph Hill landslide forces 120 from homes

‘I thought it was an earthquake. … There were rocks everywhere’

Wednesday, February 28, 2007

Area Where Slide Occurred. Chronicle graphic by Gus D'Angelo North Beach Rock Slide Zone. Chronicle graphic by Joe Sho... Workers inspect the damage inflicted by a rockslide near ... 455 Vallejo St. A 45-unit condominium complex sits ...

The hundreds of tons of rock that broke loose Tuesday from a slope in San Francisco’s North Beach will take weeks to clean up, and it probably will be months before the hillside is made safe and the 120 residents driven from their homes can return, city officials said.

 

Seven buildings were rendered uninhabitable when a 75-foot-wide chunk of Telegraph Hill slid down a granite and sandstone slope above Broadway about 3:30 a.m. Among the buildings that city officials declared off-limits was a 45-unit condominium complex at 455 Vallejo St. perched at the edge of the newly formed cliff.

City officials speculated that recent heavy rains had triggered the slide, which did not cause any injuries.

A concrete patio connected to the condo building was in danger of falling Tuesday evening, along with several large rocks nearby, said officials with the city Department of Building Inspection. The building’s structural integrity was unknown, and residents were not allowed to return.

Also red-tagged and declared uninhabitable were three apartment buildings on Montgomery Street on the slide’s east side and three buildings on Broadway, including the Broadway Showgirls Cabaret strip club.

The nightclub’s manager, Ian Cabungcal, said the slide had demolished his office. “If I’d been there at the time, I’d have been dead,” he said. “There is a rock the size of a Volkswagen in the middle of my office.”

Building Inspection officials said the slide had occurred on private land and that the owners of the seven affected properties were responsible for removing the 30-foot pile of rocks and stabilizing the hill.

They told the condominium building’s owners that they needed to hire a contractor to remove the concrete and loose rock that engineers considered to be in imminent danger of collapsing. But by late Tuesday, the owners had failed to reach an agreement on how to deal with the problem.

Police, fire and building officials said the situation could take weeks to resolve. A geologist retained by the city to assess the condition of the rock face could have a report by this morning, they said.

“We have to remove a lot of sections (of rock) that are loose and come up with a long-term solution, and that takes a lot of engineers,” said Carla Johnson, deputy director of the Building Inspection Department.

Contractors who viewed the slide Tuesday said they doubted residents would return soon.

Ryan Nagle of Drill Tech in Antioch, which did work for Caltrans to strengthen a rock wall on Devil’s Slide after storms damaged Highway 1 last year, said the hillside that slid Tuesday will probably need structural support to prevent further collapses. To install such support, workers will need to drill 2-inch-thick rebar steel poles into the rock, a job that easily could take crews working around the clock, seven days a week, up to a month to complete, Nagle said.

“The work is a pain … to do here because a crane parked on Broadway or Montgomery Street needs to go over the top of buildings (facing the street) and suspend guys in a basket to do the drilling,” Nagle said.

After inserting the rebar in a grid about every 5 feet along the rock face, workers would pour a concrete-like substance to seal it, he said.

Taking away the pile of rocks at the base of the slide also will require a crane that will have to be parked on Broadway, Montgomery or Vallejo plus dump trucks to haul away the debris, contractors said.

“We’d need to use slings and netting or steel chokes to lift the boulders out, and we’d have to suspend them over the buildings to do it,” said Thomas Hart, a manager with Sheedy Drayage Co.

In addition to the immediate need to remove the unstable concrete slab from the back of the Vallejo Street property and nearby loose rocks, the entire slide area will need to be contained until work can start, said Michael “Mac” McLaughlin, who works for Granite Excavation and Demolition Inc. of San Francisco.

“There’s fissures in those rocks and loose rock suggesting that more could fall,” McLaughlin said. “They’ll probably net it, cover it in plastic, use some sandbags and put a chain-link fence around it.”

While preparations were under way to fix the damage, residents driven from their homes pondered their next moves.

On Broadway, about two dozen displaced people sat inside a Muni bus that was temporarily parked as a shelter in front of their homes. They sipped coffee and ate chocolate doughnuts from a Red Cross wagon. Others spent the day on cots inside a Red Cross shelter set up in a gym on Mason Street.

“I was watching TV when I heard a boom, boom — twice. Two booms,” said Steve Liu, who has lived for 10 years in a flat at 432 Broadway. “At first I thought it was an earthquake. It was scary. There were rocks everywhere. Big rocks. Forty-pound rocks, a foot across.”

Liu said a retaining net was strung along part of the hillside to catch smaller pieces of debris a few years ago.

“They must have put it there for a reason,” he said.

Mark Loftin and his bulldog, Boss, were asleep in their condo at 455 Vallejo when the slide occurred. A police officer banging on their front door was their first notice that something was wrong.

“The officer said, ‘Get your clothes, get your car, and get out,’ ” Loftin said. “There was a lot of commotion but no panic.”

Loftin, who bought his unit two years ago, said he was satisfied at the time by inspectors’ reports that said the hillside was solid.

“When you move into a place on a cliff, you’re aware of the movies and the horror stories about all the worst things that can happen,” he said. “But I was told this was some of the most solid rock in the city.”

Resident manager Anne White, who owns a condo in the Vallejo Street building, said the homeowners association had the hillside shored up about five years ago after some rocks fell. A geologist who surveyed the area recently suggested that the neighbors on Montgomery and Broadway do further work, she said.

The geologist also said, however, that no reinforcement work could be done until after the rainy season, White said.

Owners of other buildings declared off-limits because of the slide said they had no inkling the hill was dangerous.

Peter Chin owns two of the red-tagged buildings, at 426 and 432 Broadway, which between them have 13 apartments and two restaurants. He bought them in August and said the previous owners had told him the hillside was city property.

“I saw on the other side of the rock formation, they had put nets and stuff like that,” Chin said. “And my understanding was that the city was going to do that on my side.”

Chin said he does not believe his insurance will pay for the repairs to his buildings or the cost of shoring up the hill.

Joe Carouba, who purchased Showgirls just two months ago, also isn’t sure whether he’ll have to pay out of his own pocket.

“I sure hope my insurance covers it, but I honestly don’t know,” he said. “We just closed on the place.”

Chronicle staff writer Wyatt Buchanan contributed to this report. E-mail the writers at rselna@sfchronicle.com, srubenstein@sfchronicle.com and mlagos@sfchronicle.com.

This article appeared on page A - 1 of the San Francisco Chronicle

Posted by M at 04:58:36 | Permalink | No Comments »

New federal building in SoMa costs a bundle

Wednesday, February 28, 2007

The 18-story tower and attached four-story annex at Seventh and Mission streets, where federal employees will start moving in this week, were supposed to have been finished in the summer of 2005. But the recycled, ecologically sensitive fly ash that was mixed into the cement — both for a lighter finish and to better reflect sunlight — was painfully slow in curing, as well as expensive.

Officials said the slow-drying concrete set off a domino effect that resulted in a string of construction delays. Now, contractors are lining up to file claims for overruns.

Also boosting the costs were the tons of steel rebar and concrete added to help withstand a bomb blast — a consideration that came front and center after the 1995 bombing of the federal building in Oklahoma City and the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.

Nobody will say exactly how much the overruns may total, but contractors involved in the project said privately a few months ago that construction was at least 50 percent over budget.

Officially, the project price tag remains at $144 million — a figure that most bureaucrats are sticking to, because federal projects technically aren’t allowed to run over budget.

But supervising architect Maria Ciprazo conceded that the $144 million doesn’t include $21 million or so for designing and engineering, $14 million for contingencies and millions more for furnishings.

“Nobody has given numbers,” said Ciprazo, who was reluctant to discuss the cost overruns while the claims are pending.

As for the question of what to call the new eco wonder:

We already have the Phil Burton Federal Building in San Francisco and a Ron Dellums Federal Building in Oakland.

There’s certainly no shortage of contenders for the new edifice, including the Bay Area’s two homegrown U.S. senators — Dianne Feinstein and Barbara Boxer — and the first woman to be speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi.

Typically, public buildings are named for notables who have passed on — or at least passed from office.

And more often than not, it’s someone who has had an “association with the city, or who helped with funding for the building,” said General Services Administration spokesman Gene Gibson.

Pelosi fits the bill on both scores — in fact, GSA officials say she was instrumental in securing both funding and support for the project’s design.

As far as we can tell, she hasn’t made any moves to have the new building in her district named for herself or anyone else. But should it happen, it will take an act of Congress.

Hey, it’s worth a shot: Voters may give legislators the term-limit extension they so desperately crave, but only if pols keep behaving themselves.

Those are pretty much the findings laid out in a memo by pollster David Binder being circulated up in Sacramento.

Binder was commissioned by groups backing an initiative headed to the February 2008 ballot that would allow state lawmakers up to 12 years in the office of their choice.

The pollster found in his survey of 800 likely voters, conducted over several days in late January, that 59 percent would support extending legislative terms — an increase of 16 percentage points since the same time last year.

The poll also found that 58 percent of respondents said the state was headed in the right direction, the highest such rating since Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger took office in 2003.

Binder attributes the voters’ newfound affection for lawmakers to the fact that the Legislature and governor are getting along for a change.

The new “We Are the World” attitude has also given a boost to Schwarzenegger’s approval rating. Binder found 68 percent approve of the job the governor is doing, up 15 points from this time last year.

Drivers beware: Last year, a special squad of the Alameda County Sheriff’s Department handed out 11,586 tickets — at $250 each — for parking in AC Transit bus zones.

The squad is under contract to provide police services for AC Transit, a job that includes making sure cars that stop in bus zones — even for a moment — get zapped with a ticket.

Bus zones at BART stations? Fair game. Another popular ticketing spot is along Broadway in downtown Oakland.

Sheriff’s Department spokesman Sgt. J.D. Nelson said that the squad doesn’t target BART stations or other areas per se, and that the deputies hand out tickets only as part of their regular patrols.

But considering that they’re issuing bus zone tickets at a rate of 31 a day, they certainly seem to have a knack for being in the right place at the right time … a whole lot of the time.

Just thought we’d warn you.

Chronicle columnists Phillip Matier and Andrew Ross appear Sundays, Mondays and Wednesdays. Phil can be seen on CBS 5-TV’s morning and evening news. Matier can also be heard on KCBS radio Monday to Friday at 7:50 a.m. and 5:50 p.m. Got a tip? Call (415) 777-8815, or e-mail matierandross@sfchronicle.com.

This article appeared on page B - 1 of the San Francisco Chronicle

Posted by M at 04:57:07 | Permalink | No Comments »

San Bernardino County OKs desert sewage sludge composting plant

Residents of Hinkley, near the proposed facility, protest the decision in vain.
By Sara Lin, Times Staff Writer
February 28, 2007

 

Map

The San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors on Tuesday voted unanimously in favor of a proposed sewage sludge composting plant that would be built eight miles outside the high desert town of Hinkley, despite strong objections from residents worried about potential health hazards.


“I think this will end up being the best project possible under the circumstances,” said Board Chairman Paul Biane.

The town was made famous by activist Erin Brockovich, who helped force Pacific Gas & Electric Co. to pay a multimillion-dollar settlement for allegedly polluting the town’s groundwater and causing serious health problems for residents. That successful effort was later made into the movie “Erin Brockovich,” starring Julia Roberts.

Supervisor Brad Mitzelfelt, whose district includes Hinkley, said he wasn’t convinced that composting sludge would harm the community.

“The project, as I see it, is a cost-effective and environmentally efficient way to recycle biosolids and green waste. It’s a benefit to the county; it will save landfill space,” he said.

The supervisors voted 4 to 0 in favor of the project. Supervisor Gary Ovitt was absent and the only supervisor not to vote.

Apple Valley-based Nursery Products LLC plans to compost sludge — the cake-like material left over after raw sewage is treated at a sanitation plant — on 80 acres of Mojave Desert outside Hinkley.

Residents of Hinkley and nearby Barstow — communities that are downwind of the proposed facility — fear that strong desert winds will blow odors and bacteria-laden dust into the air, making people sick. Under the current plan, San Bernardino and Riverside counties could unload 400,000 tons of sludge per year at the facility.

About 120 people — middle school children wearing anti-sludge T-shirts, elected officials from Barstow, and Hinkley residents wearing cowboy hats — made the two-hour trip south to attend Tuesday’s often-tense meeting.

“You tell me that if your kids and your family lived downwind of this thing that you wouldn’t be standing where I’m standing,” said Hinkley resident Norman Diaz, his voice cracking as he spoke against the project.

His 7-year-old twin sons stood on either side of him as he addressed the board.

“It’s just too dangerous; it’s just not worth the risks. This is a bad project that needs to be stopped.”

A lawyer for Nursery Products, David Hagopian, at times heckled by the audience, assured the board that composting did not pose a health threat to desert residents.

The proposed facility fulfills an important need for sludge composting plants in Southern California, he said, and would produce agricultural-grade compost to be used on local farms.

“Biosolids are not raw sewage,” he said. “The bottom line is that composting biosolids is safe. We’re far away from people, and communities and from industry.”

Brockovich was in Australia and unable to attend the meeting, said Diaz, who is leading the charge against Nursery Products.

A Brockovich aide read her statement to the board: “Citizens in this area already have compromised immune systems. They moved to a town with open land and open air hoping to have a safe place for their children to visit. Please put yourself in their shoes.”

In a public hearing that lasted more than four hours, residents opposed to the project pointed to the company’s history with the city of Adelanto, where city officials sued in 2005 to close a similar facility there after residents complained of odors and flies.

The Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, which had a switching station 200 yards from the Adelanto facility, also filed suit after workers’ eyes itched and their noses ran because of dust and odors, said DWP attorney S. David Hotchkiss.

Nursery Products representatives said the odor and fly problems evaporated after they stopped accepting curbside green waste.

They decided to move to a new site rather than face a protracted legal battle, company representatives said.

After Adelanto, the company tried to relocate to nearby Newberry Springs, where residents made such a fuss that the company withdrew its proposal.

Alan Rubin, a former senior scientist for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, said residents’ fears about getting sick from being downwind were unfounded.

“This is site is eight miles from the nearest community. There is zero evidence that this biosolids recycling facility will have any negative impact on public health,” he said.

Hinkley residents still suffering from cancer and other serious illnesses they blame on a leaky PG&E gas facility, say they aren’t willing to take the risk.

“People listened to PG&E, and they said everything was OK. But it wasn’t; we listened, and it cost a lot of lives,” said Floyd Burns, 72. He drives his wife, Jean, to Victorville for chemotherapy five days a week.

Jean Burns, 67, survived breast cancer but now suffers from lymphoma that she believes was caused by chromium poisoning. She was part of a second lawsuit against PG&E.

Residents say they wouldn’t mind Nursery Product’s composting plant so much if the company would enclose it and filter odors. Nursery Products officials have said that option is too expensive.

Diaz said that Hinkley residents, crushed by the board’s decision, cannot afford to file a lawsuit to block the project.

“We’ve spent all our money,” he said.

*


sara.lin@latimes.com
Posted by M at 04:00:43 | Permalink | Comments (1) »

Making Your Second Home Green

Illustration by Nancy Doniger
By AMY GUNDERSON
Published: February 28, 2007

When James Seligman and his wife, Kathleen, were building a second home in Three Rivers, Calif., last year, they decided there was only one way to go: green. Their two-bedroom house has double-paned windows, nontoxic cotton insulation, energy-efficient appliances and clay-based wall coverings.

 

“We didn’t use any paint,” said Mr. Seligman, 52, a documentary filmmaker whose primary home is also in Three Rivers. He plans to use the new house and also market it as a vacation rental to visitors who prize the area for its kayaking and hiking in nearby Sequoia National Park.

Kaweah Cottage, as the house is known, was designed to accommodate solar panels. Sustainably harvested wood was used for most of it. The building debris was recycled. And the house is relatively small — 969 square feet. “People want to build green and they end up with a 4,000-square-foot glass house that I think has very little to do with green building,” Mr. Seligman said. “To me it has to do with the scale. Small is beautiful.”

In home construction and remodeling, there is no bigger buzzword than green building. And going green doesn’t have to mean buying a yurt, 10 miles from the nearest neighbor. The topic has been spotlighted at national builders’ trade shows, and about 50 cities have green building programs that can educate homeowners on environmentally friendly and energy-conserving ways of outfitting a house and link them with local experts in making a home green.

Anybody, of course, can call a building green. To impose accountability, the United States Green Building Council — usgbc.org — created a rating system called LEED, for Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design, to measure the degree to which buildings incorporate green practices and materials. The system is in use for larger buildings, and a version for new single-family homes is likely to be rolled out in the summer.

For second-home owners, the prospect of going green can be very appealing, whether they are remodeling a weekend fixer-upper, trying to eliminate drafty windows and high heating bills at a ski chalet, or simply creating an easy-to-maintain house that might one day change from vacation retreat to retirement home.

As green construction goes mainstream, architects and builders are becoming better versed in environmentally friendly construction, and new green products are increasing the choices — thus lowering the prices — for elements like floors and countertops.

But building green still carries a premium. “You are not going to find the price-sensitive shopper in our stores,” said Lisa DiMartino, the vice president for marketing of Environmental Home Center, a green-home retailer with stores in Seattle and in Portland and Bend, Ore. “These are materials that are durable. You are going to pay for that. But the cost in the long run can be less than other products you are going to have to replace. Wool carpets can look great for 20 years. Synthetic carpets will need to be replaced.”

The higher cost varies according to the product. Mr. Seligman wouldn’t discuss the cost of his new home but said the price of going green was double what it would have been for a regular house. “It’s more expensive,” he acknowledged, “but you have to take in the totality of it. Energy is only going to get more expensive.”

Beyond potential durability, green building has its roots in some basic tenets. “To me,” said David Johnston, an expert in the field, “green homes have three fundamental legs: energy efficiency, the conservation of resources and good indoor air quality.” Mr. Johnston’s company, What’s Working, of Boulder, Colo., consults with builders and developers. “We can tighten up homes and reduce an energy bill by 20 percent,” he said.

Lowering energy costs over the long haul is what often drives homeowners to green building, and many people consider installing photovoltaic solar panels, which can generate electricity. But architects say the panels are still an expensive option, to be considered only after other, less expensive, energy upgrades, like insulating hot-water lines or installing new windows.

“You first do the least expensive or no-cost item,” said Maurice Levitch, president of Levitch Associates, an architecture and building firm in Berkeley, Calif. “It might not be the PV solar panels. That could eat up an extra $20,000 in a remodel budget. But plan ahead. You can always do some work inside of the building to get it ready for solar at a later date.”

There are other ways to look at making a home more energy efficient, said Peter Pfeiffer, a principal at Barley & Pfeiffer Architects in Austin, Tex. For instance, a homeowner planning a master-bedroom addition in a one-level house might build a second floor with a separately controlled heating and cooling system rather than expand the one on the first floor. The upstairs bedrooms can be cooled or heated at night and the first floor system can be turned off, Mr. Pfeiffer said, so energy usage can drop by a third.

Green building is also getting attention from those who, either because of health concerns or an interest in environmental stewardship, want to reduce their exposure to potentially harmful chemicals in their homes. Finishes on floors and cabinets as well as paints that are dubbed “no V.O.C.” (for volatile organic compound) or “low V.O.C.” appeal to those homeowners. Such products are now easy to find, Ms. DiMartino said, because “most of the major paint companies are doing a low-toxicity line.”

Bamboo floors are a popular option, but there are many other possibilities for home surfaces. They include: countertops made from 100 percent recycled paper bound with resin; cork floors made from scraps gathered from wine-cork manufacturers; and wood floors certified by the Forest Stewardship Council as having been harvested from a well-managed forest.

Buying from local sources may also be eco-friendly because of the fuel saved in transportation. “We might suggest to a client to use an old antique hardwood pine from a demolished building,” Mr. Pfeiffer said. “It’s a great use of floor, whereas a bamboo floor might have to be shipped in from halfway around the world.”

But even with the best intentions, Mr. Seligman said, it can be difficult to keep to the plan and make everything eco-friendly — there are always other considerations. For one, instead of counters made from bamboo or compressed paper, he went with granite.

“It’s the aesthetics of it,” he said. “Granite is beautiful.”

Posted by M at 03:53:21 | Permalink | No Comments »