Friday, February 23, 2007

In New Orleans, Progress at Last in the Lower Ninth Ward

Cheryl Gerber for The New York Times
Gwendolyn Guice and Josephine Butler, next-door neighbors before Hurricane Katrina, will be again in the Lower Ninth Ward’s first new houses.
By ADAM NOSSITER; Published: February 23, 2007

NEW ORLEANS, Feb. 22 — The first new houses built in the Lower Ninth Ward since Hurricane Katrina were turned over to their owners on Thursday, creating a small island of hope in a sea of ruin.

 

Side by side, sparkling and bright on Delery Street at the neighborhood’s eastern edge, the two houses unveiled at a ceremony on Thursday stand out in a landscape grimly frozen since the storm. The twin pastel variants on traditional New Orleans architecture sit incongruously whole amid block after block of ruined shells with doors swinging open and windows gaping wide.

Empty during the day and dark at night, this area is a long way from being a neighborhood again, even though it has been the focus of intensive volunteer efforts and organizing since the storm. The destruction of the Lower Ninth Ward, which was working-class and black before the hurricane, and its subsequent failure to begin recovering, have become symbols for what some see as inequities in this city’s halting revival.

That symbolism was much in evidence at the ceremony, a gathering of the homeowners and the varied volunteer forces that built the $125,000 solid pine houses, which officials said are elevated five feet and designed to resist hurricane-force winds. It was an occasion to look past the catastrophe that sent a wall of water rushing into the Lower Ninth Ward 18 months ago, at least for the moment. If the levees fail again and a similar volume of water comes through, the new houses will take only two feet of water, the contractor said.

There were promises on Thursday to bring the neighborhood back, particularly from Acorn, the nonprofit neighborhood group that organized the construction and helped finance the two houses. There was cheering, there were plaques for the volunteers, and there were speeches by politicians and preachers.

And there were the two sturdy women who had been next-door neighbors for 25 years until Hurricane Katrina blew their houses away, the owners Gwendolyn Guice and Josephine Butler, who received the keys to the new houses on Thursday.

Acorn and the volunteers built the houses on the same spot as the women’s original ones, and both women seemed overcome at being back.

“I’m all over hoops,” Ms. Guice said, switching between tears and smiles as she happily showed off her trim little green house, a subtle modification of the classic New Orleans front-to-back-hall style.

Looking out the back at a nearby school building with a collapsed roof and a muddy vacant lot where there was once a house, Ms. Guice was adamant that Thursday represented a hopeful beginning on a street that once sheltered many solid homeowners.

“A lot of people are just sitting back, waiting and seeing,” Ms. Guice said.

Her re-installment and Ms. Butler’s, she insisted, would help draw people back. And given the privations of her long exile, much of it spent in Houston, she would not be fazed by living in the ward’s darkness and isolation, she suggested.

She showed no regrets about the fate of her old house.

“I never did find the den,” Ms. Guice said. “It just shoved straight off. It might be floating in the gulf.”

Still, the complications of the demonstration project on Delery Street raise questions about its usefulness as a prototype. The two houses were financed by Acorn and a California bank, and the two women are planning to repay their loans using their insurance proceeds and money they hope will be forthcoming from Louisiana’s Road Home housing aid program. Louisiana State University’s School of Architecture helped design the houses, students from the school helped build them, young people from Covenant House did odd jobs, a church provided landscaping, and even the novelist Richard Ford, who recently moved back to the city, pitched in.

How often this process could be replicated is unclear, though Acorn has money for more loans. Some believe that a neighborhood as destitute as this one cannot come back without large-scale intervention.

“I think we have a problem of quantity, and anything that can’t be delivered in quantity is not a suitable prototype, regardless of the fantastic intentions,” said Andrés Duany, the Miami architect and planner who has played a leading role in this city’s efforts at rebuilding. “The verification is not aesthetics, not the degree of good will; it’s quantity.”

But under Thursday’s bright sun, the focus was not on the hurdles.

“If you try not to focus on how bad everything is, you can focus on what is good,” Allan Jones, an electrician who worked on the two houses, said as he surveyed the bleak landscape. “There is potential.”

Mr. Ford spoke at the ceremony of the “valiant and hopeful house-raising,” and those words captured the spirit of an enterprise that seemed as much a challenge to the future as a foundation for something new.

When Ms. Butler moved to the area nearly 60 years ago, it was still a semi-wilderness, recalled Tanya Harris, her granddaughter and an Acorn official.

“This was a shot in the dark,” Ms. Harris said. “This was a leap of faith.”

Posted by M at 20:08:45 | Permalink | No Comments »

Plan to upgrade Coliseum unveiled as part of effort to land 2016 Olympics

By Lisa Dillman, Times Staff Writer
February 23, 2007

Coliseum

Consider it an Olympic-sized task: Dressing up, and modernizing the historic Coliseum without leaving any lasting fingerprints.


Results of the careful balancing act were unveiled with plans for a $112-million temporary renovation of the 84-year-old facility, announced Thursday by the group attempting to bring the 2016 Summer Games to Los Angeles.

The cost, which includes $20 million for installation of a running track, would be covered by Olympic revenues, according to bid chairman Barry Sanders.

Since the Coliseum, with its historic landmark status, cannot be permanently changed, the project team put forth a design that suspends 204 luxury suites over the existing rim. Capacity would be approximately 83,000, down from the current 92,000.

“This came to me at 3 in the morning. What the hell do I do here?” architect Jay Flood said after a news conference at the Coliseum. “And that’s the truth. Working with my committee, they were very encouraging on this and when they saw the images we came up with, they were ecstatic. A layering with the new with the old. The temporary aspect allows a lot of flexibility.”

There is also a Southern California element — sun shades. The vinyl fabric shades, sitting atop a steel “space frame” that would encircle most of the venue, cover about 70 rows of seating. This steel superstructure would also support the luxury suites. The torch and peristyle would remain untouched and uncovered. In addition, the stadium floor would be raised 10 feet for the track.

Temporary enhancements to the Coliseum, which was the main Olympic stadium when Los Angeles was host to the Games in 1932 and 1984, are key elements of the city’s bid to become the U.S. candidate. In less than a week, an 11-member United States Olympic Committee (USOC) evaluation committee will be here for a three-day visit before traveling to Chicago, March 5-7.

Chicago’s temporary stadium, located in Washington Park on the city’s south side, would seat 80,000 and be downsized to 5,000 following the Games, costing an estimated $366 million.

The USOC will decide between Chicago and Los Angeles on April 14. Competition between the cities is taking on some of the qualities of a political campaign. Chicago bid chairman Patrick G. Ryan was quoted by the Associated Press, speaking about the difference between the two cities.

“Los Angeles will host the Games in existing facilities. They’ll look the same before, during and after,” Ryan said Thursday in Chicago.

The architectural plan for the Coliseum suggested otherwise.

“In 2016, the newly designed Coliseum will glow spectacularly,” said Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa in a statement.

Said Sanders: “It’s already very, very good. But it doesn’t have a sunshade. It doesn’t have luxury suites and it will. But is it good? This is great.”

The plans, of course, are contingent on Los Angeles’ selection by the International Olympic Committee (IOC) in 2009. Potential competition could include Tokyo, Rio de Janeiro, Madrid and Rome or Milan, among others.

The arrival of an NFL team to play in the Coliseum could make the issue of a temporary renovation a moot point.

A successful Los Angeles bid means construction would start in January 2016. Officials said that, after the Games, it would take about three months to restore the Coliseum to its familiar image. The time frame would run into USC’s football season, but USC general counsel Todd Dickey said he didn’t expect it to be an issue.

“They probably wouldn’t be tearing anything down until after the football season,” he said. “It would just stay there until we were done in early December.”

The other constituency involved was preservationists.

Los Angeles Conservancy executive director Linda Dishman said she saw the plans for the proposed enhancements about two weeks ago.

“We were pleased they were very sensitive to the historical character of the Coliseum,” she said. “I thought their sensitivity was very important.”

That seemed to be the theme of the day. Flood called it an upgrade to “this wonderful old lady.”

“The secret of this is — don’t touch the Coliseum,” he said.


lisa.dillman@latimes.com

*

(INFOBOX BELOW)

Remaking an icon

Temporary enhancements to the Coliseum, the hub when Los Angeles was host of the 1932 and 1984 Summer Olympic Games, are the key to the city’s bid for the 2016 Games. The anticipated expense, in 2007 dollars:

Track installation $20 million
Exterior installation $90 million
Restoration to original condition $10 million
Subtotal $120 million
Salvage value of structural steel — $ 8 million
Total $112 million
Posted by M at 18:12:11 | Permalink | No Comments »

Playing Olympic dress-up is far from the right path

Helene Elliott: February 23, 2007

Picture the Mona Lisa wearing a leather jacket and miniskirt and clutching an iPod.

It wouldn’t work. Imposing a modern sensibility on a classic icon creates a culture clash that the brain simply can’t process.

The temporary steel-framed addition that would envelop the Coliseum if Los Angeles gets the 2016 Summer Olympics would have the same jarring effect.

The $112-million project, which would be funded by Games-generated revenues, was unveiled Thursday by the Southern California Committee for the Olympic Games. Designed for use only during the Olympics and Paralympics, it’s a lukewarm compromise between embracing the 84-year-old Coliseum’s grandeur and acknowledging it needs extensive updates no one wants to pay for.


The superstructure would stand three feet outside the existing walls and encircle the venue except for the peristyle. In renderings it resembles a saber-tooth necklace of towers that would support 204 luxury suites, vinyl sun shades, and elevators. It has no “wow” factor, just fleeting functionality.

Barry Sanders, chairman of the bid committee, said the Los Angeles Games plan incorporated traditional, new and planned structures “and put them in a crown in which the leading jewel is this facility here, the Coliseum. No city in the world bidding for the Olympics would not want to have the Coliseum as the jewel in their crown.”

This setting isn’t worthy of its jewel.

Los Angeles wasn’t alone in its stadium quandary. Faced with similar problems before the 1992 Barcelona Games, officials there kept the outside of their majestic 1929-built stadium and totally renovated the inside, skillfully blending old and new.

The plan for the Coliseum would marry new to old with adhesive tape.

Chicago, a co-finalist with Los Angeles for the U.S. Olympic Committee’s backing in the international selection process, plans to build an 80,000-seat stadium that would later become a 5,000-seat venue. That solution isn’t perfect either, since it’s costly and isn’t the grand legacy the International Olympic Committee likes the host cities to inherit after the flame is extinguished.

The USOC will announce on April 14 which city it will back in the final round. It might not matter. The IOC may turn up its aristocratic nose at Los Angeles because the Games have been here twice, in 1932 and 1984, and it may scorn Chicago because many venues would have to be built. The higher the construction tab, the lower the potential profit. And no one wants a repeat of the 1976 Montreal Games; the debt for those Games was retired only a few months ago.

The Coliseum is owned by the state. It’s a state and national landmark, which complicates efforts to alter it.

The NFL has the money and clout to do it, even though its building fund was depleted after it approved a loan to help finance a $1.4-billion stadium in New Jersey for the Jets and Giants. Without a team or an owner poised in Los Angeles, the NFL isn’t rushing to open its checkbook. Nor should it.

The architectural plan introduced Thursday “basically is sending a message to the [U.S.] Olympic Committee that the Coliseum is functional with or without an NFL franchise,” said Bernard Parks, president of the Coliseum Commission and a member of the Los Angeles City Council.

“If you had your druthers, it would be great if all of it were done permanently. But what they’re asking to do for the Olympics, you can’t do in six months on a permanent basis.”

Parks also said that the Coliseum Commission is preparing for negotiations with USC, which has played football there since 1923, to “ascertain what, as a tenant, USC might want to see in the stadium as it relates to their 80,000 people that show up for every game.” So the Coliseum might get lasting enhancements even if the Olympics go elsewhere.

Bill Chadwick, a Coliseum Commission member and former president, said permanent upgrades for the Olympics would be ideal except for that little problem of no funding. The NFL has estimated the cost of a state-of-the art stadium inside the Coliseum walls would exceed $800 million.

“In my bathroom I have taped on my mirror, ‘Can you explain this to a mother in Fresno?’ ” Chadwick said. “How do you explain to somebody that lives outside of Los Angeles that spending money on the Coliseum is good for their children, for their child’s public safety or health care? You can’t do it.”

Chadwick says he’s not sure the Coliseum needs major renovations, that for perhaps $150 million it could be turned into a “traditional football stadium” with updated rest rooms, concession stands and seats. “We don’t have a tremendous amount of history in Los Angeles. This is our history,” he said. “I’m a big fan of preserving it.”

Preserving integrity would be nice too.

Posted by M at 18:09:42 | Permalink | No Comments »

Chicago tweaks rival as L.A. touts face-lift

By Kathy Bergen, Tribune staff reporter
Published February 23, 2007

In Chicago’s battle against Los Angeles to become the U.S. bidder for the 2016 Olympic Games, the volleys intensified Thursday, less than a week before evaluation teams begin city visits.


On the West Coast, Los Angeles unveiled a $112 million temporary face-lift to its historic Memorial Coliseum, adding 204 luxury suites and restoring the track surrounding the main field so the facility could host track and field as well as opening and closing ceremonies.

In the Midwest, Chicago’s bid leader, Patrick Ryan, took some light-hearted jabs at the rival city. Speaking to the Union League Club, Ryan was uncharacteristically scrappy, saying Chicago’s bid will outshine Los Angeles in terms of creating an urban legacy, having a single Olympic Village, as opposed to clusters of dorms, and having games that are concentrated geographically, making life easier for athletes.

Meanwhile, Mayor Richard Daley hinted at just how badly the city wants these Summer Games in remarks to hospitality industry leaders.

“In the last three days I’ve see more developers look at more land, more development, than at anyplace else in America … because they realize the Olympics can portray Chicago differently globally,” Daley told about 200 event planners attending a Chicago Convention and Tourism Bureau sales presentation at the Peninsula Chicago.

He cited 1992 Olympic host city Barcelona, a smaller city with no Fortune 500 companies, as an example.

“They market Barcelona as … one of the finest global cities in the world to do business, and everything else, there’s one reason: They had the Olympics,” Daley said. “It transformed the city and continues to transform the city.”

Los Angeles, a two-time Olympic host city, raised the competitive bar Tuesday by revealing its plan to build a temporary addition to its Memorial Coliseum. The design would add not only luxury suites, but also sun shading, an entire suite level with 2,400 seats and a new structure and skin around the perimeter adorned with Olympic images.

“The Coliseum has been the site of incredible events for more than 80 years, but it never shines brighter than during the Olympic Games,” Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa said in a statement. “In 2016, the newly designed Coliseum will glow spectacularly.”

The construction, because of its temporary nature, would be paid for with Olympic revenue, said David Simon, president of the Southern California Committee for the Olympic Games.

Chicago, too, plans to use Olympic revenue to pay the lion’s share of its $366 million temporary stadium in Washington Park on the South Side.

The International Olympic Committee allows Olympic revenue to be used for operating games, and this can include the construction of temporary facilities or the adaptation of existing venues.

Los Angeles’ plan appears to be a smart one, said Marc Ganis, president of Sportscorp Ltd., a Chicago-based consultancy.

“You can get $300,000 to $400,000 for each luxury suite, so you’re almost paying for the renovation with that,” he said.

“I don’t know if it’s the tipping point that will get them the Olympics, but it’s helpful,” he said.

The Chicago 2016 Committee said the Coliseum update was expected.

“This isn’t news to us,” spokesman Patrick Sandusky said. “It doesn’t impact our plans. We continue to focus on the U.S. Olympic Committee visit in two weeks.”

A USOC evaluation team will visit Los Angeles next week and Chicago the week after. The organization will select a U.S. bid city April 14, and the worldwide competition will come in October 2009.

Now that the domestic rivals are in the home stretch, rhetoric is heating up.

In his remarks Thursday morning, Ryan compared Chicago’s bid to Los Angeles’ proposal, something he’d shied away from until now.

Chicago’s games are compact, centered in the heart of the city, with rowing, for instance, in Monroe Harbor, he noted.

“For rowing in Los Angeles, you’ve got to go from L.A. all the way down to Long Beach,” he said, with comic inflection.

And Chicago’s Olympic Village would be one central development, just south of McCormick Place, he noted. The $1.1 billion facility would be financed by a private developer and sold as housing after the games

In Los Angeles, “they are going to be in clusters of dormitories,” he said. “And in a day of security, we can secure that perimeter much more effectively with one village.”

Simon, of the Los Angeles team, declined to compare his city’s bid to Chicago’s plans, saying the USOC asked the cities not to compare themselves to each other.

But speaking of the L.A. bid, he said, the Olympic Village will be a compact series of buildings at the University of California at Los Angeles “that can be easily fenced and secured. They are not spread out.”

When asked what led him to make prickly remarks about Los Angeles, Ryan said he was irritated by earlier comments by Los Angeles bid officials about Chicago’s weather. One official was reported to wisecrack about 30 m.p.h. winds off the lake.

“L.A. doesn’t have a lot to talk about other than our weather,” Ryan said in a press briefing after the talk, and he noted the Olympics will be summer games.

Asked about the weather issue, Simon offered his own bit of humor: “I refuse to be drawn into a comparison of our weather to Chicago’s, and you can quote me on that.”

———-

kbergen@tribune.com

Posted by M at 17:21:38 | Permalink | No Comments »

Public housing hearing begins today

Congress will look at post-Katrina needs
Thursday, February 22, 2007

By Gwen Filosa

When a congressional hearing over affordable housing in post-Katrina New Orleans opens today, at least one player in the redevelopment process is praying for common ground to emerge in the angry debate over what to do with the city’s crumbling public housing complexes.

“I am scared to death that this thing will end up in the courts for years while the residents are placed on hold,” said Jim Kelly, president of the nonprofit developer Providence Community Housing, connected to the Archdiocese of New Orleans. “Please pray for a spirit of humility and collaboration.”

U.S. Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif., will lead the hearing, which is set for today at 2 p.m. at Lawless Memorial Chapel on the campus of Dillard University, 2601 Gentilly Blvd. At issue is whether Waters will lead a charge for Congress to demand the reopening of all vacant public housing in the city and try to bar demolition.

Waters, chairwoman of a House subcommittee that controls housing issues, has pushed the Department of Housing and Urban Development to begin tearing down the worst of the complexes, while allowing residents to return to those that sustained less damage during Hurricane Katrina.

Kelly’s organization has vowed to replace the apartments at the Lafitte complex near Treme with the exact number of subsidized homes — 896. He recently advised the government to repair and reopen at least 200 apartments at each complex, including Lafitte, while the public housing complexes are revamped in phases instead of one fell swoop.

By “phasing in” the redevelopment of complexes, the Housing Authority of New Orleans can accomplish what both sides want, said Kelly: return families who were forced out of their homes by the storm, and create better, safer communities. Providence has also put up $2.5 million for support services and counseling to guide poor displaced families through the entire transition.

“I’ve put that out there,” Kelly said Wednesday. “I believe HUD should let people come home.”

Kelly said he doesn’t know what else his firm can do to bring about progress in the struggle to rebuild housing for the city’s poorest residents, 18 months after the levee failures swamped New Orleans and prompted HANO to shutter three of its largest developments, and most of a fourth.

HANO has spent the past decades before Katrina letting go of thousands of public housing homes.

Before Katrina, HANO housed 5,100 families in New Orleans, with more than 2,000 additional units sitting vacant. These days, some 1,200 families have returned, while HANO plans to demolish some 7,300 apartments to make room for modern, fresh neighborhoods that no longer crowd the poor into insular brick complexes that resembled islands of crime and poverty long before the storm.

The political argument is fueled by a federal lawsuit, filed by public housing residents against HANO last June, claiming their civil rights have been violated by the government’s decision to demolish and rebuild four complexes.

That lawsuit continues, claiming racial discrimination and unfair eviction of tenants, and demanding the reopening of the complexes.

Highjacking the issue

Kelly is among a contingent of locals on the front lines of redevelopment who fear the entire discussion of public housing, and caring for poor families, has been highjacked by rabble-rousers and activists who don’t represent the majority of families who rely on subsidized housing.

Since Katrina, each public hearing over the debate draws the same handful of residents and their advocates, and the same message to reopen the old complexes and forgo redevelopment.

Meanwhile, there are residents who never want to return to the brick buildings called St. Bernard or Lafitte, where central air conditioning and modern appliances were unheard of, and scores of vacant buildings attracted nothing that was positive.

“Every resident I speak to wants both, to come home and have a new apartment or home,” Kelly said.

In January, at least one longtime public housing resident, and resident leader, Emelda Paul of Lafitte, dropped herself from the federal lawsuit. She has relocated to New Orleans after a long exile in Arizona.

City Councilwoman Stacy Head, whose district includes the dilapidated C.J. Peete, home to 170 families pre-Katrina, said “mixed-income housing” will help New Orleans make a healthy recovery.

“From the immediate issues of health care delivery, education and crime to the long-term issues of revitalizing communities and empowering people to escape from poverty,” Head said in an e-mail message, where she described today’s hearings as a possible maneuver by activists to require HUD to reopen complexes “immediately” and ban all demolitions.

“I am opposed to such a move as I am a strong believer in mixed-income housing and deconcentrating poverty,” said Head, who added that her constituents who lived in public housing don’t want to return — but also don’t want to speak out for fear of being criticized by their peers.

“They’re afraid to speak out,” said Head, who called on HANO to better inform its residents of their plans.

“There is a communication breakdown and a rightful level of distrust by residents of HANO.” Since 2002, HUD has redeveloped half of the city’s largest public housing developments: the former St. Thomas, Guste and Fischer, along with the new Desire and Florida, both ravaged by flooding.

Decades of neglect

Donald Babers, the HUD official appointed to direct HANO, said Katrina made a bad situation even worse for New Orleans public housing residents.

“For decades, these properties suffered from neglect,” Babers said in a recent statement to The Times-Picayune. Residents “deserve something better than the crime-ridden, gang-infested, crumbling buildings that always seem to make their way into the headlines. We need neighborhoods where families can thrive, and the next generation has hope.”

Mixed-use and mixed-income communities have become success stories in Atlanta and Seattle, said Babers, who challenged the criticism by activists that HANO has shut out the poor by closing down its flood- damaged properties instead of renovating them.

“Every one of these residents has either been given a new place to live in the redeveloped property or has been given a voucher — a roof is over every head,” Babers said. “When Katrina struck, we were making progress toward the redevelopment of B.W. Cooper and C.J. Peete, and we had begun the planning process at Lafitte and St. Bernard.”

But attorney Judith Browne-Dianis, of the Advancement Project in Washington, D.C., and one of the lead lawyers suing HUD on behalf of residents, said the vouchers — paying up to $1,490 for rent — cannot be used in a city short on apartments while rents have jumped by more than 70 percent since Katrina.

“These vouchers, and other housing vouchers, are useless in New Orleans,” Browne-Dianis testified Feb. 6 before the U.S. House of Representatives’ Financial Services Committee. “In the rare instance in which a vacancy exists, landlords will not accept housing vouchers.”

Babers blames the HANO of the past for neglecting its properties and allowing them to deteriorate. As a locally run agency, HANO fell into rampant mismanagement, squandering millions upon millions in federal money that was meant for maintenance and building upkeep.

New Orleans can emerge from the ruins of Katrina, and long-term poverty, with mixed-income projects that have become the “new urban paradigm” in many other cities because of their successes, Babers said.

“Families have benefited from the opportunity to live in safer, healthier environments and to break the cycle of poverty,” Babers said.

HANO’s next board meeting is scheduled for Feb. 28 at 10 a.m. at the Fischer Community Center, 1400 Semmes St. The HANO Web site is www.hano.org

. . . . . . .

Gwen Filosa can be reached at gfilosa@timespicayune.com or (504) 826-3304.

 

 

 

 

 

Posted by M at 05:50:34 | Permalink | No Comments »

Volunteer Group Lags in Replacing Gulf Houses

Lee Celano for The New York Times

Edria Fusello, left, a volunteer, with Ricardo Crespio, who has a Habitat for Humanity home in New Orleans.

By LESLIE EATON and STEPHANIE STROM; Published: February 22, 2007

Corrections Appended

BAY ST. LOUIS, Miss. — In the two years following the 2004 tsunami in the Indian Ocean, Habitat for Humanity International, the nondenominational Christian ministry, built or repaired 8,500 houses in Indonesia, Thailand, India and Sri Lanka.

Lee Celano for The New York Times
Volunteers at Musicians’ Village, a Habitat for Humanity project in New Orleans that focuses on bringing back traditional jazz musicians.
Lee Celano for The New York Times
Kenneth J. Meinert, center, coordinator of Habitat’s hurricane response efforts, in Bay St. Louis, Miss., with Cindy Griffin, executive director of the Metro Jackson affiliate, and Hank Pinkerton, a volunteer.

Habitat for Humanity seemed poised to do the same thing along the Gulf Coast after Hurricane Katrina hit in 2005. Just days after the storm, its chief executive appeared on CNN, promising to build and repair as many homes as it could pay for, “hopefully in the thousands.” The organization quickly mustered 50,000 volunteers, raised $127 million, and attracted prominent backers like President Bush and the New Orleans jazz luminaries Harry Connick Jr. and Branford Marsalis.

 

But almost 18 months after storms destroyed more than 250,000 homes, Habitat for Humanity says it has built just 10 houses for poor hurricane victims here, 36 in New Orleans, and a total of 416 along the entire coast, from Alabama to Texas. More are under construction, for a total of 702.

That slower pace reflects, in part, the more complex houses that Habitat builds in the United States, as well as the mind-numbing issues — involving insurance costs and government regulations — that seem to have bogged down efforts to rebuild after Hurricanes Katrina and Rita.

But Habitat International is starting to face criticism that its procedures are slow, rigid and perhaps unsuited to helping disaster victims, however rewarding its efforts are for its volunteers. The organization is working through its independent local affiliates, which function like franchises and which have tended to build a dozen houses a year each.

“I don’t think they were prepared to undertake the massive rebuilding efforts required after Katrina,” Fred Carl Jr., who was the Hurricane Katrina housing coordinator for Gov. Haley Barbour of Mississippi, wrote in an e-mail message.

“I think they’re very good at building a few homes through their local chapters,” Mr. Carl continued, “but this was a whole new ballgame and I think they may have underestimated the vast challenge this involved.”

This criticism is echoed by some leaders of charitable and housing groups who are reluctant to be quoted because they work with Habitat. Some suggest that Habitat’s insistence on working through affiliates has slowed it. The group has spent $61.5 million of the $127 million it raised for the Gulf Coast. Nearly three dozen of the houses it has built were paid for by other charities.

Even within the organization, some have questioned its continued emphasis on building from scratch, rather than on helping people repair and rebuild damaged houses.

Habitat for Humanity officials say they hit the ground running after the storms and are pleased with the pace of building. The group says it will meet its goal of 1,000 houses under construction or completed by the end of August, the second anniversary of Hurricane Katrina, and it plans to build 1,000 more.

Along the Gulf Coast, “we had built 57 homes a year, now we’re building 57 a month,” said Kenneth J. Meinert, a a senior vice president of Habitat for Humanity who left his job running a building company in Canada to coordinate the group’s storm response. “In these conditions, to have built 700 homes, it’s an absolute work of God,” he added.

Habitat, with more than $1 billion in annual revenues, is based in Atlanta and Americus, Ga., and has operations worldwide. Its mission often seems as much about providing spiritual fulfillment to its volunteers as it is about improving new homeowners’ lives.

“Habitat really taps into this American ethos, this real barn-raising sensibility,” said Jerome P. Baggett, a professor at the Jesuit School of Theology at Berkeley, who has written a book on the group. “But building many houses is more complex than building the occasional barn.”

Traditionally, Habitat volunteers raise money and use donated materials to build $60,000 houses in their own communities. In the region today, most of the volunteers come from “away,” as Mr. Meinert put it, and the group has used some factory-built modular houses.

In an interview here, Mr. Meinert said that about 400 of the 700 houses were what the group calls House in a Box projects, framed outside the Gulf Coast by volunteers and then trucked south for assembly.

Habitat for Humanity lent volunteers to house-gutting groups, he said, and has given some of its money to other organizations working on the Gulf Coast, including $3 million to help finance home repairs.

So far, Mr. Meinert said, of the $61.5 million spent, about $15 million has gone to Louisiana affiliates and $15 million to those in Mississippi.

Critics have questioned Habitat’s continued emphasis on building new homes rather than on rehabilitation. They note that other groups have done more with this approach: volunteers from Southern Baptist churches mucked out 12,000 houses in Mississippi alone, and have rebuilt or repaired 3,000, while volunteers from Mennonite congregations have repaired hundreds of houses and built 31 new ones last year. Even the small Southern Mutual Help Association, a nonprofit that reported revenues of $3.3 million in 2005, has helped rehabilitate or rebuild more than 500.

In one successful variation on the national group’s procedures, Habitat’s Northern Virginia affiliate has rebuilt two dozen houses in East Biloxi, Miss., and plans to build 50 more this year. Karen Cleveland, the executive director of the Virginia group, said it paid $10,000 to $15,000 a house.

Like others urging Habitat International toward flexibility, Ms. Cleveland traveled to its offices in Americus to make the case for a similar approach across the organization. She was told the group was committed to the House in a Box strategy.

Ronnie McBrayer, the former director of Habitat for Humanity’s affiliate in Walton County, Fla., said his group’s efforts to help rebuild the town of Pearlington, Miss., had been met with indifference and then hostility from some organization officials. Habitat insisted its name be removed from that project, which was focused on providing interim housing for people living in tents, he said.

Mr. Meinert of Habitat International said the Florida affiliate was doing work that was not traditionally part of the group’s mission. “We would not take donors’ money and send it there in large quantities to build temporary housing,” he said.

Mr. McBrayer, now a hospital chaplain, said there was a conflict of values between his affiliate and national leaders. “Our grass-roots group values speed and putting a roof over heads,” he said.

The organization had some experience in disaster recovery before the tsunami. But the wave of donations that followed it prompted the group to create a special unit that has spent about $42 million of the more than $71 million it collected for building and repairing 8,500 houses overseas, said Mike Carscaddon, the organization’s executive vice president.

The money went farther there in part, he said, because houses in developing countries are typically smaller than homes here and cost about $5,000 apiece.

Habitat for Humanity does not give houses away; it provides 20-year no-interest mortgages and uses the payments to finance more houses. To qualify, families must have incomes well below the median for their areas, but steady enough to cover mortgages. (Traditionally, 90 percent of applicants are rejected.)

They must also have good credit, agree to contribute several hundred hours of “sweat equity,” attend classes on finances and homeownership and in some areas, including New Orleans, come up with several thousand dollars for taxes and insurance.

Those strict requirements have frustrated some applicants for one Habitat project, Musicians’ Village, set on eight acres in the Upper Ninth Ward of New Orleans. The project was publicized as a way to bring back the city’s displaced traditional jazz and blues musicians, though it will include nonmusicians, too. It will also have several duplex apartments for older musicians and a community center.

Some musicians have complained that Habitat has rejected them, and others that its processes discouraged them from applying.

Tanio Hingle, the bass drummer with the New Birth Brass Band, said he had applied for the program but was not pursuing it. He said he thought Habitat should provide housing first and worry about the paperwork later.

Complaints like his started surfacing in the New Orleans news media last year. Mr. Connick and Mr. Marsalis recently asked Jackie Harris, a music producer who now works for them, to help musicians through the process for the Habitat project, which will eventually include more than 70 houses on-site and 150 in the area.

Ms. Harris said the musicians and Habitat had misunderstood one other but were adjusting. “It’s been a learning curve for both,” she said.

Habitat officials say that in New Orleans and in Covington, which is across Lake Pontchartrain, their efforts have encouraged homeowners and private developers to build or rehabilitate nearby houses.

And they say they have been flexible after the hurricanes, reducing the hours of required sweat equity, for example, and allowing musicians to use performance records rather than pay stubs to prove income.

Along the Gulf Coast, those fortunate enough to qualify for Habitat housing call it a blessing. Sylvia Ragan, a dialysis technician, is moving into a house here on Union Street after living in a trailer for 18 months with her daughter, Denetra Shelley, who is 11.

“I couldn’t pay anybody for the blood, sweat and tears that went into this house,” Ms. Ragan said. “I will cherish this forever.”

Correction: February 23, 2007

Because of an editing error, a front-page article yesterday about the slow pace of home building by Habitat for Humanity in areas hit by Hurricane Katrina referred incorrectly in some copies to the Jesuit School of Theology at Berkeley, where Jerome P. Baggett, who wrote a book about Habitat, is a professor. It is an independent institution; it is not part of the University of California.

Correction: February 28, 2007

A front-page article on Thursday about the slow pace of home building by Habitat for Humanity in areas hit by Hurricane Katrina carried an outdated reference to Kenneth J. Meinert, who is coordinating Habitat’s storm response. He is a senior vice president of Habitat for Humanity International, no longer a volunteer.

Posted by M at 05:16:19 | Permalink | No Comments »

Biodiesel moves almost into mainstream in Bay Area

FUELING A REVOLUTION

Thursday, February 22, 2007

Ash Brecken fills her car with biodiesel at Biofuel Oasis... Ahri Golden fills her station wagon with biodiesel at one... Robin Vest fills a spare container with biodiesel, which ... New life for old grease. Chronicle graphic by John Blanchard


About a year ago, Paul McNees chose to change his life by changing his fuel.

 

He sold his Saturn sport utility vehicle and bought a diesel-powered Mercedes-Benz. A mechanic whipped it into running order and replaced the soft rubber fuel lines with something sturdier.

Then the El Sobrante teacher started burning biodiesel — a fuel cooked up not from petroleum but from vegetable oil, often waste oil from restaurants or food processing plants.

“I just couldn’t justify filling up that tank with gasoline anymore for a multitude of reasons,” said McNees, 43, citing global warming and the war in Iraq. “This has been great. It’s totally cleaned out the engine. It runs great, has a lot more power. It sort of smells like french fries — it doesn’t have that noxious diesel smell.”

A small but growing number of Bay Area drivers like McNees are trading their gasoline-fueled autos for biodiesel-powered cars. How many is hard to tell. The biodiesel industry is nascent, largely unregulated and informally organized. But experts agree that biodiesel use is growing.

Nationally, biodiesel consumption is up sharply — from 500,000 gallons in 1999 to more than 75 million gallons in 2005. In the Bay Area, the number of customers filling up at Berkeley’s Biofuel Oasis — one of the region’s few public biodiesel stations — has climbed from about 200 three years ago to about 1,800 today.

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and President Bush have mentioned the fuel in their respective plans to cut greenhouse gases and reduce petroleum dependence. The University of California recently signed a landmark deal with oil giant BP to develop biofuels.

Much of biodiesel’s appeal stems from the fuel’s ability to perform as well as petroleum diesel while emitting fewer exhaust materials that cause smog, particulate pollution and global warming. According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, pure biodiesel emits 67 percent fewer unburned hydrocarbons, 48 percent less carbon monoxide and 47 percent fewer particulates but 10 percent more nitrogen oxides.

Yet, despite its benefits and growing popularity, biodiesel might not be the fuel of the future because, as demand grows, the amount of land needed to produce the oils could become untenable, experts say.

Biodiesel is created in a relatively simple process known as transesterification. Producers, including fuel companies or home brewers, start with clean or waste vegetable oil, then add methanol and a catalyst such as lye. A chemical reaction produces biodiesel and glycerine, which can be separated easily. The glycerine can be used in a variety of products, from soap to manufactured fireplace logs.

Biodiesel has been popular for years among farmers in the Midwest and in the South, where virgin soybean oil typically is used to produce the fuel. Yet its use in the West, until recently, was largely limited to hobbyists who brewed the fuel at home and people who prided themselves on not using oil.

The home brewers include people like Ben Jordan, who makes his own biodiesel and teaches an alternative fuels class at City College of San Francisco, in which students create a batch of biodiesel.

“It’s very dangerous and potentially very problematic,” he said. “You’re dealing with methanol and lye, and when you mix it together, it is very explosive and toxic. It’s not something to mess around with. However, if you know what you’re doing, you can safely and easily make it in your own home.”

Home brewers deserve much of the credit for the percolating interest in biodiesel, said Anna Halpern-Lande of Tellurion Biodiesel, a San Francisco marketing and distribution firm.

“The hobbyists make up a very small portion of the market,” she said, “but they play a critical role: They capture the public’s attention.”

In the past couple of years, biodiesel and other so-called alternative fuels have moved out of garages and workshops and into the mainstream. On Wednesday, Safeway, which operates 300 fuel stations in the United States, opened a biodiesel test pump in West Seattle. The fuel also is becoming popular with celebrities: Country music legend Willie Nelson, for example, is a partner in BioWillie Diesel, which markets the natural fuel primarily to truck stops.

The change hasn’t gone unnoticed by some of biodiesel’s earlier adopters, such as Ahri Golden, 32, a public radio documentarian from Berkeley, who has burned biodiesel in her 1980 Mercedes for four years.

“It was kind of hippie-ish,” Golden said as she filled up at Biofuel Oasis. “Now you see a lot more people with nicer cars and more money coming for the practicality and not just the ideology.”

Yet it isn’t practical for everyone. New diesel cars aren’t sold in California because of air-quality regulations, and buying an older diesel can be competitive, biodiesel users say. No significant modifications are required to use biodiesel, but because it is a solvent, soft rubber gas lines need to be replaced with stronger tubing.

Biodiesel stations also are still hard to find: There are just nine in the nine-county Bay Area, according to the National Biodiesel Board. The small-scale operations usually have limited business hours.

“You can’t just run down to the gas station,” said biodiesel user Jonathan Austin of Oakland. “You’ve got to plan ahead.”

Because fueling stations have limited hours, many biodiesel users fill their tanks, as well as one or more 5-gallon containers that can be stored in the trunk or stashed in the garage. Although the process of making it can be dangerous, the biodiesel itself is safe because it burns at a much higher temperature.

And while some users don’t like to use petroleum diesel, the fuels can be mixed or used interchangeably. Many biodiesel users fill their tanks with blends — B-20, a blend containing 20 percent biodiesel, is common.

Filling up with biodiesel can also be more costly depending on fuel prices and a vehicle’s fuel efficiency, although many experts believe the price will drop as use of the fuel becomes more widespread. At Biofuel Oasis, the current supply of B-99 biodiesel, made from reclaimed soy oil from a potato chip factory, sells for $3.65 a gallon. Gasoline sells for around $2.79 a gallon nearby and petroleum diesel for about $3.01 a gallon. However, cars that run on diesel — including biodiesel — can get 40 to 50 miles per gallon.

Many biodiesel users say they care less about the cost and more about cutting America’s dependence on oil and combatting climate change. Their bumper stickers reflect those opinions. “Biodiesel — no war required,” read one on a car waiting to fill up at Biodiesel Oasis. “This car powered by vegetable oil,” read another.

Jennifer Radtke, one of the five women who own Biofuel Oasis, thinks growing concern about climate change and the diminishing oil supply is driving the popularity of alternative fuels.

“A lot of our customers switched to biodiesel because of the war,” she said. “That’s probably common in the Bay Area, but across the country, it’s probably because of concern about climate change and renewable energy. And that it’s so cool.”

Yet biodiesel faces serious obstacles before it can become the fuel of the future.

A current challenge is availability. Interest in biodiesel may be rising, but so far local production isn’t. Just one firm manufactures biodiesel in the Bay Area, according to the National Biodiesel Board, but two Bay Area plants are under construction and are expected to be producing the fuel later this year.

Yokayo Biofuels in Ukiah (Mendocino County) has produced biodiesel from waste vegetable oils for five years. The company only recently began making enough to supply Biofuel Oasis, in addition to three stations in Mendocino County.

Kumar Plocher, Yokayo’s president and founder, said that although the process of making biodiesel is relatively simple, it can be difficult to efficiently and consistently produce high-quality fuel. Some firms, he said, have invested in top-of-the-line equipment and hired petroleum and chemical industry experts but still failed to produce and distribute the fuel.

Yokayo has grown slowly and learned along the way, he said. The company is still a small producer, he said, making about 15,000 gallons a month.

“Biodiesel has a lot of interesting little nuances that you need to get to know,” he said. “It’s its own beast, its own molecule.”

Like oil, biodiesel may have its limits because of the sources of the vegetable oils used to produce the fuel.

“People are really excited about biofuels now,” Plocher said. “But there isn’t much knowledge about them. For instance, the issue of sustainability.”

Much of the Bay Area’s biodiesel is produced from waste vegetable oil that comes from restaurants — including burger joints and Chez Panisse. Although that supply is now plentiful, it won’t always be, especially if biodiesel use and healthier eating habits become more popular.

“It’s extremely attractive and cost-effective, but it’s very limited,” said Severin Borenstein, head of the Energy Institute at UC Berkeley.

Most of the biodiesel produced and used nationally is made from soybeans, which yield 50 gallons of biodiesel per acre, Plocher said. Sunflowers can produce up to 100 gallons an acre and canola (rapeseed) as much as 150 gallons an acre.

The huge amount of land required to grow biodiesel oil could crowd out food crops. Aware of that concern, some biodiesel producers have started importing palm oil from the tropics. But the growing popularity and production of palm oil for purposes including biodiesel has caused the destruction of rain forests in Malaysia and Indonesia, according to environmental groups, including Friends of the Earth.

Researchers are looking for more productive, and sustainable, sources of biofuel — including algae. They’re focusing primarily on four types of high-oil algae — diatoms, green algae, blue-green algae and golden algae — that could be cultivated in farms or ponds. Oils could be extracted using chemical solvents, enzymes, expeller presses, osmotic shock or ultrasonic shock waves.

But whatever its future, biodiesel has already generated a fleet of loyal fans who say they would never go back to petroleum diesel.

“It feels good to be living your own ethics,” McNees said after filling his tank at the Biofuel Oasis. “It is a little bit of a hassle, but knowing that I’m not adding to the problem makes it so worth it.”


New life for old grease

 

Used frying oil is one source of vegetable oil that can be made into biodiesel. A common method called transesterification breaks down cooking oil, resulting in two valuable products: glycerine, an additive to soaps, and methyl esters, the chemical name for biodiesel, which can fuel a diesel engine.

 

1. PREPARATION

– Vegetable oil poured into processor

– Oil is heated to 120° Fahrenheit

– Acidity level is checked

2. REACTOR

– Lye (alkaline base) and methanol (alcohol) are mixed in a separate container

– Solution is mixed with oil

3. SETTLING

– Oil is separated into glycerine and unwashed biodiesel

– Glycerine removed

4. WASHING

– Biodiesel is washed with water

5. PURIFICATION

– Oil is separated from water

– Water removed

– Processed biodiesel transferred to storage container

6. DISTRIBUTION

– Biodiesel is “dried” or allowed to settle

– Ready for fueling

 

Source: National Biodiesel Board

E-mail Michael Cabanatuan at mcabanatuan@sfchronicle.com.

This article appeared on page A - 1 of the San Francisco Chronicle

Posted by M at 05:03:21 | Permalink | No Comments »

History vs. Homogeneity in New Orleans Housing Fight

Fred R. Conrad/The New York Times
One of the complexes scheduled for demolition, the Lafitte housing project is ranked by some among the best public housing of its era.
By NICOLAI OUROUSSOFF; Published: February 22, 2007

NEW ORLEANS — In this hard-pressed city a proposal by the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development to demolish four public housing complexes has touched a raw nerve. The demolition, which would affect more than 4,500 housing units, represents for some the plight of a poor, black underclass displaced by Hurricane Katrina and struggling to return. It also represents the problems that faced the city even before the hurricane: poverty, crime and racial divisions.

The bluntness of HUD’s solution reflects a degree of historical amnesia that this wounded city cannot afford. In its rush to demolish the apartment complexes — and replace them with the kind of generic mixed-income suburban community so favored by Washington bureaucrats — the agency demonstrates great insensitivity to both the displaced tenants and the urban fabric of this city.

Offering perhaps a last chance to bring some sanity to this process, a congressional subcommittee is scheduled to open hearings here on Feb. 22 about the future of the city’s affordable housing. It is an opportunity to rethink HUD’s questionable vision and reappraise the role that architecture plays in society.

The hearings should help open up a process that so far has seemed anything but democratic. HUD took control of the four complexes from the Housing Authority of New Orleans in 2002 because of accusations of financial mismanagement. In order to implement the demolition plan, both agencies must comply with a section of the National Historic Preservation Act that requires an appraisal of the historic significance of any building more than 50 years old. But they have largely ignored testimony from of a long list of preservationists, including the Louisiana Landmarks Society and a local representative of the National Trust for Historic Preservation.

In arguing to save the buildings, preservationists point to the human scale of the apartment complexes, whose pitched slate roofs, elegant brickwork and low-rise construction reflect a subtle understanding of the city’s historical context without slavishly mimicking it.

Tellingly, neither housing agency has closely examined alternatives to demolition, like renovating some buildings in the complexes and replacing others. Although the Housing Authority of New Orleans says that modernizing existing developments would cost more than building new housing, it has yet to release cost breakdowns or the source of the figures. John Fernandez, an architecture professor at M.I.T. who examined all four of the complexes, has suggested that the extent of the storm’s damage has been overstated.

The housing agencies’ tabula rasa planning mentality recalls the worst aspects of the postwar Modernist agenda, which substituted a suburban model of homogeneity for an urban one of diversity. The proposal for “traditional-style” pastel houses, set in neat little rows on uniform lots, is a model of conformity that attacks the idea of the city as a place where competing values coexist.

This is reinforced by the plan’s tendency to isolate the new housing from the rest of the city. Often arranged along dead-end cul-de-sacs, the proposed developments lack the mix of big and small buildings, residential apartments and retail shops that could weave them into the surrounding urban fabric.

The point is not to return people to the same housing conditions that existed before Hurricane Katrina, but to distinguish between failures of social policy and design policy. Architects can’t determine the economic mix of residents in public housing developments nor provide education and health services. Their job is to give physical form to social and cultural values.

In this city that should begin with a fair appraisal of existing housing. With its low scale, narrow footprint and high-quality construction, for example, the 1940s Lafitte development, one of the four complexes slated for demolition, cannot be compared to Desire, a generic, shoddily constructed housing block, built more than a decade later. Some have suggested carving new roads through existing developments to anchor them more firmly into the surrounding neighborhoods.

Solutions like this might preclude the violent bulldozing of neighborhoods in a city so short of housing. A willingness to make case by case historical distinctions would result in a more historically layered urban composition, one that could, eventually, include contemporary architectural ideas as well.

For that to happen, however, HUD needs to listen to the preservationists who have taken the time to examine the value of the city’s public housing stock. It might also consider tapping into a higher level of creative intelligence. Architects like Enrique Norten and Thom Mayne, for instance, are working on major projects for commercial developers in the city’s business district. Enlisting a similar level of imaginative talent to rethink the city’s public housing could help alleviate trenchant social divisions here.

If some feel nostalgia for places like Lafitte, it is partly because it embodies a time when America still seemed capable of a more hopeful vision, one in which architecture, planning and social policy collaborated to create a more decent society.

Posted by M at 04:37:04 | Permalink | No Comments »

A house turned inside out

By Morris Newman, Special to The Times; February 22, 2007

CARMEN ROGERS found her new home almost by accident a couple years ago while flipping through the pages of a magazine at the supermarket checkout line. There it was photographed on a steep hillside in Montecito, the home that architect Barton Myers built for himself and his wife in 1998.

Divided into three separate structures, the steel-and-glass house is uncompromisingly industrial in style yet is still in harmony with the unspoiled, oak-filled hillside.


Carmen and her husband, Rick, knew this was the home they wanted, but they didn’t know if it could be adapted for a corner lot on a busy Westside street.

They contacted Myers, who was intrigued by the challenge. Could the new house retain the qualities the couple most admired in his home, particularly the sense of openness to landscape, in a single-family neighborhood, near Olympic Boulevard?

Myers had been toying with the idea of designing a series of houses, each repeating a few signature elements: steel frame, floor-to-ceiling windows and roll-up doors. These projects — and the Rogerses’ home in particular — would explore steel home construction and test the idea that the hard-edged design of his Montecito house could fit any location.

The newly finished Rogers house resembles the Myers house in some ways but is anything but a replica. The individual pavilions of the Montecito house march straight down the hill like stair steps. The Rogerses’ house, in contrast, sits on a flat double lot on a busy Westside corner and is built around in a “classic Los Angeles courtyard,” Myers says.

THE architect formed the courtyard by arranging three separate, steel-framed structures in a “U” shape around a long, narrow courtyard. Two of the buildings have roll-up doors filled with windows. (The architect calls them “roll-up curtain walls.”) The more conventional walls have rows of clerestory windows along the roof line to maximize natural light.

At the center is the main house, with a large living-dining room with 16-foot ceilings facing south, while a guest house faces west. On the opposite end is Rick’s home office and pool parlor.

The most dramatic moment occurs when doors on the main house roll up out of sight, literally opening to the courtyard. In this configuration, the house looks almost as if no walls ever existed between indoors and outdoors, much as those walls seem to disappear at Myers’ Montecito house.

For the Rogerses, their new house is the culmination of the couple’s personal passion for architecture and design. After serving as a young actor in television and several beach-party movies of the 1960s, Rick transitioned into fashion design, creating beaded denim garments. He also logged five years at UCLA’s interior design program. Carmen Rogers is an interior designer who recently spent three years refurbishing a hotel in Park City, Utah, where the couple have a second home.

The main building, with living room, dining room, kitchen and two bedrooms, has been sparely furnished with carefully chosen Modernist furniture, much of it chosen by Carmen. Few possessions are on view beyond some small paintings, books and a remarkable wood-burning stove in the shape of a gorilla that the Rogerses bought in France many years ago.

His respect for Myers’ architecture was great enough, Rick said, that he was willing to part with rare furniture and other belongings he thought incompatible with the spare, steel-framed house. “We got rid of a lot of things we didn’t want to get rid of,” he says, “but the idea of insulting the integrity of that architecture is not worth it to me.”

Rick found he had to make other compromises as well. He was ambivalent at first about having a roll-up door on his pool room, which he prefers dark, to avoid glare. To accommodate him, the architect provided a dark, roll-down screen to shade the room from the window-filled doors. Rick, an expert pool player, has filled a basement room next to a wine cellar with his cherished collection of inlaid pool cues. (He calls the room “the cue-midor.”)

A lap pool of black-tinted concrete runs along the foot of a wall that separates the courtyard from the street and serves as a reflecting pool when not in use. Like a fountain, the water spills continuously from the pool into an outer trough, and the sound of water helps to shield the courtyard from the sound of intense traffic during rush hour.

One section of the wall is made of poured-in-place concrete, a material strong enough to support a massive, folded-steel, white-painted sculpture by artist Betty Gold. Attached to the wall by thick, horizontal bolts is the steel artwork, which “weighs as much as a Mini-Cooper,” according to architect Thomas Schneider, who served as Myers’ project architect and chief assistant on the Rogerses’ home.

The notion of a walled house in a dense urban setting appealed to Rick, who said it reminded him of cities in South America, “where you walk down the street and it’s all walls, and suddenly you walk into a beautiful courtyard house.”

MYERS, who built two steel houses in Toronto before the one in Montecito, is one of a small but quickly growing number of architects who are popularizing steel construction in houses for a variety of reasons (see box).

The strength of steel, he explains, allows architects to “compress” a home’s structural frame into a minimal metal skeleton. Unlike a conventional wood frame, the steel structure seems almost to disappear, allowing room for floor-to-ceiling windows, as well as broad, column-free spans.

“Steel allows a kind of transparency that is possible only with a highly confined structure,” says Mark Mack, an architect who teaches a steel-house design class with Barton Myers at UCLA School of Art and Architecture.

The idea of the steel house is not a new one. The first one, according to historians, is the famous Maison de Verre or glass house in Paris, designed by Pierre Chareau in 1932, in which the large spaces on the exterior walls left open by the steel frame are filled with glass block. (Myers often speaks admiringly of the glass house; Rick says he made a special effort to see it during a trip to Paris, decades before hiring Myers to design his own steel house.)

In the 1940s and ’50s, the experimental Case Study houses reinvigorated the use of steel in housing. Perhaps the most famous, and one of Myers’ acknowledged inspirations, is the Charles and Ray Eames House, a pair of cubic volumes built in 1949 on an ocean bluff south of Malibu. (The first so-called high-tech house, the Eames House was built entirely of existing industrial materials available from catalogs.)

Another of Myers’ favorite courtyard designs is an unbuilt house by Ralph Rapson, assembled in a mock-up version for the Case Study houses exhibit, “Design for Living,” at the Los Angeles Museum of Contemporary Art in 1991. Like the Eames House, the Rapson house introduces a courtyard between two small, square-edged structures. For the Rogerses’ house, Myers first proposed to emulate the Rapson design with only two structures with a courtyard in between.

Currently, steel construction is enjoying another revival, this time due to the popularity of prefab housing designs by young architects and designers such as Jennifer Siegel. (While expressing admiration for prefab projects, Myers says he designs his houses for specific sites unlike many prefab architects, which offer ready-made solutions for any sites. “You have to solve the architectural problem in each location,” he says.)

For Myers, the Montecito house was a return to steel houses, a building type that the architect has been designing for more than 35 years — he built two steel houses in Canada in the 1970s — and in which he is an acknowledged pioneer. The high level of interest following the publication of the Montecito house seemed to offer Myers the chance to plunge into a new series of steel houses.

“I got about 50 requests from people who wanted me to design houses for them in that style,” says Myers, “although about half of those dropped out when I told them I required a retainer up front.” The Rogerses were among the clients who decided to hang on to their dreams of a steel house. “I had a picture in my mind’s eye of the house I wanted, and that was it,” Rick says.

Carmen, who had been nervous about building on a busy corner, said she is pleased with the results: “It’s amazing how warm the house is.”

The landscape design by Katherine Glascock is one of the things that Carmen likes most about the house. In the center of the courtyard stands a mature stone pine with twisting, expressive branches and long needles. Unable to dig in the side garden because of buried utility lines, Glascock built a hill out of terraces and filled the terraces with papyrus sprays and other exotic plants.

“There is so much glass in the house that we wanted something really good to look at out those windows,” Rick said. “The garden became the artwork for the rooms,” he added. Said Carmen: “When you look out the bedroom window, it’s like being in a garden.”

The architect, for his part, seemed pleased when a visitor calls the courtyard the best room in the house. Although Myers would not disclose the budget of the Rogerses’ residence — the 4,000-square-foot house has several high-end features that skew the cost of construction above the standard range — the architect says that steel houses start at about $500 per square foot, which he says is comparable to the popular high-end housing types, including those he describes derisively as “terrible, Taco Bell Tuscan.” (The skyrocketing costs of construction materials may soon make that figure obsolete, however.)

“There’s two kinds of architecture right now,” says Myers, a man of strong opinions. “One is about making objects, the other is about making spaces,” he says, adding, “I’m interested in making spaces.”


home@latimes.com

*

(INFOBOX BELOW)

Steel is strong and sustainable

Why use steel instead of wood to build a house? The versatility of the material makes it attractive to architects and consumers for both aesthetic and structural reasons. And there’s less waste when using steel rather than wood.

Strength: The most obvious appeal of the material is its strength, which allows the same level of structural stability, or more, as a conventional wooden frame, using far less material. Steel can help minimize structural elements or achieve daring effects, such as Pierre Koenig’s famous Case Study House No. 22 of 1960, a vertigo-inducing structure suspended above Laurel Canyon by cantilevered steel beams.

Cost: Compared with wood framing, steel costs more, although architect Barton Myers says the comparison can be misleading and argues that home builders should look at the overall budget when comparing steel with wood. “Steel is competitive with high-end wood construction, when viewing the budget as a whole,” he says.

Speed of assembly: A skilled crew can frame a steel house in a comparatively short time, sometimes a few days. Although the Rogers’ house took about a year to build — not much of a time savings over a conventional home — Myers said he is working on a second house, this one in Santa Barbara, using prefabricated wall panels and windows, and expects to cut construction time to six months. A shorter construction time can translate into savings in labor costs.

Sustainability: Wood framing involves a large amount of waste: construction of a typical 2,000-square-foot house generates 3,000 pounds of unused wood, or about a quarter of the project’s total waste stream, according to the National Assn. of Homebuilders Research Center. In contrast, the individual parts of a steel frame can be prefabricated in a factory and assembled on-site with virtually no waste. Steel is also more sustainable than wood because the material can be recycled easily. Most of the steel on the market is, in fact, 60% recycled material. “The Rogers house is made out of recycled Buicks and Fords,” Myers says.

— Morris Newman

Posted by M at 03:31:14 | Permalink | No Comments »