Monday, July 3, 2006

Close Magic Mountain? Residents Aren’t Thrilled

By Amanda Covarrubias and Lynn Doan, Times Staff Writers

July 2, 2006

When Magic Mountain opened 35 years ago, the theme park was billed as a magnet for development in the cattle ranches and pastoral hills of northern Los Angeles County — much as a certain magic kingdom had put an obscure southern outpost on the map 15 years earlier.

“Remember what Disneyland did for property values in Anaheim?” read one real estate ad in 1970. “You should be living here when the Mountain comes. Your property values should be all uphill from here.”


Move there they did, by the thousands, making the Santa Clarita Valley and surrounding region the fastest-growing section of Los Angeles County.

As more suburbanites flooded the north county, their relationship with the amusement park was mixed: It generated jobs and taxes, but residents disliked the traffic and crime that periodically caused problems.

But now, as Magic Mountain’s owners talk about shutting it down and selling the 250 acres for development, residents are rallying to keep it around.

Their desire to save the park is driven both by nostalgia for the past and concerns about future development.


“I’ve never known a Santa Clarita without Magic Mountain,” said Santa Clarita Councilman Cameron Smyth, who grew up in the area and worked as a ride operator as a teen. “It’s part of the community … and it’s a landmark for the Santa Clarita Valley.”

North L.A. County is in the midst of a major building boom — adding an estimated 350,000 residents in the next 15 years — and some residents say the region cannot handle another mega-development.

North of Magic Mountain, nearly 21,000 homes are rising on the old Newhall Ranch. Farther up Interstate 5, 23,000 homes are slated for the new community of Centennial near Tejon Ranch. And 15,000 to 20,000 homes are planned on the eastern edges of Santa Clarita.

“The growth here has been just ridiculous,” said Valencia resident Jennifer Molidor, 34, who worked at the park as a photographer when she was a teenager and now takes her children there. “I think we have enough housing here.”

Molidor and others in Santa Clarita say it is ironic that Magic Mountain has become a victim of the development boom that it helped create.

The Santa Clarita Valley’s population was about 48,000 — plus at least 6,000 head of cattle — in 1971 when Magic Mountain opened. Now, it is 170,000 and growing. What started as a middle-class bedroom community has become an upscale suburb with high-end shopping as well as technology and entertainment businesses.

But as homes spread around Magic Mountain, residents grew unhappy about the crowd the park attracts.

While Disneyland has long catered to families, Magic Mountain has always been a magnet for teenagers lured by the venue’s 17 roller coasters. Teen troublemakers have been a periodic problem.

Several high-profile crimes dismayed residents, including a gang-related stabbing spree in 1985, a riot that spilled from the park to businesses in 1993 and the shooting death of a teen in the parking lot in 1998.

In announcing his intention to sell Magic Mountain, Six Flags Chief Executive Mark Shapiro cited the park’s rowdy teen atmosphere and how it has made it difficult to attract families.

“Once you burn Mom, she is not rushing back,” Shapiro said.

Although Shapiro said it was possible that Magic Mountain would be sold to another theme park operator, some real estate experts have said the land is so valuable that converting it for housing or housing-retail development probably would yield the greatest profit.

Real estate experts estimate that the land could be worth at least $200 million.

But many in the Santa Clarita Valley say the region does not need more housing tracts. With traffic worsening and massive developments rising at a rapid clip, north county leaders are struggling to attract more jobs.

The area has some of the worse freeway gridlock in Southern California, and a Metropolitan Transportation Authority report said it will get far worse unless officials can find money to build more roads and rail lines.

On Interstate 5, motorists now crawl during rush-hour at an average of 26 mph. By 2020, according to the MTA, traffic speeds will be down to 11 mph. About 600,000 residents now live in the north county. But the Southern California Assn. of Governments expects the population to reach nearly 1 million by 2020.

Though the theme park generates traffic — and about 2.5 million visitors a year — community leaders say it is also a hub of economic activity that is more beneficial to the region than a housing development would be. The park is the region’s largest employer, with about 4,000 workers.

“I have concerns just because it’s such an economic driver for the valley,” Councilman Smyth said. “If they choose to sell, the tax revenue that it generates would be a noticeable hit.”

Larry Mankin, president and chief executive of the Santa Clarita Valley Chamber of Commerce, said keeping Magic Mountain makes the most sense for the region in part because “it is part of our brand.”

Still, Smyth and others say that if the park is sold for development, the land should be used for job-producing industrial, commercial and office development rather than homes.

But it remains unclear if there is a market for nonresidential use of the land. Moreover, the park is situated in an almost entirely residential area, potentially making it difficult for a dense commercial development to rise from it.

If Magic Mountain closes, it would not be the first Southern California amusement park to succumb to the pressure of development.

Busch Gardens, a tropical-themed park and bird sanctuary in Van Nuys, shut down in 1979 so that the adjacent Anheuser-Busch brewery could expand. Marineland of the Pacific, the water-themed amusement park on the Palos Verdes Peninsula, shut down in 1986. And Lion Country Safari in Irvine, a drive-through zoo concept where the animals roamed free, closed in 1984.

The trend isn’t a surprise, said Los Angeles economist and author Joel Kotkin, noting that most amusement parks rose in the outskirts of town to take advantage of low land costs. But as development pushes out and property values rise, the economics of land-eating theme parks has become harder to justify, he said.

“Maybe the area where they built it was a great place to put a theme park at one time,” Kotkin said. “But the fringe of suburbia is not so fringy anymore.”

Since Six Flags announced its sales plan last month, many Santa Claritans have reminisced about summer jobs and high school outings at the park.

Resident Donna Moore said she could not imagine the area without Magic Mountain. For five years, Moore said, her 16-year-old son, Zachary, has bought a season pass to the park. Unless a good movie is in theaters, she said, the park is his Friday night ritual. She’s gotten so used to carrying around Zachary’s season pass that she pulled it out at an airport once as his identification.

“It’s the only thing that keeps this city from being any other obscure place,” she said.

Moore acknowledged that the park can be rowdy, but she said it has gotten a bad rap.

Not everyone is mourning the possible demise of Magic Mountain. Resident Darrell Mouw is a retired firefighter who in the past had responded to fights in the park.

“Disneyland doesn’t have these kinds of problems,” he said. “I wouldn’t miss a thing.”

*

(INFOBOX BELOW)

More growth projected

Six Flags Inc. is considering a plan to sell Magic Mountain in Valencia. Company officials say the park may be developed into homes. Some other housing developments already planned for the area:

1. Centennial: 23,000 homes

2. Newhall Ranch: 20,885 homes

3. Las Lomas: 5,800 homes

4. Ritter Ranch: 7,200 homes

5. Anaverde: 5,200 homes

**

Population by the numbers

Cities and the unincorporated area in the vicinity of Magic Mountain are expected to add more than 350,000 residents between 2005 and 2020.

Lancaster

2005 population: 142,000

2020 projected population: 215,000

Palmdale

2005 population: 146,000

2020 projected population: 260,000

Santa Clarita

2005 population: 170,000

2020 projected population: 211,000

Unincorporated areas

2005 population: 157,000

2020 projected population: 281,000

**

Amusement park closures

Some other local amusement parks that have gone out of business in the last three decades:

Name Location Closed
Marineland of the Pacific Palos Verdes Peninsula 1986
Lion Country Safari Irvine 1984
Busch Gardens Van Nuys 1979
Long Beach Pike Long Beach 1970s*

* Gradually shut down over a period of years beginning in the 1970s.

Sources: Southern California Assn. of Governments, Times reports

Posted by M at 07:11:14 | Permalink | No Comments »

If You Think LAX Is Busy Now, Just Wait a Month

One of four runways will be closed during major construction. Stand by for delays.

By Jennifer Oldham, Times Staff Writer
July 2, 2006

An intricate, two-year ballet between heavy machinery and jets plying a busy airfield debuts this month at LAX when workers start moving one of the airport’s four runways.

Around midnight July 29, airport workers will paint large yellow Xs on the southernmost runway, a signal to pilots that it is closed. Then, multitudes of dump trucks, graders and excavators will roll onto the airfield, not far from where hundreds of airliners will continue to take off and land each day.

The first major project at Los Angeles International Airport in two decades aims to improve safety and prepare the airport for a new generation of jumbo jets. Work will begin just as the airport enters its most hectic month of the year, putting pilots, airlines, air traffic controllers — and members of nearby communities — on edge.


“I think delays will be more significant than the original forecasts,” Jon Russell, a safety coordinator for the Air Line Pilots Assn., said of the $333-million project to move the runway 55 feet south — closer to the airport’s boundary with El Segundo — and build new taxiways.

The impending mix of heavy construction equipment and commercial air traffic at a crowded airport about to lose one-fourth of its runways has officials looking for ways to head off long delays, which could trigger problems at other airports as well.

Things could get especially dicey during foggy weather or if too many planes queue up for the remaining runways. The Federal Aviation Administration recently took the unusual step of suggesting that airlines rework their schedules to cut back their peak-time LAX operations.

And LAX is experiencing its busiest summer in years, with long lines at ticket counters and security checkpoints, packed planes and routinely overbooked flights.

Airport officials say they must begin work on the project now to be ready to reopen the runway in time to handle the Airbus A380 next year. The soon-to-be-relocated runway, one of two that lie south of the terminals, is the only one of the airport’s runways wide enough to accommodate the 555-seat behemoth. (The other two runways are north of the terminals. The runways south of the terminals are the longest of the four.)

“It’s a tremendous safety improvement. We want to get it done as quickly as we can,” said Jake Adams, runway project manager for the city’s airport agency.

The agency and federal aviation officials have lobbied the City Council for years to move the runway. But lawsuits by neighboring cities hamstrung the project until December, when Los Angeles agreed to rethink its LAX modernization plans in exchange for the suits being dropped.

The city’s airport agency and the FAA have argued that the work would help prevent close calls on the ground between aircraft at LAX, which historically has had among the nation’s highest rates of so-called runway incursion incidents.

More than 80% of the close calls at LAX occur on the south side after pilots land on the outer runway, turn right onto a series of taxiways and stop too close to the inner runway, where planes take off.

After construction is complete, pilots will land on the outer runway and turn onto a new center taxiway, forcing them to slow down before they enter a series of secondary taxiways to cross the inner runway.

After the runway reopens in March, officials will start building the center taxiway and connecting it to both runways on the airport’s south side with more taxiways.

Until the taxiways are completed in July 2008, things will be even more challenging as workers stitch connectors to the inner runway at night, keeping the runway open during the day.

Moving the southernmost runway is a massive undertaking that required months of planning to reorchestrate 1,800 flights that use the airport each day and to reroute airplanes once they land.

Construction will bring more than 800 truck trips a day, while most of the airport’s south side — including its remaining runway — will stay open to air traffic. At night, when much of the major work will take place, many Boeing 747 cargo jets will have to cross the construction zone to access warehouses on the airport’s south side.

“We’re building something that’s 3 miles long, 4 feet deep and 200 feet wide,” said Ray Jack, airport operations supervisor at LAX. “It’s a huge project.”

In periodic briefings with truck drivers and other construction workers about the dangers of driving on an airfield, Jack uses dramatic pictures from a Sept. 27, 1999, accident at LAX involving a Corsair Boeing 747, a pickup and several large dump trucks.

The far right engine on the two-story aircraft smashed into two big-rig dirt haulers — peeling back the cab roof on each like the skin of an orange — and hit a white pickup, flipping it over, after the pilot turned onto a closed taxiway late at night.

No one was hurt. The aircraft, with 321 on board, was taxiing for takeoff.

To prevent such accidents, officials will update pilots on the runway project through periodic bulletins and will block off the site with bright orange fences. Flagmen will be stationed on taxiways to ensure that trucks yield to aircraft. To keep debris from getting sucked into jet engines, mobile sweepers will constantly clean taxiways.

Work will take place 20 hours a day, with contractors simultaneously tearing up the old 11,095-foot runway and building the new one. To break up the existing runway, workers will use a piece of equipment known as a “hoe ram” that stomps on the concrete like a jackhammer on steroids.

Trucks filled with the crushed concrete will make 200 round trips a day, down a road built between the two runways, to a concrete plant on LAX’s western edge. There, old concrete will be recycled. An additional 300 trucks per day will bring remixed concrete for the new runway.

Like a concrete layer cake, the new runway will have three sections: 12 inches of lime-treated material on the bottom, 12 inches of low-strength concrete in the middle and 19 inches of concrete on the top. The concrete will be built in 20-by-20-foot squares that will be knitted together with metal bars.

While construction is taking place, controllers must reroute flights that typically would land on the southernmost runway. The FAA used computer models to help figure out how to get the most from the three remaining runways.

Air traffic controllers employed simulations to reassure the airport’s 85 carriers that their passengers wouldn’t experience major delays as a result of construction.

But some airline representatives are skeptical.

“It’s still somewhat of an open question mark from our perspective,” said Frank Clark, executive director of the nonprofit organization that represents airlines operating from the Tom Bradley International Terminal.

International carriers, many of which take off around midnight for Asia, fear they could be stuck with a tough choice if too many planes want to use the airport’s longest runway, the one next to the one being moved, at the same time: burn precious fuel during a long wait for takeoff or switch to a shorter runway, which could require them to remove cargo.

Airlines are also concerned that during foggy periods, typically from November to February, some flights would have to be rerouted to other airports.

To forestall delays during poor weather and busy times, air traffic controllers worked with the airlines and encouraged them to revamp their schedules.

“We actually distributed to all the airlines our breakdown of anticipated problems during certain time frames, and we emphasized to them, ‘You might consider spreading out your schedule during these hours where we have peak traffic,’ ” said Marv Shappi, operations manager at the LAX tower.

But Clark, who represents carriers in the Bradley terminal, said the 34 airlines he works with haven’t revised their schedules because of reassurances from the FAA that construction will cause minimal disruptions. It was unclear whether any of the other 51 airlines have made changes.

If LAX becomes too busy at times, planes awaiting takeoff from other Southern California airports could be kept on the ground to avoid crowded skies. LAX would receive priority as it tries to clear a backup, officials said.

With air traffic down by 20% since the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, and with some carriers using smaller jets, officials are hoping that delays at LAX will not climb significantly, despite losing one-fourth of its runways during the relocation.

“Of course there’s going to be an impact,” Shappi said. “During certain time frames there might be reportable delays, but we don’t think we’re going to get into any sort of gridlock scenario.”

A reportable delay is defined as an arriving flight that is more than 15 minutes late. In the aggregate, on-time arrivals at LAX already have declined somewhat this year.

Surrounding communities also will be affected by the project, which will require aircraft to taxi greater distances and idle longer, temporarily increasing harmful emissions, according to environmental studies conducted for the runway project.

“When they start increasing the number of operations on those other three runways, then the people are going to be upset,” said Roy Hefner, a Westchester resident who is on an airport committee that studies noise.

Airport officials and the main contractor that is reworking the southern runway complex, Tutor-Saliba Corp., have promised to reduce noise, emissions and dust by retrofitting construction equipment and continuously watering down the site. The city’s airport agency also hired an independent company to monitor requirements to ease effects on the community.

With construction in full swing in a matter of days, air traffic controllers caution that mechanical problems or bad weather could throw off their best-laid plans.

“If there’s an aircraft mishap, like someone’s gear collapses on the runway, and now we’re down to two runways,” the FAA’s Shappi said, “all bets are off.”

Posted by M at 07:09:58 | Permalink | No Comments »